17 August 2016
How NOT to try and cure race relations in SA
17 th of August 2016
According to UNISA chancellor and former judge Bernard Ngoepe Race relations in South Africa are so bad that it could lead to civil war
I fully agree with the honourable and learned judge. Race relations in the country are now far worse than they were under Apartheid.
I would just like to know what did all that BULLSHIT at the TRC or Truth and Reconciliation Council (that he was part of) help? Werent they supposed to have fixed relations between black and white and make us all hold hands and sing Kumbaya together?
Not to mention the millions Ngoepe, Tutu and Dr. Alex Boraine got and the other millions wasted on a “tranedal” spectacle also known as “The Des and Alex Show”.
You would think that somebody who failed at reconciliation between races in South Africa would STFU and STFD, but not our learned judge. No he has a new absurd and shallow method to stop “racism” and that is to criminalise it. In other words take out the clauses of “Freedom of Speech” and “Freedom of Expression” from the constitution and throw anybody in prison that offends a black person.
Nobody is happier than me about this law. I cannot wait for it. Finally we will see a definition of “Race” in order to define “Racism”, because for years the Libtards have told us that race does not exist and is only a social construct.
However racism never stopped the ANC of using it against the 9% minority whites in South Africa (and the coloureds and the Indians). In fact, 70% of the Western Cape’s people are white or coloured and are paying 90% of the taxes, but they are racially discriminated against through BEE, AA, racial quotas in university entry and sports, etc by an ANC central government. High time that the Western Cape declares independence.
Nevertheless, I know and can see that this is not what the judge meant by racism, because in his mind only blacks can be racially discriminated against and can be victims of “racism”.
In fact the 80% blacks in the country need draconian laws to protect them against the 9% whites that might offend them...or is it the other way around?
Maybe the judge’s words actually mean that it is better to stick the 9% racist whites in prison or concentration camps to protect them than to have a civil war and let them be massacred by panga-weilding blacks, because in the absurd Azania mania, taking racial offence is a valid excuse to kill someone.
Law academic Joel Modiri, from the University of Pretoria, said racism could be seen as a psychological issue which required reconciliation, but it could also be about structural and power inequalities and addressing a conflict created by "the very arrival of whites in this country".
He said: "What kind of freedom is this that blacks need protection from whites?"
See? These new anti-racism laws and bills will be a one way street. They are only there to protect blacks against white racism and not the other way around. To blacks “Freedom” and “Liberation” does not mean the same as for us. As long as there is any trace of a white person in the country the blacks will never have “Freedom”. They will never have their “Uhuru”.
“The gaze that the colonized subject casts at the colonist's sector is a look of lust, a look of envy Dreams of possession. Every type of possession: of sitting at the colonist's table and sleeping in his bed, preferably with his wife.” Franz Fanon, Wretched of the Earth.
Nevertheless it will be interesting to see this law in action; which offensive words they will banish. You cannot ban words without banning the entire language. If you ban “Kaffir”, people will invent new words such as “nog-nog”, “spear chucker”, “papvreter”, “Marmite Monster”, etc. Eventually you have to ban the entire language. Good luck with that.