26 May 2017

Gun control: What happens to your firearm in SA when you hand it in to the police?

By Mike Smith
27th of May 2017

Over the years we have seen several amnesty periods for “illegal guns” in South Africa. The latest one is the one that started in April and will run for six months until September.

Since the new laws came in on the 30th of June 2009, the ANC regime wanted to declare all firearms illegal, criminalize 1,3 million legal South African gun owners and wanted people to go and reapply and reregister legitimate firearms and produce competency certificates, etc. Basically just a totalitarian scam by a totalitarian Marxist regime to find out who owns what type of gun and how many. Many people did not bother and just handed the damn firearm in.

Here is a good rule of thumb: Never trust a government that does not trust its citizens with guns.

Nevertheless, these “illegal” firearms are not just those owned by criminals, but also those inherited by normal law-abiding citizens or people whose licenses expired. BTW your license cannot expire if it does not have an expiry date on it. SA Hunters takes SAPS to Court about Firearm Licence Renewals
Renew in time or lose your gun

Unfortunately, what normally happens in these cases is that law-abiding citizens are the only ones who hand their firearms in. The criminals and gangsters don’t. It is not rocket science.

Read the comments on this article for instance: 'Turn in your guns' - Firearms amnesty announced by Police Minister

However the question is, “What happens to your firearm after you have handed it in?”

Here is a report that tells you exactly what happens to your gun. The police sell it to gangsters and criminals who then go about killing children and innocent people.

Exclusive: Confidential info leak in stolen cop guns case involving 3028 dockets

Police Colonel Chris Prinsloo of Vereniging was in charge of the police armoury and stole 2400 over a period of ten years.

These weapons had to be kept locked in sealed steel boxes at the confiscated firearms store in Silverton, Gauteng, before being destroyed. Police were meant to destroy all these discarded, redundant, and obsolete firearms.

Colonel Chris Prinsloo sold these firearms to Rondebosch businessman Irshaad "Hunter" Laher via a middleman, Vereeniging arms dealer Alan Raves. In June 2016, Prinsloo was sentenced to 18 years behind bars after entering a plea and sentence agreement with the State. He pleaded guilty to 11 charges, including theft, racketeering, and money laundering.

Laher offered Prinsloo R2m in exchange for stolen firearms and ammunition that were meant to be destroyed. Raves allegedly offered Prinsloo and another police officer R100 000 for firearms and ammunition. Prinsloo was charged with stealing parts of firearms - between 300 and 400 rifles, and up to 20 000 rifle cartridges.

Netwerk24 previously reported that 89 children had been shot dead on the Cape Flats between February 2010 and December 2015 with firearms stolen by Prinsloo. In that same period, another 170 children survived after being shot with the same firearms. The incidents were linked via ballistics to more than 800 firearms that Western Cape detectives had traced so far.

Major General Peter Jacobs who headed the province's crime intelligence unit, was demoted and appointed Wynberg cluster commander when he discovered 250 firearms in a house in gang ridden Valhalla Park in October 2016. He and Major-General Jeremy Vearey , despite their expertise and probes into illegal firearms, were told to leave the scene. They said the instruction apparently came from the head of the Western Cape’s Crime Intelligence division, Mzwandile Tiyo. Since then both were shifted sideways and they have been subjected to constant smear campaigns.

General Jacobs, in an affidavit in the matter, has referred to the firearms case, saying 888 of the 2 000 firearms Prinsloo supplied, were forensically connected to 1 066 murders. This was for the period between 2010 and May 31, 2016.

25 May 2017

Extending the Spur Boycott

By Mike Smith
26th of May 2017

I have read the CEO of Spur, Piere van Tonder’s new open letter and response to Dr. Dirk Hermann in both Afrikaans and English versions as well as the comments on Maroela Media.

You can see it here:

Spur CEO's Open Letter To Solidarity: This Boycott Serves A Political Agenda

Spur hoof se ope brief aan Solidariteit

All I can say is that I am flabbergasted at Van Tonder’s idiocy. What did he think? Did he honestly believe that his attack on Dr. Dirk Hermann (because that is what it is) will make people stream back to Spur? Did he think his extended bullying tactics and slaps he dealt out to whites would make them crawl back? He must be a special kind of stupid. We had enough! We are not your punching bag, Mr Van Tonder!

Van Tonder admits that Spur (that means, HE) made mistakes, but refuses to mention those mistakes by name.

Look, do not get me wrong, I also have a problem with Dr Dirk Hermann. People tend to forget that Hermann did his thesis on Affirmative Action and that he wrote a booklet on how to implement Affirmative Action fairly. In other words he approves of Affirmative Action, just not always in how it is implemented. It is like saying rape and murder is OK as long as you do it gently.

I am not sure if Dr. Hermann still stands by his original views, I mean people change, but in my opinion Affirmative Action is wrong, period.

BEE and Affirmative Action says that all blacks were "disadvantaged" and all whites were "advantaged".

Affirmative Action is racist. It is a system based on race and not on historical fact. Under the current interpretation even rich blacks were “disadvantaged” and poor whites were “advantaged”.

Affirmative Action can NEVER be implemented fairly. It should be banned and declared illegal. Our constitution (chapter 2) Bill of Rights (section 9) unfortunately makes it clear that discrimination on the base of race is “fair discrimination” when it is done against whites and unfair when done against blacks.

Nevertheless, what is the solution for Spur?

First of all they need to play open cards. They should stop to underestimate people’s intelligence.

Spur played judge, jury and executioner in this incident and now it is haunting them. They need to (as soon as possible) release the unedited, full version of the video to the public so that people can make their own judgments. Spur needs to call both parties in the incident into their head office at Century City in Cape Town and resolve the issue fairly. They should admit to their mistakes in how they handled the incident.

Spur should publicly and openly state their commitment to non-racial practices of ANY kind. They should abandon any and all forms of bias and discrimination based on race. That includes distancing themselves from BEE and Affirmative Action. They should allow managers, cooks, waiters and waitresses to be employed on merit and not on race. That means also employing white, coloured and Indian waitresses (not just blacks) who can actually speak English and Afrikaans to a reasonable degree and respect their patron’s constitutional rights to be addressed in their mother tongue, as far as reasonably possible.

Lastly, they need to improve the quality of their food and service. Maybe then, people will start coming back.

Until then…The boycott continues and it will be extended to all other franchises and products. That means that from now on we will also boycott Pannarotties, John Dory’s and Captain DoRegos.

Good Luck, Van Tonder.




Spur on its knees. Putting up a brave face

By Mike Smith
25th of May 2017

Who said whites cannot stand together?

The Daily Maverick is reporting the Spur franchise is making record losses and has to offer rescue packages to the hardest hit franchisees who might have to lay off staff or close.

A Taste for Strife: How a right-wing boycott has lost Spur millions and counting

Of course I am referring to the incident in March 2017 at the Texamo Spur at the Glen Shopping Centre, east of Johannesburg, where a white child complained to her father that she was bullied by a black child which led to a heated argument between the man and the foster mother of the black child, Lebohang Mabuya.

I reported on it here and called for the Spur to be boycotted. Spur needs a taste of reality

Front Nasionaal called for a boycott on the 21st of March 2017

The reasons for my call to a boycott was that Spur supports racist policies such as BEE and Affirmative Action and got rid of their white waiters/waitresses. With this incident nobody intervened despite having four managers on the premises at the time. Their only concern was to prevent othor patrons from leaving.

Further…Afterwards Spur unilaterally decided who the aggressor was without having all the facts and evidence and outright banned the white man. They also issued a statement in which they vilified the white man, apologized one-sidedly to the black woman and offered her a free meal. Spur CEO Pierre van Tonder also said they planned to offer Mabuya and her family trauma counselling and any other support where possible. No councelling offered to the white child that was bullied.

They further distributed a picture across all Spur branches through its internal communication portal and banned him. Said Pierre van Tonder, CEO of Spur on Radio 702: …” This gentleman's picture will be up in Spurs and he will be asked to leave, should he arrive at any of our establishments."

Radio 702: Spur CEO: Man's pic will be up at restaurants and he is not welcome

They twisted the story and still refuse to release the full video to the public claiming that their version of the story is the correct one and people should simply trust them.

Eyewitnesses said that the woman swore at the man before the subsequent exchanges were captured on film and that the black child did indeed hit the white child in the face.

Of course the one-sided hypocritical media of South Africa played along and kept pushing the one-sided version of Spur and Lebohang Mabuya.

Funny enough, all Front Nasionaal is calling for is an apology and equal treatment of both parties. Spur, however refuses to admit that they were biased in their handling of the issue and stick to their original story.

To add insult to injury they created a straw man and lightning deflector of intolerance to violence against women and children. On top of it, Mark Farrelly, Chief Operating Officer of Spur, basically made the Spur boycotters off as rightwing, racist scum when he said the boycott is largely restricted to areas that “would previously have voted for the Conservative Party”.

Not sure what was wrong with the Conservative Party, seeing that it was a fully legitimate party and the official opposition against the NP for a while. Seems like when you have any other view than the Libtard view you are leprous yet they talk about rightwingers being “intollerant”.

Nevertheless, Farrelly further insulted the intelligence of Spur Boycotters and “believes that much of the anger from certain sectors of the white Afrikaner population is based on the circulation of fake news and misconceptions about the incident.”

Well, I can assure him that most of my readers who are Spur Boycotters are actually English speaking. They are hugely mistaken if they think only Afrikaners are rightwing.

Nevertheless on the 23rd of May The Herald newspaper from Port Elizabeth/Uitenhage reported that Spur is losing millions. Beef with Spur cuts diner’s appetite

However the idiots at Spur refuse to acknowledge the righteous anger of the white community who now feels vilified and alienated over their handling of the incident and they are downplaying the boycott.

Spur Boycott affecting a minority of our branches - COO in areas with "certain demographical characteristics".

Spur's Afrikaner hating, Conservative hating, COO,
Libtard Mark Farrelly
In other words in scummy, poor White Afrikaner areas, right? Funny enough…I always thought PE/Uitenhage area was more English.

Nevertheless...On Tuesday, CEO of trade union Solidarity Dirk Hermann wrote an excellent open letter to Farrelly that was published on Maroela Media: Dear Mark: 'I’ve lost my appetite for Spur'

Hermann said white people were tired of political correctness at their expense and of being bullied every time they voiced an opinion. He also mentions that Spur alienated their former loyal white clients who supported them for decades, because there is a new market now. A new black middle class who they are catering for and therefore they are not worried about the white clients they are losing. The message is that whites don’t count to them anymore.

So it seems as if Spur is doing a fantastic job of alienating more and more whites with their attitude. I just feel sorry for the other poor franchisees and their workers who had nothing to do with the original incident, but are now suffering because of the attitudes of their bosses at head office. Nevertheless, the Spur CEO and head office have nailed their colours to the mast and these franchisees stick to that brand. They shouldn’t then complain that whites are shunning their brand.

Ban all Spur products!
Therefore I want to renew the call for the Spur boycott, but I want to extend it to ALL Spur products such as their sauces, spices and other condiments that you can buy in the supermarkets. Let it rot on the shelves. Throw it out of your fridge. Break the bottles. Send us the pics and we will post it.

…And I hope Wimpy is paying attention, because they are next.

Also read my follow up: What is in your Spur Burger?

Also read: Black drive-thru worker ‘smeared period blood on burger of customer with a bad attitude’ …I mean, you never know…Probably been happening at Spur for decades.

23 May 2017

“Tainted Heroes“ - The full documentary

By Mike Smith
23rd of May 2017

Take a bowl of popcorn and watch this shocking film. Watch how the Marxist ANC mass murdered thousands of blacks in South Africa. Their war was not so much against Apartheid. It was against black organizations and black individuals they viewed as rivals. Much of the real history of the ANC and its bloody “struggle” has remained carefully hidden from the public to this day.

New American: New Film Exposes Takeover of South Africa by Communist Terrorists

“The film shatters many of the ANC myths and lies. Some of the most shocking testimony in the film comes from black victims of the ANC, as well as from ANC operatives who participated in the atrocities against both white and black civilians. Others shown in the film describe the brutal and deliberate murder of their families — including young children — by the ANC's terrorist wing. Indeed, one former ANC operative interviewed and shown in the film describes how the ANC made a conscious decision to target even the wives and children of South African farmers for extermination. “

Warning: Not for the sensitive.

How Zuma plans to radically rob the Government Employees Pension Fund

By Mike Smith
23rd of May 2017

Three months ago Senior Business Consultant, Pietman Roos, wrote an article analyzing Jacob Zuma’s State of the Nation Adress in which he made his “Nine Point Plan” known.


In it he points out what Zuma is planning with his “Radical Economic Transformation”...It is nothing but a scheme to rob the Government Employees Pension Fund.

Zuma was so scared that people would see through his plan that he deployed 400 soldiers outside of parliament. Alas...the sheep didn’t notice a thing. So the plan is going ahead. Every South African who is currently working for the government, in a government parastatal or has ever worked for the government will soon find out that their pensions are totally worthless. Robbed and carried away by the thieving Marxist scum in the ANC, just like Mugabe did in Zimboonia.

See, it will work like this:

The Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) invests its money in parastatals and companies doing business with Government.

The GEPF assets total R825 billion and some spare change as at 30 December 2016 – making it the single biggest fund in South Africa.

The Public Investment Corporation (PIC) aka (Dept of Finance, Malusi Gigaba & Associates) is the biggest manager at 86% of the fund, but the GEPF uses almost 20 fund managers in total. PIC is wholly owned by the South African government.

Zuma promised in his SONA to crack down on all these companies to have more BEE and to de-concentrate their ownership. This will result in a loss of shareholder value, and by extension, severe losses to GEPF beneficiaries.

Zuma is going to do it all legally of course:

President Zuma cited the following policy developments in the SONA:

• New regulations making it compulsory for big contractors to subcontract 30 percent of business to black owned enterprises have been finalised and were gazetted on the 20 January 2017

• A provision to criminalize cartels and collusion which came into effect on 1 May 2016

• The Department of Economic Development (DED) will bring legislation to Cabinet that will seek to amend the Competition Act. It will amongst others, address the need to have a more inclusive economy and to de-concentrate the high levels of ownership and control we see in many sectors

• Continuation of the Black Industrialists programme

• Pursue direct state involvement in mining. The Mining Company of South Africa Bill will be presented to Cabinet and Parliament during 2017

The Government Employees Pension Fund is also used to bail out failed government parastatals such as Eskom and SAA. It is a guaranteed fund, which means if the money is gone, taxpayers will be held responsible for the losses.

In other words, Zuma, Gigaba and the Guptas will run these businesses into the ground, bankrupt them, steal the government employees’ pensions to bail them out.... and you and I will have to pay for it. I won't be surprised if they used the GEPF to fund their nuclear deal with Russia.

Challenging some popular theories on human migration

Out of Africa - The bullshit story we are all familiar with

By Mike Smith
23rd of May 2017

Debunking the “Out of Africa” Theory

Conventional theory is that Whites and Asians all originated from blacks of Africa and somehow managed to get their distinctive skin colours and eye features after they exited Africa.

How people can still believe this rubbish and teach it in the schools are beyond me.

An examination of over 5,000 teeth from early human ancestors shows that many of the first Europeans probably came from Asia, not from Africa.

Scientific American: Is the “Out of Africa theory” out?

Ötzi stumps out of Africa theory Bacteria found in the stomach of the famous 5,300 year old Ice Man shows that Whites could not have come from Africa.

Australian, Swedish, Russian, German and Danish studies all show that DNA evidence debunks the “Out of Africa” theory and that Homo Sapiens Sapiens ancestor probably comes from Australia.

See...Nobody can explain how Australian Aborigines, who had the most primitive of primitive tools 70,000 years ago could build boats in Africa that could cross hundreds of miles of ocean and how these people could navigate to Australia together with their dogs and on top of it leave all their African genes behind, because believe it or not, there is no African in Abo.

As early as a few decades ago the Australians didn’t even class Abo’s as humans. What changed? Libtard brainwashing and propaganda, is what happened.

As such, a very recent paper on Y-chromosomes released in 2012, (Re-Examing the “Out of Africa” Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasians) in the Light of DNA Genealogy written by Anatole A. Klyosov and Igor L. Rozhanski) only confirms the denial of any African ancestry in Australia, and strongly supports the existence of a “common ancestor” who “would not necessarily be in Africa. In fact, it was never proven that he lived in Africa.

Start of Quote:

“The researchers are adamant that their extensive study “offers evidence to re-examine the validity of the Out-of-Africa concept”. They see no genetic proof substantiating an African precedence in the Homo sapien tree, and maintain that “a more plausible interpretation might have been that both current Africans and non-Africans descended separately from a more ancient common ancestor, thus forming a proverbial fork”.

End of quote:

You see? DNA evidence proves that Homo Kafricanus are a completely different species altogether.

Bantu Migration
But giving them the prefix of “Homo” is actually wrong.

Are they even human? Mrs Ples, and the Taung Child are Australipothecus africanus, a sub-species of Gorilla, not human.

Blacks are descendants from Australipothecus (aka Paranthropus) Robustus. Paranthropus in Greek means “Para” – Beside…..”Anthropos” – Human.

Paranthropus is associated with stone tools both in southern and eastern Africa. Hand fossils from Swartkrans, South Africa, indicate that the hand of Paranthropus robustus was adapted for precision grasping and tool use. Evidence from Swartkrans also shows that they used fire.

So what is next…are troops of chimps now going to come and lay claim to South Africa? Maybe if we make a baboon and his troop president he will do a better job than Zuma and the ANC. Definitely can't be worse.

Coin from Carthage
Then you get the Afrocentric idiots who want to say that General Hannibal Barca of Carthage was black or that the Egyptians were black. Of course utter rubbish. It is like saying General De La Rey was black because he came from Africa.

Another Carthage coin
Carthage was a Phoenician colony and the Phoenicians were WHITE. Just do a Google Image search on Phoenician and Carthage coins and see for yourself how these people looked like. Look at their sharp thin noses sticking out in front of their lips. With blacks the lips protrude out in front of the nose.

So where do whites come from?

Often Black South Africans tell white South Africans to go back to Europe but themselves do not want to go back to central Africa. Nevertheless there is a flaw in their reasoning.

Whites, Caucasians, Indo European, Indo-Germanic, whatever you want to call them are all Aryans from northern Iran area. There were two groups:

The settled ones were the Parthian Empire and the more nomadic ones were the Scythians

Who were these people?

We know a great deal about their physical appearance; they were long-headed giants (over two metres tall) with blond hair and blue eyes and recently, a large number of their mummified corpses were discovered in western China; these mummies, which are extremely well-preserved in the arid conditions of the Taklamakan desert, are now on display at the museums of Khotan, Urumchi, and Turfan in Sinkiang; they are dressed in
Scythian costume, i.e., leather tunic and trousers, and are usually displayed in the sitting position, exactly as described by Herodotus; what is extra ordinary apart from their northern European features, however, is their gigantic heights, well over two metres as they are now, in spite of the natural shrinkage expected during the past thousands of years.

Head of a blonde Scythian
Scythians were not just blood-thirsty barbarians (they used to drink the blood of their first victim on the battlefield and practiced scalping and decapitation of victims).

This can be seen in their elaborate golden artwork. Scythian gold came from the Altai district and from frequent raids on Greek and Persian cities. Gold was sewn into their garments in the form of plates, fashioned into belts, broaches, necklaces, torques, scabbards, helmets, earrings, and ornaments, and worked into their weapons. The Scythians had an eye for design, especially depictions of griffins, lions, wolves, stags, leopards, eagles and – the Scythians’ favourite motif – animals in deadly combat.

Scythian artwork

Mummy of a blonde haired Scythian chief with tattoos.
Herodotus testified that the Scythians wore tattoos as a sign of their nobility. A Scythian without tattoos showed that he was of low station. The existence of Scythian tattoos was confirmed in 1948, when a Russian archaeologist uncovered the frozen body of a Scythian chieftain.

Settling the Americas: The Bering Strait Crossing Theory vs Solutrean hypothesis

For decades, anthropologists had suggested that people entered North America from Siberia via the Bering land bridge, then spread south into the U.S. and Mexico via a corridor that opened up between the melting ice sheets in what is now Alberta and B.C. about 13,000 years ago.

At least this is the story I was told in school and what they still teach the kids today.

Debunking the Bering Straits Crossing Theory

Vine Deloria Jr.
The Native American Professor of Political Science Vine Deloria Jr who died in 2005 took apart the entire Bering Strait Hypothesis in his book Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact

Some of the evidence against it is the absence of historical record in American Indian folklore; the absence of significant numbers of artefacts on either side of the Strait; the fact that there was a giant ice barrier that isolated Alaska from the rest of North America during the last Ice Age; that there were mainly mountain ranges in the way, and it is very unrealistic to believe that the animals that supposedly migrated into North America from Asia would have bothered leaving their comfy homes and travelled across mountain ranges to live in a strange land with strange food; that the Bering Strait bridge would only have been possible if there was a drop of at least 200 feet of the world's sea level. Also, he points out an interesting fact - that only 2% of Eskimos live in Siberia, so it's more realistic to assume the Inuit travelled from East to West rather than from West to East.

Of course he was heavily criticised for his views...until evidence surfaced last year in May 2016.

A study was published in Science Advances Journal on May 13, 2016 Pre-Clovis occupation 14,550 years ago at the Page-Ladson site, Florida, and the peopling of the Americas that debunked the Bering Strait hypothesis.

S. David Webb, a paleontologist then at the University of Florida and James Dunbar from Aucilla Research Institute found stone tools and mastodon bones together underwater in the Aucilla River near Tallahassee, and proved conclusively that “people butchered or scavenged a mastodon… at least 1,500 years earlier than previously suspected.” This discovery places ancient Indians in Florida before passage to the Americas from Asia through the Bering Land Bridge was ice-free.

The Solutrean Hypothesis

The Solutrean Hypothesis

The, Solutrean hypothesis first proposed in 1998 by Archaeologists Dennis Stanford of the Smithsonian Institution and Bruce Bradley of the University of Exeter, is a hypothesis about the settlement of the Americas that claims that people from Europe may have been among the earliest settlers of the Americas.

The Solutrean Culture was found in the area of modern day France and Spain about 20,000 years BC.

The reason for their Hypothesis is that the tools (including sewing needles with an eye and fishing hooks) as well as arrow and spear points (Clovis point) found amongst North American people resemble that of Europeans and not Asians. Lithic or stone tool antecedents of Clovis points have not been found in northeast Asia and no Clovis sites have been found in Alaska or Yukon.

The Solutrean Hypothesis contrasts with the mainstream archaeological orthodoxy that the North American continent was first populated by people from Asia, either by the Bering land bridge at least 13,500 years ago, or by maritime travel along the Pacific coast, or by both.

Clovis projectile tips
The Solutrean hypothesis builds on similarities between the Solutrean industry and the later Clovis culture / Clovis points of North America, and suggests that people with Solutrean tool-technology crossed the Ice Age Atlantic by moving along the pack ice edge, using survival skills similar to those of modern Eskimo people. The migrants arrived in northeastern North America and served as the donor culture for what eventually developed into Clovis tool-making technology.

Clovis points were first discovered near the city of Clovis, New Mexico, and have since been found over most of North America and as far south as Venezuela. Major sites are Anzick site ( Montana); the Blackwater Draw site (New Mexico); the Colby site (Wyoming); the Gault site (Texas); the Simon site (Idaho); the East Wenatchee Clovis Site (Washington); Clovis points have also been found northwest of Dallas, Texas. But as we have seen… No Clovis sites have been found in Alaska or Yukon.

New research sinks Bering Strait land bridge theory

Further… DNA evidence taken from pollen, plant and animal sources in the lakes in British Columbia and Alberta were consolidated in a new study by Danish, Canadian and American scientists and shows that migrating across the Bering Straits would have been impossible, as there wasn't enough food and vegetation growing in the ice free corridor to support humans until long after people were living south of the ice sheets.

CBCNews: Popular theory on how humans populated North America can't be right, study shows

Read the full study here: Nature article: Postglacial viability and colonization in North America’s ice-free corridor

Update; 24th of May 2017.

This must be such a massive blow to libtards and blacks

TimesLive: Humans 'not out of Africa after all'

“The history of human evolution might have to be rewritten - new discoveries suggested that Europe, not Africa, was the birthplace of mankind.”

New York Post: Fossil discovery delivers blow to ‘Out of Africa’ theory

The creature, known as Graecopithecus freybergi and nicknamed “El Graeco,” may be the oldest known member of the human lineage that began after a split from the branch that led to chimpanzees, our closest cousins.

Newsweek: First Human Ancestor Came from Europe Not Africa, 7.2 Million-year-old Fossils Indicate

The “out of Africa” theory—promoted by the leftist establishment in its mania to prove racial equality—has been thoroughly disproven with the news that the oldest homid fossils have been found in Europe, not Africa.

Out of Africa theory dies

UK Telegraph: Europe was the birthplace of mankind, not Africa, scientists find

20 May 2017

Our future Macro Boer Republic

By Mike Smith
21st of May 2017

Special thanks to one of our readers who made a graphic interpretation of our vision. From now on this picture will replace the colonial ones on the side bar.

Take note that our Northern borders will be the Kunene, the Okavango and the Zambezi rivers.

19 May 2017

Ignorance is bliss when it comes to European superiority

By Mike Smith
19th of May 2017

Define “superior”.

I believe black Americans are superior to whites when it comes to basketball, 100 m sprinting and boxing. Few people will have a problem acknowledging that.

Why do blacks have a problem acknowledging that whites are intellectually superior to blacks and on average 30 IQ points higher than sub Saharan blacks?

In fact there are lots of things that blacks are superior in over whites; Rap, break dancing, crime, joblessness, laziness, gangsterism, female and infant abandonment, ....Blacks are far superior than whites.

Having said that I do not believe that Whites are superior intellectually in everything, because IQ scores have shown that North East Asians (Chinese, Japanese, Koreans) are on average 5 IQ points higher than whites and that Ashkenazi Jews are on average highest in the world 15 IQ points higher than White Europeans.

Some things about a human being can be improved, such as culture, values and beliefs, but IQ will remain the same. It is inherited.

Problem is...what value system and or culture is the best and most superior in the eyes of whom?

If we can all agree on that, then surely we should all aspire to this superior value system and culture, whatever it is. Why can we not pick one and all become like that?

Let us say the Arab or American culture is the best and highest, then, why are we not all aspiring to it? If the Chinese culture is far superior, then why are we not all trying to be like them?

The reason why I am asking is, because the Europeans seem to think that their culture and value system is the best and that these illegal immigrants they call “refugees” should adopt their leading culture, or as the Germans call it...the “Leitkultur” a term introduced in 1998 by the German-Arab sociologist Prof Bassam Tibi.

Of course Tibi is a Muslim, but he also coined another term, called "Euro-arrogance" and said that Europeans are the inventors of racism and European imperialism and colonisation disrupted and deformed other cultures...conveniently forgetting of course that Muslims colonised everything from India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, large parts of Russia, Syria, North Africa, Spain, Greece and Italy...Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years. However, according to Tibi, that was all OK and good colonisation seeing that it was not driven by “racism”. The only colonisation ever driven by “racism” was European imperialism, therefore it was bad.

In 1995 he was decorated by the President of Germany, Roman Herzog, with the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany, (Bundesverdientskreuz), First Class.

The problem is that Muslims in France, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium, etc are NOT integrating and not interested to EVER integrate. Thilo Sarrazin wrote a book about it.

To the Europeans this is unacceptable, but also a mystery. They cannot believe that these people are shunning their superior white western European culture and values. European culture is so great, why wouldn’t anyone and everyone fight to be a European?

Try as they might, the Europeans are finding out that after three generations of living in Europe, many of the Turks and Arabs can hardly speak German, Dutch or French.

What the Europeans do not understand is that Muslims see them as filthy and weak.

First of all, Europeans eat pork. They love pork. To a Muslim this is the most disgusting thing anyone can do. To them a pig is a filthy, disgusting animal. Calling someone a pig is the biggest insult to a Muslim. If you eat a pig; You are a pig.

Muslims despise alcohol. Europeans love it. Beer and wine is part of their culture. Imagine Germany or Belgium without beer. Imagine France, Spain or Italy without wine. Even Germany has vast wine regions and a wine drinking culture. However, for a Muslim, next to pork, alcohol is the most disgusting thing one can consume.

Then we talk about dress code. When I was about 22, I made the mistake of walking through the streets of Adana in Turkey with a “Manga” shorts, T shirt and flip flops. My two South African friends had the same clothes on. It was hot. Unbeknown to us, we were seen as gay. Men would follow us and feel our legs up from behind and came on to us. The first time the one touched my thigh I thought it was an accident, the second time I wanted to punch the fucker. We only found out much later what it meant in Muslim countries when a man walked in shorts.

You are gay and free game. Muslim men do not walk in shorts.

Now imagine what Muslims think of German men in Lederhosen.

European men love it when their women wear mini’s and high heels and have beautiful long hair. A European man feels proud to walk with such a woman...

...Not a Muslim. Such a woman is an utter slut and deserves to be gang-raped. To Muslims the hair of a woman is part of her private parts. It is like her cookie or titties and only the husband is allowed to see it. To a Muslim it is unthinkable to let a woman dress like European women. European men who allow their women to dress like that, and God forbid leave the house alone or go to work like that, must the most softest of sissies you can imagine.

Lastly, Muslims are quick to point out that they believe Jesus was a prophet, (Nabi Isah = Prophet Jesus). However, Muslims despise Christians. They cannot comprehend the Trinity of God. It is completely unthinkable how stupid Christians are to believe that God can be three Gods in one. Christianity is a disgusting false religion that should be destroyed.

Problem is the European libtards will never get it. They honestly believe they are good people. They keep on helping Muslims, supporting Muslims. They believe in “tollerance”. They keep filling their cities up with people who despise them, their religious beliefs and their culture, yet believe if we are all tolerant to each other we can all live happily side by side. They simply cannot understand how somebody can hate Europeans. Therefore they don’t believe it is true. They believe, just be nice and kind to Muslims and when they see what a good person you are they are going to love you and want to be like you. Totally naive.

18 May 2017

How to spot Fake News in the Fake South African media

By Mike Smith

19th of May 2017

About 18 months ago two burly white Afrikaans males followed a taxi with four young coloured passengers home after they enjoyed a night out at a night club in Cape Town.

One of the coloured passengers was a bright university student and he was the main target of the two white Afrikaners, who accused him of starting trouble at the night club. A case of mistaken identity. He was not the guy. The other three passengers were a brother and sister pair and a girl friend.

Nevertheless, the two white Afrikaner males then blocked the taxi in when it entered a Cul de Sac and laid into the defenceless coloured victim in what the judge later called a "brutal and merciless" assault. They only went for his head. Punched and kicked him into a coma. He later died in hospital.

Said the Judge: “It seems the main aim of the accused was to kick and beat the deceased incessantly on the head and nowhere else on the body."

A pathologist who examined the young coloured student’s body said he had a brain injury usually only seen in people killed in car accidents.
They also assaulted the other passengers and the driver when they tried to intervene.

This was a disgusting utterly racist crime and usually something like this would be in the South African media for weeks, being milked for every drop of anti white racist propaganda value possible...yet it hardly made headlines. Why?

See...The whole story I just told above was Fake News. I reversed the races of the perpetrators and the victim. The two killers were actually coloureds and the victim was a young white Afrikaans student at Stellenbosch University. THAT is why it didn’t make any headlines. THAT is why the media won’t call it a “Racist Crime” and won’t show the faces of the perpetrators or mention their race except in a small tabloid on page six.

Two to be sentenced for fatal assault on Maties graduate

The two killers with their lawyers: Juane Jacobs, 37 (back) and Brent Henry, 40 (front)

The victim, Carl Schoombie (27)

Mayor spends almost R2 million on KFC

By Mike Smith

18th of May 2017

I honestly do not know why the DA calls this "shocking expenses”...it is just usual, normal typical...Fucking typical !

Emfuleni Local Municipality Mayor Simon Mofokeng, who is a member of the African National Congress (ANC), has been accused by the Democratic Alliance (DA) of spending nearly two million rand on KFC, Nandos and hotel bills during his previous stint at the helm of Sedibeng District Municipality.

Mayor spent R1.7m on KFC and hotels

That is not all…”Mayor Mofokeng's claims for luxury hotel stays and his appetite for fast food, was in addition to strange fuel claims which were submitted for his private car, as well as claims for car hire – despite him having an official mayoral vehicle.”

"It is shameful that Mayor Mofokeng, a senior ANC leader, continues to dine in the lap of luxury, when so many in the municipality go hungry. It is high time that Mayor Mofokeng is fired by the ANC."