03 February 2017
For the last time, we are all settlers in South Africa
By Mike Smith
3rd of February 2017
The Bushmen got their loincloths in a knot again.
Don’t call us coloureds. We are Khoisan
They don’t want to be called “Coloureds” anymore, they want to be known as “Khoisan” and they want to be recognized as a nation and the only indigenous people of South Africa.
They want to be included in “land redistribution”, which means they want some of the white people’s land stolen by the ANC and they want to be included in “Black Economic Empowerment” which means that they want some of the Free Shit paid for by the white taxpayer’s money stolen by the ANC. Nothing new.
Incidentally and funny enough is that the Bushman language is not one of the eleven official languages of South Africa, but the motto on the South African coat of arms (which shows two bushmen meeting and talking) is “ǃke e: ǀxarra ǁke” which apparently means “Diverse people unite” in the now extinct language of the "ǀXam" people.
Just shows you how deurmekaar and stuffed up the modern New (improved) South Africa is.
Of course the man who designed the coat of arms was not a Bushman at all or even a Kaffir, but a white Afrikaans libtard guy (not sure what is worse) called Iaan Bekker and the meaning of the motto comes from the white German man Wilhelm Bleek’s translations from the 19th century, which is a bit suspect seeing that when the SABC interviewed modern Bushmen and asked them what “ǃke e: ǀxarra ǁke” meant they said it meant something like taking a wee in the bush.
This is only the start of the many ironies and problems, seeing that this language was practically extinct until (as I saw in a documentary) some white British linguists taught the Bushmen their own language back to them from tape recordings made in the first part of the 20th century.
Further, there is no “Khoi-san” nation in history. The Khoi-Khoi were the Hottentots and the San were the Bushmen. Two distinct groups with different cultures, beliefs and languages.
But let us refer to them in this non-existent terminology to make things simpler. So are the “Khoi-San” groups the first human’s in SA then?
As I have mentioned before, the answer is an unequivocal “No”,… not even by a long shot.
Contrary to common belief, The Khoi-San are NOT the first South Africans and also migrated into South Africa. The above article is from a black man, not that it gives it more credibility, but because if it was from a white man he would undoubtedly have been labeled a “racist”…so I am just saying.
Some of the oldest homo sapien sapien (Khoi-San) bones and fossils we can find are around 200 000 years old and were found in Ethiopia not South Africa. Academic studies into earlier humans shows us that the Khoi-San migrated into South Africa around 20 000 years ago via the area we call Botswana today.
Besides, the original humans who inhabited South Africa, Homo Ergaster, Homo Gautengensis and Homo Naledi died out and went extinct LONG ago and blacks made it VERY clear that they want nothing to do with Homo Naledi. It is NOT their ancestor.
Homo Naledi an attempt to ‘link black ancestors to baboons’
Of course the Bantu migration was from around the equator; the areas of West and Central Africa and the reason of their migration were the stronger tribes driving them ever further down so that the ones living in SA today are the weakest of the weak and the most cowardly of the cowardly. The word “Xhosa” is in the Zulu language synonymous with the word “coward”.
Nevertheless, it goes further, because these “Khoi-san-bushmen-hottentot-coloureds-halfnaaitjies” are nowadays not living in South Africa anymore, but mostly in Botswana where they get virtually no recognition whatsoever and are severely oppressed by the black Ba-Tswanas and their pleas practically ignored.
Which brings us to another problem seeing that their land was not stolen by whites, but by blacks during the early 19th century period of the Zulu king Shaka’s “Mfecane” (Defecane in Sotho), meaning “Great scattering” when the Zulus chased weaker black tribes all over the country like the Sothos who fled into the Maluti mountains, the Swazis and the Ndebeles/Matabeles who backtracked north again where they came from and, as I have mentioned, the cowardly Xhosas who fled south.
These Xhosas have done so much killing and fucking amongst these “Khoi-san-bushmen-hottentot-coloureds-halfnaaitjies” that they even adopted the clicks from their languages and that is why Nelson Mandela (a Xhosa-Khoisan halfnaaitjie) looked more like a Makwakkie than a black man.
Recently a black entrepreneur, Maynard Mamnyowa, caused a bit of a stir when he wrote a supporting article called Colonisation; Not Just a European Malady: Blacks Stole the Land Too!
He bluntly called these land lies of the EFF and ANC, “a scapegoat for the ANC, a populist ticket for the EFF, and an excuse for bad governance and poor delivery from the government.”
You see, this is where another problem comes in, because in the beliefs of the “Khoi-san-bushmen-hottentot-coloureds-halfnaaitjies”no human being can own any land or even an animal. It all belongs to !Xu, their “big-god-supreme-being- wavela uMain-ou-thingamajig”.
So where does this sudden interest in owning land and Free Shit come from?
Besides they were nomadic hunter gatherers who never settled in one place for very long and apart from their bones and rock paintings, left nothing behind to show us that they were even there. No title deed, no receipt of acquisition, nada, nothing, zilch. So their claim to the land they were just passing through at the time is a load of, well…BOLLOCKS.
I have sorted out this nonsense a long time ago in Part 32 of Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box: Who does the Land belong to? and in this article; Mike Smith: Does South Africa belong to the Khoi-San only? , but often have to redo it, because the problem with blacks is that they WANT to believe this rubbish that they are indigenous to South Africa and at least indigenous to Africa therefore the whole of Africa is black and belongs to them and them only.
However when you point out to blacks that whites were in North and even South Africa thousands of years ago (long before them) and settled in places completely uninhabited by them you get that blank Kaffir stare and the thick-lipped response, “Africa for Africans…”
Fucking brain dead morons. You cannot reason with retards.
Even the most liberal of academics cannot refute and have to agree with the DNA evidence that we South Africans (Black, White, Indian Bushmen…all of us) are not originally from South Africa… We are all from settler backgrounds in South Africa