"I have learned to be content no matter what happens to me. I know what it’s like not to have what I need. I also know what it’s like to have more than I need. I have learned the secret of being content no matter what happens. I am content whether I am well fed or hungry. I am content whether I have more than enough or not enough. I can do everything by the power of Christ. He gives me strength." (Philippians 4:11-13)
By Mike Smith
19th of October 2016
If you look at what Paul says in the Bible above then it is a good thing to be happy with what you've got no matter what. But how content should we be with an oppressive government hell bent on your destruction?
Satan and his army of Liberation Theologians in their eucumenical temples have often used Romans 13: 1-7 which says that we should obey government, because "there is no authority except that which God has established" to pacify and pussify us to further their diabolical agendas unopposed.
But what if that authority tells us to disobey God, deny God and worship Satan or at least practice Satanic beliefs like free sex, abortion, etc? Should we obey? Here we have a massive contradiction in the Bible.
In 1765, British jurist Sir William Blackstone said in his commentaries on English law: "No human laws are of any validity if contrary to God's Law.”
In 1860, John Wingate Thornton developed this thought further: "We may very safely assert these two things in general without undermining government: One is, that no civil rulers are to be obeyed when they enjoin things that are inconsistent with the commands of God. All such disobedience is lawful and glorious . . . All commands running counter to the declared will of God the Supreme Legislator of heaven and earth are null and void, and therefore disobedience to them is a duty, not a crime."
In 1603, speaking before Parliament, even King James I, who gave us the King James Bible, recognized that a ruler's authority has limits: "A king ceases to be a king, and degenerates into a tyrant, as soon as he leaves off to rule according to his laws."
Tyrannical authority is not from God, but from Satan. Consider the words of the Prophet Hosea: "Set the trumpet to thy mouth. He shall come as an eagle against the house of God because they have transgressed my covenant, and trespassed against my law . . . They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not. (Hosea 8:14)
Further, God cannot contradict himself by opposing King David who killed the husband of Bathsheba. Should David not have been opposed simply because he was king? Expecting people to be content with and obey a government that is unreasonable, cruel, and unjust is robbing God of His own justice and goodness.
God is the supreme authority. In other words, any civil authority not set up and sanctioned by God and not enforcing His laws is not a legitimate authority, at least not over Christians.
In the old Testament we see that Daniel was a very high government official in Babylon. His was an Old Testament example of "being in the world, but not of the world." Daniel recognized that his people's captivity was a God-sent chastisement. Yet, he drew the line when a "federal law" prohibited him from praying to his God.
Therefore...Contentment with Satanic tyranny is a filthy disease. Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God. It is your DUTY as a Christian to oppose such a government.
However...When you look at different nations, their people and their governments then one can quickly become entangled in an enigmatic Gordian knot, because it appears as if the governments often act differently to how the people really are. However these people voted for their governments and hold them accountable, or at least should, but often don’t. One can then deduce that they are indeed in agreement with their government or content with their decisions and actions.
The reason I mention this is, because I often hear from blacks that they are not all criminal, corrupt, uselessly inefficient, etc like the ANC and that we should not generalise. They tell me that most blacks are just normal people who want to get on with life, yet these very same blacks vote to 90% for the ANC in election after election.
If blacks are all so good and “normal” then why do the townships look so filthy and where does all the violent crime come from? Since 1995 there has been a 3000% increase in prisoners serving life sentences in South Africa
How wrong is it then to generalize? Sure there are a few individuals, who are the exceptions, but that is the main point; The exception proves the existence of the general rule.
However, one can see this phenomenon amongst other nations as well. For instance, during Apartheid I often heard from Europeans like the British and the Dutch that they actually supported us and were against their government’s policies of sanctions and boycotts against their brothers and sisters in South Africa.
It must have been a very quiet opposition, because we never saw any counter demonstrations against the Anti-Apartheid Movements of the world. We never saw any Americans, Canadians, Australians or New Zealanders standing up for white Christian South Africans against their countries’ policies of sports boycotts, disinvestment and sanctions. We never saw any Dutch, French or German person standing up for their Christian brethren in South Africa when they boycotted our fruit, wine, meat etc in their supermarkets.
The deduction can be made that these people were content with what their governments were doing, because they kept on voting for them and never opposed them.
How does one explain this? Self interest maybe? Laissez-faire? Cannot be, because why interfere with South Africa in the first place?
Be it as it may, how wrong is it then to generalize and, for instance, say, “The Dutch were all against us?”
Now look at the picture on the right and the Italian source:
Dutch School Children submitting to Allah
|Native Dutch children praying to Allah in the mosque|
The visit to the Mosque was part of a sick liberal curriculum with a project called “Other Cultures”. The Imam, Maulana Noorani Tahier Wagid Hosain, warmly welcomed the children and responded in an entertaining and understandable way to their questions. He made them repeat the Arabic letters, of course praised Islam as a religion of peace and love and then, almost as if in a game, he showed them how to pray like Muslims.
Now I can assure you, not all the Dutch people are content with shit like this. Sure there are some who are against it. However...where is the massive outcry? Where are the demonstrations against their government for forcing this onto their children?
Look, the Dutch are mostly wonderful, sophisticated and intelligent people known for their cheese, architecture, eating chips with mayo and peanut sauce and of course their massive dykes, the ones keeping the North Sea out, I mean. How is it that people who have survived for centuries by keeping the mighty waves of the North Sea out are unable to keep the waves of Islam gushing over their country out?
They must be content with it, because I don’t see them storming the Binnenhof in the Hague.
Now it is one thing to criticize the lame, liberal Dutch for their slackness to sort out the infestation in their country and one can even be permitted to have some Schadenfreude for what they did to South Africa, but let us look at our own slackness; our own white apathy, uselessness and contentment in South Africa.
Since 1994, under a tyrannical Marxist government, there has been close on 4000 white farmers brutally tortured and killed, about 80,000 whites murdered in their homes, thousands upon thousands of white women raped, yet where is the resistance of the white people in South Africa?
Sure there are some who have a blog or two and are alerting and informing the world. They actually have a few followers too. Very few are actively taking self defence and shooting lessons. There is absolutely no combined effort to put a fund together to get people tactically trained up. A few sheep bitch and moan around the braai on Saturday. Most are more concerned about the state of the Rugby than the state of the nation. Hlaudi Motsoeneng is still the head of the SABC and Zuma is still in charge of the country!!! Why???
When Dan Roodt organises a protest march he is lucky if 300 people turn up. Carel Boshoff originally estimated that after 15 years he would have 60,000 people in Orania. Today he is lucky if he can count a thousand. Sundays the churches are empty and Saturdays the Rugby stadiums are full. People moan about the price of petrol, the price of cigarettes, the degradation, the ANC...but further than moaning it also doesn’t go.
How wrong is it then to generalize and deduce that the whites in South Africa are useless, lazy and apathetic idiots content with their situation?
Is God punishing them for their apathy towards tyranny? Prove me wrong. Where are the masses of whites demonstrating at the Union Buildings or parliament? Why are our streets not filled with very angry Christian whites opposing the ANC? What are we doing wrong that we just cannot get the people together? If an idiotic potato farmer can get 200,000 “Mighty Men” together at a concert in 2009 and 400,000 in 2010 then what are we doing wrong? What are the alternatives? Can we really blame God and the world for ignoring our plight when we show them how apathetic and content we are with the New (improved) South Africa?
It is one thing to say that the blacks are voting for the ANC in election after election and keeping them in charge, but what are we doing? Are we not doing exactly the same? We are keeping the ANC in power with our apathy and content. We have to do what God wants us to do. We have to oppose the tyrannical and oppressive ANC regime in every which way possible.