25 February 2016

Were Jesus and the ancient Israelites Black?


By Mike Smith

25th of February 2016

Every now and again we get a Afrocentric Black  Troll, a filthy Tokoloshe who slithers out from underneath his rock and comes on here to spread his poison and disinfo.

Recently we have had one Sello Puo who stated on This Thread that “The true Jews, are not white.The true Jews of Jesus times were not white. So you also adopted Christianity like others.“

and further..."I am not that kind that will be taught that Jesus was white for I know that the original Jews never looked anything like what you see today. They had brownish skin like brass. Even though they had long hair but was more like a wool."


I like guys like Sello. It always gives me a chance to unmask their lies and bullshit. So here goes.

Where does it come from?

Dr. Cain Hope Felder
The Satanic black moron  responsible for this Afrocentric hi-jacking of Jesus and other rubbish that the Israelites were black is Dr. Cain Hope Felder who wrote the "The Original African Heritage Study Bible" (Winston Publishing Company, 1993).

His first name says it all, but according to his idiotic lies and propaganda whites are not mentioned in the Bible and Adam, Moses, Abraham, Noah, etc, …even Jesus, were all black.

Truth is that the Bible is full of text that confirm the Israelites of old as whites.

Lev 10:6 Moses instructed his brother and sons not to let their hair hang loose. How can you let peppercorn hair of blacks “hang loose”?

2Samuel 14:26 Samson cut his long hair only once a year, and then only because it was so heavy. When he weighed it out, it came to five pounds! I want to see Kaffir peppercorns grow like that. What a joke.

Isiah 54:4 Translates blushing as “You won’t be put to shame”. However, the Afrikaans Bible (1983) that was translated from the original Hebrew and Greek states, “Wees nie bevrees nie, want jy sal nie beskaamd staan nie; en vrees geen skande nie, want jy sal nie nodig hê om te bloos nie; maar jy sal die skande van jou jonkheid vergeet en aan die smaad van jou weduweeskap nie meer dink nie.”

Bloos=Blush...further...

Jeremiah 6:15 Specifically says that blacks cannot blush. “Are they ashamed of their detestable conduct? No, they have no shame at all; they do not even know how to blush. So they will fall among the fallen; they will be brought down when I punish them," says the LORD.”

It is common sense that blacks cannot blush.

Song of Solomon 5:10

“My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.”


How does Jesus look?

Rev 1:13-14 tells us exactly how Jesus “The son of man” looks like. Blonde hair and blue eyes. “The hair on his head was white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.”


But there are lots more evidence that the Israelites of old were white.

The English painter William Holman Hunt (1827-1910) did a lot of research before he painted “Christ and the two Marys” (see above). He even went to Israel and found the original descendants of the Israelites and he found many had blonde or red hair and blue or green eyes. Whenever he painted Jesus, he was White and had long hair.

Sir Leonard Woolley the archaeologist who excavated the ancient Sumerian city of Ur found that the people from there were typical Nordic type whites, Caucasians, with longish heads, indistinguishable from the whites of today.

Genesis 11:31 tells us that father Abraham and his entire family was from Ur.

Rev. Prof. A.H. Sayce Linguist and archeologist, who was professor at Oxford and could read and write about 20 different languages including many ancient languages, also found that the ancient Israelites were whites from Sumer, land between the Euphrates and the Tigris, where Eden, the REAL cradle of (white) mankind, was.

This is confirmed by Genesis 2:14. “The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Ashur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.”

Sir William Flinders Petrie Father of the systematic methodology of archeology and preservation of artifacts and the teacher of Howard Carter who discovered Tutankhamen’s grave, also found that the Egyptians and the Israelites were of a Caucasian Dynastic race who invaded Egypt from Sumer and found the first dynasty there.

Conclusion: You be the judge.

134 comments:

  1. Anonymous1:29 pm

    They want to try and take EVERYTHING away from whites...wishful thinking on their part, and all in vain. Our Father recognizes, and knows each and every one of his children.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous1:40 pm

    Glad you brought this up. The fight today is against whites, world wide. As we see in Africa, USA, UK and Europe.
    You have said it before Mike, they will still come ask us to teach them how to implement Apartheid.
    Yip, it is a reality. It is not only the whites of SA that are suffering, the plan is to end the white race, world wide.
    Why they hate us....?
    In Genesis 1, God creates earth. Note, important, after every creation: IT WAS GOOD....!!!
    On day 6 God created man (to his image) and told them to fill the earth.
    Gen 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.
    Then God rested on the 7th day.
    After that, God created Eden. It could have been a year or 100 later, but definitely after the 7th day.
    In Gen 2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.
    This is the man that eventually left Eden, and was banished to earth. This is the white race that blacks want to wipe off the face of earth.
    God did not create the blacks. They are not His image. And very little about them are good.
    Whites create, invent make laws they live by and go forward in life.
    Blacks burn, rape, murder, destroy and bend the laws for personal gain.
    Nothing about that is good.
    If my theory is wrong, God will forgive me. Because that is how I interpret the Bible. I was not taught this, I made my own conclusions.
    Noddy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:07 pm

      WHY they hate us...? you ask. Simple: Pure, undiluted jealousy....and fear!! "THEY" feel immensely threatened by ol' whitey's capability and creative nature, for which they can only respond with utter
      resentment, hatred and violence!(pass the violin please...sob!).They hate us because we see through their pathetic lies. We laugh at their childish inabilities. They hate us because we avoid them whenever possible....and they cannot stand being ignored!! They crave our attention, hence the racial name calling and threats...YAWN!! They want us off this earth, yet at the same time are scared to let us go. They want us to stay here and nurture them, but on THEIR terms!! You see, the best way to deal with stiff opposition is to either control it.....or destroy it!

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:14 pm

      There are 2 creation evens mentioned in the bible. God created mankind on the 6th day in Gen 1. He then rests and in Gen 2 after he had rested, does he create Adam and Eve.

      Incidentally the word day is translated from the Hebrew word YOM and it also means era.

      If I was to say...
      1) the word was created over 6 days, or
      2) the world was created over six eras
      In both cases I would say the world was created over six YOM.

      Suddenly the creationism vs. evolution debate is nullified with the truth.

      Fact is that Adam was only created in Genesis 2 and this was after the creation of mankind in genesis 1.

      Check Gen 2. Adam was creation AFTER GOD had rested on the 7th day and we know that Adam was created 6,000 years ago, because his genealogy is given to us.
      ..........

      The fact is that our bibles have been corrupted (mistranslated) by the Babylonian scribes that returned with the tribe of Judah from captivity in Babylon. (Book of Ezra)

      Other mistranslated words include

      Serpent - The Hebrew word is Nakash and it means ENCHANTER as well. Which one fits best.

      Touch - Refers to touch this tree (Eden)and you will die. Hebrew word is NAGA and it means to lie with a woman.

      Earth - The Hebrew word is ERETS and it means land or country. As in the whole country was under water.

      Seed - Hebrew word ZEHRA and it means OFFSPRING.
      Check the parable of the sower. He sows his seed (Godly seed) and in the evening the evil one came and sows his seed amongst them (Mat 13:25) This parable refers to the seed/OFFSPRING of Eve and the seed/OFFSPRING of satan being in perpetual warfare until the end.

      This is why the satanic hordes are pushing for the destruction of the white races.

      But I leave you with this.

      Jesus: "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled."

      The satanic hordes like to point to this verse and say. Look the bible is false, because that generation passed and Jesus has not returned, BUT the word generations is translated from the Greek word GENEA and it means RACE.

      Jesus said that the white race will not disappear before his return, even though the satanic hordes are very actively trying to destroy the white race.

      Victory is ours and it is guaranteed. Rejoice I tell you. Have a beer and rejoice.

      A4

      Delete
    3. Anonymous5:28 pm

      After you had your beer A4, please go on. Is it possible for you to talk some more about Touch this tree(Eden)? And what happens to mixed blood from Adam/EVE and mankind?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous9:58 am

      Something I wrote on a conspiracy site a while ago.

      https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiBxPLm9prLAhUFthQKHR3yC04QFgg5MAQ&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.godlikeproductions.com%2Fforum1%2Fmessage2523834%2Fpg1&usg=AFQjCNHI_IvkzZH5k9OzZbXT4Xb9PA179A

      A4

      Delete
    5. Anonymous2:38 am

      Thanks for that. So basically we should have no communion or even have anything to do with these satan seed trees? That is why we are sitting where we are today, the world forced the traitors of SA to make pacts and negotiate with them, hence we lost our paradise and began to feel supposed guilt.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous1:45 pm

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Gates

    The Egyptian 'Book of Gates', a fresco which depicts the various races according to the Egyptians divides the races into four:

    1) Libyan - clearly light-skinned in the fresco.
    2) Nubian - clearly black
    3) Asiatic - also light-skinned and who be from the Middle East
    4) Egyptians - darker, but not black, the copts or coptic Christians in modern Egypt are supposed to the descendants of the ancient Egyptians and not the Arabs who displaced most of them

    Personally, I have met a Coptic Christian in Egypt, he was my tour guide and he looked like a southern European.

    Also, many of the Arabs are also very light skinned, particularly the upper classes.

    They are Caucasian, as are some North African groups, Arabians and Northern Indians. The term 'Caucasian'refers to the skull type and skeletal structure.

    Freddy Mercury for instance was Indian but yet looked 100% white.

    The same applies in medical trials, they classify 'Northern Indians' as also being Caucasian.

    That's why 'white' and 'Caucasian' are not quite the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:17 pm

      The mummy of the biblical Josef was found in the royal tombs of Egypt.

      http://www.mayimachronim.com/yosef-and-yuya-does-archaeological-evidence-prove-the-biblical-narrative-of-joseph/

      He was white.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:10 am

      Anon 11:17

      Yes, I can believe that. Look at modern Syrians today, many are white but because of their religion and culture, they are considered 'Arab', even though they are not from Arabia.

      Also, look at Sadamme Hussein's old deputy who was Christian he would be considered white too and was from Iraq.

      And as mentioned earlier, the Egyptians depicted Libyans (North Africans) and Middle Easterners as having light skin or olive skin like many southern Europeans who live in warmer climates and are exposed to the sun.

      Delete
    3. Tariq Aziz was Assyrian and a Catholic.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous2:31 pm

    Spot on mike, I would just like to add something.

    I come across a lot of Afrikaans and English folk who believes in turning the other cheek as taught by Jesus. They believe we should turn the other cheek in the face of a racial attack too. They forgive them when the savage breaks in to their homes and rapes their own daughter. I have seen this with my own two eyes. ( unbelievable)

    Firstly if you can except that the bible is actually a book for the Israelites( whites) and when Jesus said be disciples on to the lost tribes and go to the corners of the earth he did not mean blacks and pakistani's and what not. He meant the lost tribes of "Israel(whites)...Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph and Benjamin,


    What they cant seem to understand is that you are supposed to turn the cheek for your brothers and other races are not our biological brothers. The 12 white tribes are.

    I believe that this along with legalizing of gay marriages and bringing gay preachers in to churches was a international attempt at weakening Israel(whites)in order to stop our relentless pace at attaining our promised international inheritance

    It was the beginning of what we see today here in SA when missionaries started to convert Zulus and Xhosas back in the day in to Christians. Why are the black Christians not turning the other cheek?

    However they still pray to their ancestors regularly when butchering animals( Inside knowledge )and most of them are reverting completely back in to their old believes.

    They dont see muti like a herbal/medical drink. Whites do because we believe in medicine. They see muti as a magical/spiritual concoction.

    We need to separate ourselfs from them completely. Not hold their hands and pray with them at Tukkies. They come with masks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:14 am

      the 'lost tribes' were those that went north and excluded the southern tribes of Judah and Benjamin.

      If a black or pink man follows the 'Word' and rejects 'the traditions of man' i.e. pagan customs (also includes white man's customs), then he is my brother - black, pink, yellow or white. And no I am not a liberal and far from being one.
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    2. Anonymous6:04 am

      FW, moet nie dit aanraak wat onheilig is nie.
      Die nuwe Jerusalem het net 12 poorte, en op daardie poorte is net die name van die 12 stamme/nageslag van Jackob/IsraEL daar op en net ons mag daar in gaan, mits jy bekeer, gedoop is en glo in ons Verlosser. Die ander sal nie ingaan nie hulle sal buite bly, daar is voor elke poort n Engel wat daar kyk en seker maak die regte uitverkore volk gaan in (Openbaring).

      DD

      Delete
    3. Willempie1:33 pm

      Kyk, hierdie "draai die ander wang" storie is 'n resep om jou kop afgeklap te kry. Ek glo eerder in die klap terug metode...

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:22 pm

      Jesus himself said that he only came for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Mat 15:24

      One of the bigfest lies today is that Jesus was a Jew. He sent time in Judea and Judeans were a bunch of different races together. Same as South African/American etc. cannot denote one race only.

      The king of Judea at the time of Jesus' birth was king Herod and he was an Idumean and he was king, because Judea was majority Idumean.

      Jesus was not a Jew.
      http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/jesusjew.htm

      Delete
    5. Willempie ek het nog altyd geglo dit beteken draai jou teenstander se ander wang om hom NOG 'n taai klap te gee...

      Delete
  5. Anonymous2:41 pm

    See JP's House of Israel South Africa blog. He had an article on black Egypt last week. It is to long to post here. Go read.

    DNA tests on the mummies shows clearly European. Even the Faro in the museum have long thin blond hair. You can also see art that depicts white rulers and kings trampling black slaves. Yes there was a black Faro but it was thousands of years in to the future. It would be the same as giving Obama credit for all of the USA.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm pretty sure if you left blacks' dreadlocks grow for a year they would weigh in the "pounds" Kilos as opposed to white hair.

    Hair as white as wool doesn't make any sense at his age, so wool refers to texture of his hair.

    William Hunt did a lot of research did he? Did he ignore that before MichaelAngelo all depictions around the world of Mary and Jesus are black? Even in the vatican.

    Of course the bible the satanic deception that would be sown among us, that's why John 4:24 says God is Spirit and should be worshiped in spirit which is what blacks do.

    Personally I don't care if Jesus looked black white or Arab.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First of all Dreads take YEARS to grow, not One Year.
      Secondly dreads are unnatural manipulation of black hair to look more white and imitate the white Jesus's long hair.

      Take a true African from Central Africa, not a mulato 25% white African American and let them naturaly without manipulation grow their peppercorns long. Good luck with that. You are the uncrowned beasts of the field. show me where does a black man have a crown in his hair.

      Another lie...where did Michelangelo depict Jesus and Mary as black??? Where? give link.




      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:28 pm

      Don't forget Mike they also built the pyramids and shit and that the first man on Mars was also black.

      We will see more and more of this as the destruction in SA continues, the old tactic of "hey we like you actually white man, we don't have a problem with you, please don't leave us. We love you". All while the MSM tries to make whitey feel guilty and sorry for these sacks of useless genocidal shit.

      Hey Moloto, we don't believe anything you say anymore, we won't believe another lie that comes dripping like poison from your black maws anymore.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous9:34 pm

      The earliest known depiction of Jesus is now located in the British Museum and like all other depictions of Jesus shows him as being white.

      The Jews and Middle Easterners are a Caucasian race, not Negroid, race is determined by skull and skeletal type.

      The same goes with modern Syrians and people in that region, Iran, much of Arabia and even northern India. They are all Caucasian.

      The Negroid races were from further down South, in Ethiopia and Nubia and the Egyptians defined them as a separate (and much darket) race from themselves as also clearly distinguished them from lighter-skinned Middle Easterners and 'Libyans'.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous9:36 pm

      And as as been mentioned earlier, DNA testing has shown the Pharaohs to have European DNA.

      The mummy of Ramses clearly shows Caucasian features, long nose, high cheekbones with light coloured straight hair.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous8:45 am

      Definitely not the same species as whites, look, they can step over electric fencing easy peasy. Rather go for reinforced slash wire Guatanamo style on your perimeters. And also big and small dogs, and sensor beams and 24/7 remote security, and carry a gun that you know how to shoot with and are prepared to do so.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCzXE7LMQ64

      Delete
    6. Anonymous11:41 pm

      Mohau above is a classical case of the lack of logic that blacks possess. The verse specifically states that Jesus' hair was AS WHITE as wool. Thus only the white property of wool applies.

      If I was to say that Mohau is a black as tar. It means simply that....he is very black. I cannot now say that he smells like tar, or that he has sticky fingers like tar. although being black, he probably does have, hehehehe.

      Secondly the verse not only says that Jesus' hair was white, BUT HIS HEAD was white as well.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous2:53 pm

    Looking at how blacks behave today here in SA and in fact how they behave themselves across the world, there can be no doubt that these creatures are spawned from a very evil and destructive seed. If I'm not mistaken these same traits are also from old Nick himself. Just look back at the black man's limited history and you will see the truth.

    Pity the white man has been deceived by the rulers and masters of this world to believe that these blacks are indeed man. Who will benefit most from the destruction of the mainly Christian white man and his soul? That old deceiver and liar, that old devil Lucifer.

    Blacks are nothing more than the destroyers of creation, nothing more than the pawns of a grand chess game for the souls of man. They serve a good purpose actually, they will inadvertently bring those lost sheep back to the fold and back to the Father.

    Beasts of the field, for them there is nothing past this life. That is why they are so scared of death, they know deep in their black stone cold hearts that there is nothing more for them once this plane of existence ends. Nothing but darkness, nothing but black.

    Soulless and uncaring cretins. Unthinking and unknowing, marching on to the sound of the world, on towards the abyss of oblivion...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:06 am

      Please revisit your understanding of satan/Lucifer. Your understanding, like most, is based on myth and common incorrect teaching - not on what the Scriptures state. Warning - This topic is not for the faint hearted or for the believer with a shallow faith. If you are not really interested in the Truth, don't go there.
      Faith Walker.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous5:25 am

      Enlighten us then Walker Texas Ranger. You seem to know all there is to know. Seriously, who or what is satan then. I drank my heart medicine this morning, I promise.

      Demystify the myth.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:30 am

      Firstly, your sarcasm is not appreciated. You do not know me. I accept that I was a piece of trash before I chose to walk this path, so reserve your judgement.

      Anyway here is a very brief clue:

      The founder of the Church of Satan Alexander Crowley stands by his doctrine of

      ‘Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law’

      What you must understand then, is that if one is not following the ways of YHWH – outlined in Scripture, then by default one is adhering to the satanic way of ‘Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law’. Like it or not – there it is.

      Scripture has this to say:

      Proverbs 14:4
      The backslider in heart shall be filled with his own ways:

      Look at the write up for The Satanic Bible written by Anton LaVey and you will recognise many statements that are ignorantly followed and exhibited unknowingly by people today. You can come to your own conclusion then.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Bible

      Satan is not some bogeyman with horns and a tail. I have a lot of literature available on this subject that clarifies the misunderstanding of who or what satan actually is. If you are up to reading three books give me a mail.
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    4. Ehhhmmm...A few corrections.

      The name is Aleister Crowley not "Alexander Crowley"

      The founder of the Church of Satan was Anton LaVey.

      Aleister Crowley founded Thelema. I have two of his books. "The book of the Law" and "The book of lies"

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:22 am

      A bit over zealous to reply I suppose.
      cheers Mike
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    6. Anonymous10:56 am

      Some entertainment exposing satan:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F83XhHZPHnc&feature=youtu.be

      Faith Walker

      Delete
    7. Anonymous12:26 pm

      May I ask when any of you Satan spotters last attended a church service or supported your local church bazaar? Do you belong to any particular parish?

      Delete
    8. Anonymous5:31 pm

      That is none of your business anon 12:26! Got it? Good! Now fuck off!

      Delete
  8. Anonymous3:17 pm

    King David from whom Jesus came had red hair and blue eyes.

    TSA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:25 am

      Read the letter that Pontius Pilate wrote to Tiberius regarding Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ's appearance is well described in that letter.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:03 pm

      If the illustration in this post is anything to go by, Jesus must have been gay. That prancing around with the bandages is seriously kinky.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous7:26 am

      Anon 3:03pm your mind lives in a sick place you pervert.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous8:36 pm

    Anyways, those blacks that claim they are Christians are delusional. Those that I spoke to have a warped idea of what Christianity is and believe in their own invented idea of Christianity. Now this may not be the case with all of them but, I am certain that the majority don't really understand most parts of the Bible or willingly refuse to understand it.


    If they were true Christians or even true Jews, they would jave understood what their position is here in this world. Or perhaps deep inside they know this hence, the onslaught.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Google Philidelphia Trumpet and read the book "USA and UK in prophesy" to see who the lost tribes of Israel are. Good article Mike as always.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Poor Cain just doesn't have the intellect to see his folly. Nowhere in Scripture does God equate black with purity, actually quite the opposite. White is always the chosen colour in this regard. Why thus would Adam & Eve have been created black? Also, why would Jer.13:23 state: "Can the Cushite change his skin?". The latter can only mean one of two things or both, namely that the Cushite has disdain for his skin and desperately wants to change it, or that the skin colour remains fixed and is incapable of change (like blushing). You guessed it, only one group fits the bill. When compliments are bestowed upon a newly born black child, a paler complexion always gets the remarks of approval. Apart from complexion, this individual shares a few other genetic traits far less desirable: No analytic capability, and thus zero comprehension for cause and effect. This is why all economies under black control go the way of Zimbabwe. The latter is the reason for the inability to assimilate into western culture, and not skin colour. Speaking of Zimbabwe, Bob is one of the darkest complexions on the continent but boasts 6 or 7 university degrees, Zuma on the other end one of the lighter but blessed with the number comprehension of a 3-year old. Hence skin surface emissivity and intellect is not a fundamental criteria for correlation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob was educated by white missionaries to start with , Zuma not . thats a major difference just to start with.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous12:30 am

    Mike

    No need to authorize this comment.

    Earlier I asked about your book. Thinking about it now, it wasn't the best question to ask. Of course if you had replied to my questions it would compromise your anonymity I suspect.

    This leaves me with a dilemma, how will I know what book to purchase though?

    Kind Regards
    Heinrich Westphal

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous12:46 am

    This is a war between good and evil! Surely Good surpasses evil! I just feel like the church has not equipped us for this kind of war. It has let us down in a way! Is there not power in the name of "Jesus"! I believe there is! I also hope and pray that people will wake up to what we're dealing with before it's too late. Be safe people...and thank God for a few people that see and know the truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous2:36 am

      In the name means 'in the character'. There is no power when using a name only but rather when one acts 'in the character' of the person - of course this only applies to our Messiah's (Yahushua) character. Otherwise you may as well say 'abracadabra'. ps - names in Scripture have very significant meaning. By changing our Messiah's name to Jesus has destroyed the intended meaning. And no it is not an English translation in our Bibles, it is just another abomination of man. Is Y'Shua 100% correct? we are not sure but it sure has more meaning than the Greek derived 'jesus'.
      If you are interested have a look here, under the heading 'Name above all names'.
      http://www.unleavenedbread.co.za/articles.php

      Faith Walker

      Delete
    2. Anonymous4:15 am

      In his time no one called him Jesus. His name is Yashua. Jesus is from the name Zues. And no names dont change over language bariers.

      How would you respond to me if i called you on your name but instead i took your name mixed it with something that will humiliate you and called and ask you for a something. Will you give it to me? Will you help me out.

      You would find it very difficult even if i was unaware of what i was saying.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous8:43 am

      Boere_Ninja

      Not sure who told you its from Zeus.

      J in Afrikaans is pronounced as Y - ie Jacob, Yakob, its phonetics

      Y & J are / mean the same in many Germanic/Celtic languages and in Hebrew if you go and look at the basque language of Spain which is ancient Hebrew its the same.

      Yashua
      spoken over centuries could easily come to Jesus
      remember pronunciation, Y becomes J - Yashua, yeshua, yishua, Jisua, Jesua, Jisus, Jesus - spelling changes over centuries as well.

      You see the same with arabic languages and how they spell Abraham depending on whether they took arabic, aramic, hebrew, greek or used an older form from Assyria.

      Yair davidy does a good job explaining the phonetics from Hebrew into many European languages.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:11 am

      If anyone is unclear over the names of God, then I suggest you watch the video.

      Behold the nail, behold the hand.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wiBtYITrxM

      A4

      Delete
  14. Anonymous2:01 am

    My friends, we need to avoid this level of argument. The Scriptures are clear that we are all one in our Messiah:

    1 Corinthians 12:27
    Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of you is a part of it.
    Romans 12
    3For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith.
    5 So we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every one members one of another.

    There are two bodies outlined in Scripture:
    1. The body of Messiah Y’Shua of which He is the head and believers make up the body.
    2. The body/statue of Nebuchadnezzar (Babylon). He is represented as the head and all other kingdoms make up the body until the time of the end. The influence in the world today is from the pagan head of Babylon.

    Either you are part of the Body of Y’Shua – following His ways according to all Scripture, or you are part of the Babylonian idol - following the whoring ways of mystery Babylon. You can’t have it both ways – i.e. Claim to be part of the body of Y’Shua but following the practices of the whore – Babylon.

    The colour of our skin is totally irrelevant in the context of the above. We all descend from Noah and his sons. Over time dominant genes and continual inbreeding has resulted in defined differences in looks.

    https://gracethrufaith.com/ask-a-bible-teacher/did-we-all-come-from-noahs-sons/

    There are only two types of people that matter in the greater scheme of things: believers following the narrow path outlined in Scripture and the unjust/wicked non-believers. Skin colour is irrelevant. Revelation has this to say:

    Revelation 22:11
    He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.

    We must step back and see what is really going on in this world. The elitist are fanning this racial fire of division and in the smoke they continue to drive their agenda towards global dominion and rule.

    There is a global attack on the Christian people, which includes the white majority. This is why there appears to be a global white genocide. Christianity must be wiped out as it is a major obstacle in the way of world rulership. This is where we must pay attention – to the real agenda. Uneducated and brainwashed simpletons are being used to bring about this division and destruction. And it is working.

    Article:
    http://www.spectator.co.uk/2013/10/the-war-on-christians/
    Book:
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Global-War-Christians-Anti-Christian/dp/0770437354

    Daniel 12:10
    Many will be purified, made spotless and refined, but the wicked will continue to be wicked. None of the wicked will understand, but those who are wise will understand.

    Faith Walker

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:13 am

      Dis julle wat die ander evangelie verkondig, wat die suurdeeg by die fyn, suiwer, opregte en regverdige meel by gooi om die tekstuur van die brood heeltemal teverander. Die bybel is alteveel keer vertaal en verdraai om julle te pas. Gaan terug na die ou 1933 Afrikaanse Bybel of eens beter die Skrif of die ou Hollandse Bybel, wat ons Vader se Name nog in het.
      Volksgenote mede Boere (Afrikaans of Engels) moet nie laat julle verlei, bedrieg en belieg word nie. Die woord is net bedoel vir die uitverkore direkte, bekeerde nageslag van Jackob/IsraEL. Die Byble/Skrif is net geskryf vir ons, die nageslag van Jockob, Isaak en Abraham. Jy kan nie n Toyota se manual gebruik om n Ford reg temaak nie. Ons Vader se beloftes is net vir ons, Sy Testamente is net vir ons, sy kinders. Jy maak tog nie jou testament uit vir jou tuin jong of buurman of straat myt se kinders nie, nee dis net vir jou eie nageslag, jou eie kinders. Net ons Blanke, die dierekte nageslag kan aanspraak maak op ons Vader se beloftes, verbonde en Testamente, mits jy bekeer, gedood en glo.

      DD

      Delete
    2. Anonymous8:29 am

      Boere_Ninja

      I accept christ but I do NOT accept any books written by the apostles WHY?

      If Christ tells us the law of the prophets, the law of Moses is still true then we must ask why are most of these apostles views in contrast to the old testament?

      Read how these people thought, acted when they were first learning about Christs teachings.

      Sorry but I accept Christ arrived, died for ISRAEL not the world - he specifically mentions Israel no one else.

      The new translations bastardize the truth.

      Sorry but the new Jerusalem cannot come down with the 12 tribes - therefore everything else cannot come to pass.

      I accept Christ, I accept his teachings but I cannot accept his apostles contradictory views of the old testament when the same person who had walked after death specifically said " I have not come to abolish the law of the prophets"

      Something is wrong when you have disciples preaching contradictory stuff to the old testament, no wonder the Jews wanted to murder them.

      Problem is people take verse here, verse there take the bible as one long film, like a long movie - from beginning to end.

      The ENTIRE book is about the salvation of Israel, from Adam, the Noah, To Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, The 12 tribes, Christ coming for them.

      Christ never healed any one but his people, you will notice when people like the Canaanite were healed he never said " I healed you" He said because you had faith, you are healed.

      So I dont need to take verse here, verse there, I read it and go through the bible as one long movie. If you take verse here, verse there you then people get stuck on verses rather than one continues book which ultimately ends with Israel - it specifically says in the end all the nations can only come in through Israel.

      If Israel the white nations are just as equal as every other nation, then why had God gone through such lengths to preserve them? Why did Christ not then travel throughout the world and we have teachings in Africa, Asia? Sure he has missing years but we have no gospel books out of those countries.

      I believe what Christ said "I have not come to abolish the law of the prophets" read what the laws say about the heathen nations.

      And read the books which were also excluded from the bible to see where these nations are from and why they cannot all be saved - the church needs people to pay the rent - abandon their false teachings.

      I.E being gay is ok

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:42 am

      DD 7.13
      I am English speaking so excuse me if I have misunderstood you but it seems that you are implying that only the physical descendants of the 12 tribes are able to partake of the Passover supper (Messiah-Salvation). This is incorrect. Any outsider can as long as they become circumcised first i.e. repent. There is also no possible way for one today to determine if they are direct descendants. It matters not anyway.
      And I use 'The Scriptures' version as well.
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:24 am

      Faith Walker follows the way of Balaam and he does so because he does not understand the parable of the sower.

      24 Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:

      25 But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.

      26 But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
      .....

      The word seed above is translated from the Hebrew word SPERMA. Can you figure it out?
      https://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/Lexicon/Lexicon.cfm?strongs=G4690&t=KJV

      It has nothing to do with plants.

      The Two seed lines.
      http://comparet.christogenea.org/content/cainsatanic-seed-line
      ............

      Faith Walker is deceiver, or he is just misinformed.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous12:56 am

      Deuteronomy 14:2 "For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God, and the LORD hath chosen thee to be a peculiar people unto himself, above all the nations that are upon the earth."

      Exodus 33:16 "So shall we be separated, I and all of Thy people, from all the people that are upon the face of the earth."

      Deuteronomy 7:3 "Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son."

      Joshua 23:12-13 "if ye do in any wise go back and cleave unto the remnant of these nations, even these that remain among you, and shall make marriage with them and go in unto them and they unto you: know for a certainty that they shall be snares and traps unto you and scourges in your sides and thorns in your eyes, until ye perish off from this good land which the Lord your God has given you."

      Ezra 9:2 "For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the HOLY SEED have MIXED themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this TRESPASS."

      Nehemiah 9:2 "And the seed of Israel separated themselves from all STRANGERS and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers."

      Note: "Strangers" above in Nehemiah 9:2 is from Strong's Hebrew word #5236, "nekar", meaning "a foreigner" or an "alien".

      Nehemiah 13:3 "Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the MIXED multitude."

      Hosea 5:7 "They have dealt treacherously against YAHWEH: for they have begotten STRANGE children:"

      Note: The word "strange" from Hosea 5:7 is from Strong's Hebrew word #2114, "zuwr", meaning "a foreigner".

      Deuteronomy 23:2 "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord, even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord."

      Note: The word "bastard" above in Deuteronomy 23:2 is from Strong's Hebrew word #4464, "mamzer", which is defined as "a mongrel" or person of mixed-race.

      Therefore, the true meaning of this passage is that mongrels or offspring of mixed-race cannot become one of Yahweh's people until after the 10th generation. After the 10th generation, the person would have only 1/1024 (0.1% or 0.001) non-Israelite (non-white) blood in their veins. This shows how seriously Yahweh views racial purity.

      A4

      Delete
    6. Anonymous5:46 am

      Anon 12.24
      this is the self same spirit that crucified the Messiah. The same spirit that will call for the death of the 'two witnesses' -soon to come. Why - because they could not fathom the Truth and hated the Truth.
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    7. Anonymous7:53 am

      The 2 witnesses are Israel and Judah.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous7:55 am

      The 3 days they will be dead refers to the great tribulation, when the world will be under the heel of the antichrist.

      Fact is that the Bible is anti race mixing and as you are for it, you are no neighbour of mine.

      Genesis 28:1 And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous11:11 am

      Anon 7.55
      you are misunderstanding my dialogue. I am not talking about inter-marriage. The Scriptures state that we must not be unequally yoked with a non believer. I am merely stating that Salvation is available to all who repent, accept the blood of Y'Shua, and return to the ways of Scripture. This is not based on colour or bloodline alone. Please get it now. As for being your neighbour, you focus on division therefore I would prefer not to mix with you anyway.
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    10. Anonymous1:03 pm

      Certain biblical verses, such as those racial ones quoted above, are never disseminated in churches'.

      Delete
    11. Anonymous9:47 am

      Faith Walker 7:55

      What do you not understand about this verse?

      Mat 15
      "I have only been sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel,"

      This is Jesus himself speaking.

      Delete
  15. What a disgraceful article. Nordicists and Afrocentrists descend from the same delusional branch. Stop stealing semitic peoples culture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:22 am

      Now we know you are a libtart provoking emotions. What a sick life you must lead. I pity you, your time is running low. It's going to be fun hunting your kind to extinction.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:20 am

      go be a black homo somewhere else.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:19 am

      Arabs are also semites. They are the descendants of Ismael.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:27 am

      I cam upon the truth about the biblical origin of the whites, because God showed me in a dream. I know...it's nuts right?

      It took me years of research to figure out the dream, because I initially did not understand what it meant.

      What happened was that I was standing with my arms streatched upwards and God wrote with golden letters on my palms.

      "I am Israel"

      The truth about the biblical Israelites is coming out, EXACTLY as foretold it would.

      Once you study this, then the massive mountains of evidence becomes undeniable.

      Delete
  16. https://www.facebook.com/100006383089167/videos/1746202658935820/

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous3:56 am

    Boere_Ninja

    This is so simple to answer.

    1. Where did the apostles go to preach to the lost ten tribes which Christ said?

    2. What did Josephus the biblical Jewish historian say they could be found.

    3. which black nations have accepted the word of God.

    4. Where have all those that preached the gospel come from? Look at the earliest graves around the world of the first missionaries, are they from Africa?

    5. Why did not one single black tribe even have the concept of Christ, today in most remote African countries they still dont know or have a clue.

    6. They have never been a fruitful or prosperous nation ever.

    They dont fit the bill of any of the apostles preaching the word to the lost tribes.

    The blacks as I mentioned can be traced to Canaan, I even included a link in another post - the blacks are Canaanites, and from the land of phut. There are numerous places in north Africa with the a variation of the word phut.

    Blacks fit the bill of Hams descendants - being a servant even among servants. They have never been prosperous with Arabs or Europeans.

    If it were not for Europeans Africans would still be praying to spirits. Today even among the staunchest of blacks who follow Christianity they still see sangomas.

    One has to be honest and ask, out of all the nations in the world, which nations accept Christianity as a whole, as a nation or nations.

    The conclusion will be that the white nations in Europe who spread through the world preaching the gospel fit the description 100%, the are prosperous, they have spread the word, they accept Christianity as their foundation of worship and we can see Satan in these last days is against all white Christian nations.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8qUGzEBpYE

    Here is a short but to the point historical account - one has to ask would blacks even know about the 10 tribes or about Christ if it was not for whites??



    The answer is simple, go to the remote jungles of India where you find Africans today, go to the remotest parts of the Jungles in the Congo and find out - the answer is no.


    Kaffirs are from Ham! They are black and have been treated as servants by Asians, Africans, Europeans and Arabs - not the other way around.

    When left alone they do not continue to uplift themselves they go backward like in Haiti with their voodoo.

    Kaffirs would not know anything if it were not for whites.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:50 am

      Exactly BN - your last sentence says it all. If we are 'the light' to the world, have we done a good job of showing the heathen how to follow God's ways? No we have not. In fact we have proved to be mostly hypocrites. Do you honour the Sabbath and the other Biblical feast days? do you eat clean? do we uphold the other Biblical lessons. Do the 'Boers' honour the land Sabbath? I think not. We, as the Biblical agents have failed in our mission to change others. And of course this applies to me as well before someone attacks me.
      It boils down to two categories: Those who follow the way and those who don't - irrespective of colour.
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    2. Anonymous1:17 pm

      Faith Walker, it is because whites haven't been upholding YHWH's laws, this is the reason we whites are in the very position we find ourselves in today. Cherry picking what we choose to believe and to ignore - shooting ourselves in the foot, because the laws are made for our own good.

      If you really know your bible, you would notice many places in the old and new testament, where Christ spells out in different ways, that he is Only sent for the lost sheep of the house Israel.
      A good way to start for those interested, is to obtain the King James bible and the matching Hebrew/Greek lexicon that goes with it - Strings Concordance of the Bible. Jesus means to be humbled - insulting imo.

      Yashua translates "I am Saved".

      YHWH translates "I Am that I Am

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:37 am

      Identification marks of Israel in the bible

      1) Israel was to be a powerful nation (Micah 4:7; 5:8)
      2) The people of Israel were to live in the ends, sides, and uttermost parts of the earth (Deuteronomy 33:17) - [Note how the Anglo-Saxon and kindred peoples reside all over the globe, from the Americas to Europe to South Africa to Australia to Iceland]
      3) Israel to be the chief missionary power of the earth, carrying the gospel everywhere. (Isaiah 49:6; Micah 5:7)
      4) Israel to become a nation and a company of nations. (Genesis 35:11)
      5) Israel was to be a blessing to all nations. (Genesis 22:18) [Note how the technology invented by the Western white nations has benefitted all mankind]
      6) Israel was to have a new home, other than Canaan Land. (2 Samuel 7:10; 1 Chronicles 17:9; Jeremiah 3:18; 12:15; 16:13-15; 23:3-8; 50:17; Isaiah 14:1; Ezekiel 34:13; 37:21; 39:22-29; Amos 2:15)
      7) Israel’s new land was to be inhabited by people gathered from many nations. (Ezekiel 38:8)
      8) Israel was to have a land of unwalled villages, without walls, bars or gates. (Ezekiel 38:11). [Note that this is not the case with the so-called "jews", who live in walled/gaurded towns today in Palestine]
      9) Israel was to have a land of great agricultural wealth. (Deuteronomy 28:8-11). [The top agricultural exporting nations in the world are the United States, France, Netherlands, Germany, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Italy, Belgium, and Spain, in that order]
      10) Israel was to be Yahweh's "battle axe and weapon of war" (Num. 24:8, 9; Isa. 41:15, 16; Jer. 51:20-23). [The Israelites would be used by 'God' to destroy wicked heathen nations, and would be superior in warfare. Eg, the Germanic "Goths" sacked Rome, etc]

      Delete
    4. Anonymous12:59 am

      Fatih Walker "eat clean"

      LOL

      Acts 10
      11 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending upon him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth:

      12 Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air.

      13 And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.

      A4

      Delete
    5. Anonymous3:57 am

      12.59
      read the rest of the chapter. It was a parable. Peter had to discern what was meant.
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    6. Anonymous7:52 am

      Mat

      Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.

      Delete
  18. Anonymous4:18 am

    Boere_Ninja

    Whats interesting is that the British Monarchy are from the house of David - there is ample suggestion of this, to David Ickes disbelief they are not reptiles but more like blue bloods.



    Samuel 17:42

    David Slays Goliath
    …41Then the Philistine came on and approached David, with the shield-bearer in front of him. 42When the Philistine looked and saw David, he disdained him; for he was but a youth, and ruddy, with a handsome appearance. 43The Philistine said to David, "Am I a dog, that you come to me with sticks?" And the Philistine cursed David by his gods.…

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/vaticancityandholysee/5675461/Oldest-image-of-St-Paul-discovered.html

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/jun/22/apostles-images-john-andrew-italy

    Remember these apostles were Israelite's and Jews, they mention it in all their books - Here we go, I bet this negroid is not going to be happy about this, must be a conspiracy.

    The most remarkable thing about this Israelite identity is that as a nation, the Afrikaners have always known this, without even referencing any historical records.

    Its as if they have always known which is why it is scriptural to have apartheid - they were following the bible which is why this world came down on them so heavy, this is Satan's domain.

    They opposed the dark forces but for now were defeated - Remember I mentioned what happens here is a miracle in the end and they prayed at blood river, now they are praying on campus and soon all our hearts, minds and prayers will be for redemption from this evil kaffir which is Satan's descendant.

    I feel sorry for them, they can outnumber us, they can be + have all the financing, when you go up against God & his people it never ends well.

    NEVER - a covenant was made with our people again at blood river, it is everlasting. We turned our backs but will be brought back but by our knees but when we eventually stand up, boy oh boy...

    Again if this nation actually listened what to do to with the Canaanites then we would not have this problem today, pity they did not know who the other races were.

    If they did, perhaps they would have done the inevitable. God I wish I could be president for one year in this country, there would not be one single one left and I would simply be following what the good book says.

    Remember Christ said he had not come to abolish the laws of the prophets. All these modern day Christian assholes apply the "love thy neighbor" verse and apply it to all races.

    What did Christ tell his disciples? Go but unto the lost sheep. This love your neighbor verse which is taken out of context all the time applies to the Israelite neighbors just like to good book is ONLY applicable to Israel.

    There are around 1,281 verses in the bible and then there is 2,575 mentions of Israel hmmm the people not the country, this tells us how important they are - No Israel no bible.

    Anyone can be saved but there is only one bride on Earth - Israel.

    Without Israel the new Jerusalem cannot be and hence why Satan is trying to destroy the last Christian nations on earth. No Jerusalem = revelations not fulfilled, revelations not fulfilled = God + the bible a lie, Satan has always been about deceit.

    Israel is not the land but the people! Those people were preached to and were in Europe and Asia minor which at that time was a European settlement.

    Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.

    Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,

    The black curse is that they always starve, always kill, not prosperous - this is not the work of God - only do you find this among the dark nations.






    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:57 am

      BN
      just remember the first bride (Eve) was taken out of the body of Adam.
      Likewise the second Bride of Y'Shua will be taken out of His church 'body'. The Bride (i.e. a remnant) is a group of overcomer's who rule and reign with Y'Shua. The whole body of believers will not be the Bride. The Bride is the 'first fruit' offering from the wheat harvest.
      Faith Walker

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:10 pm

      Boere_Ninja

      Sorry but the Church has nothing to do with Christ. So tomorrow if there were only Chinese left with Chinese churches then Christ would come?

      Why is it so difficult for people to understand that Christ said " I have not come BUT unto the lost sheep" and Go but not unto the lost sheep of Israel....

      The Church today, Christ would not even set one foot in it.

      The modern Church is more vile than a whore porn star - please go read the last two - three chapters of Revelations it has absolutely nothing to do with the Church and only with the tribes uniting - Israel.

      There were no churches until Christ came! But there was Israel and that covenant between Abraham, Isaac, Jacob is everlasting.

      No my friend the Church claim they are the bride, Christ claims so otherwise. This is why I dont go to Church but read my bible.

      You cant listen to anyone preach, teach or talk about the bible until you understand the difference between a Hebrew, Jew and an Israelite are.

      If one wants to start discussing the bible without these facts they might as well be talking out their ass because the ENTIRE book follows.

      Adam ---fallen angels on earth book of Enoch - ----Noah----Abraham ---- Isaac --Jacob---> Jacobs children who grew to become 12 tribes --- Israel & Judah at war ---- Israel taken into captivity, Judah taken into captivity --- Christ born sends his disciples to Israel who left Assyria and crossed the caucus mountain range into Europe --- Christ crucified ---- The word of Christ taught to the lost ten tribes who then scatter to the four corners of the earth preaching the gospel.

      Now we wait for his arrival - has nothing to do with the Church, Christ did not come but unto the house of Israel - it says so specifically.

      Please the reason the church has so many denominations is that they themselves dont know who they are or who these people were + they want to make it applicable to all the nations which is just as unscriptual.

      Then people will quote the apostles who are in contrast with Christs teachings, Christ says go but unto the house of Israel the apostles spoke differently....

      Trick question - who do you believe more

      1. Jesus
      2. The apostles?

      There is a lot that these apostles mention which is in contrast to what Christ said, Christ said I have not come to remove the law of the prophets or the law of Moses... Then what right do the apostles have to take the word, the message and say it is for the world?

      Me thinks someone was tampering with text here

      I cant see Christ coming to a Church with a gay pastor! Christ specifically said he does his fathers work, then why burn sodom for the same reason - homosexuality but then come back for the Church?

      The Church is in contrast to the bible which is why it fits their agenda to make the book into one giant story, fantasy, Lord of the rings - If you know the history, the people, who the people/are/were then read the bible then you have Xray vision and can see how out of touch the Church is.

      One cant even read revelations without knowing who or what Israel is -

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:23 pm

      Church, Kirche, Kerk or whatever, is a political institution, it is not Biblical. The Scriptures uses the word Ekklesia which is congregation. The Scriptures says clearly "where two or more gather in My Name, I will be present."

      Delete
  19. Clearly the Hebrews were white. Except for the facts you gave and many others, there is also the fact that the Israelites were a warrior people. They won some battles, they lost some battles, but they fought on the same level as the nations around them. If they were black they would have been eradicated with their holy books and all. Remember in that region and in that era there were no liberals or any form of political correctness. You were either very strong or very intelligent - none of which are features of blacks. Plus blacks never invented any form or writing, while the Israelits wrote their hearts out and we can still read of their adventures today. Not all true - I must admit - but its still in WRITTEN form. What written proof did Shaka leave behind of his adventures? Zilch.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous5:29 am

    Anonymous4:18 AM
    Boere_Ninja

    Man I would be so happy if you could be President!!

    Really, it is no joke! I mean it!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous8:18 am

      Boere_Ninja
      @Anonymous5:29 AM

      It will happen, we will have someone who will do what we vote or wish for. The nation is going to come to this conclusion in the coming months.

      None from the cape to the Equator - none, not one single parasite left.

      The only thing left will be rock art and a few skulls in museums and of course film to justify our motives along with the good book.

      Should have been done ages ago.

      Delete
  21. Hi Mike

    Here they go again , trying to swop the labels again .
    Ah but were not as naive as the kaffirs to even give this a single thought.

    Guys , laugh at their stupidity , its so pathetic.
    and we all read the WORD , we know that satans time is short and he knows it too , we were told that the hatred towards us will intensify to this extend were good is called evil and visa versa..

    Let it be a vindication seeing them clutch at straws , I'm over getting offended by their screwed-up kaffir-logic , and don't even wanto explain things to them any more .

    There's a BIG suprise waiting for these flappies , and its closer than we think.
    I'm no prophet or siener but I think we can all see were living in the prophecy .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:05 am

      It is AMAZING to see how the Israelites are waking up to their identity and it is happening at an exponential rate.

      The time is at hand.

      Arise!

      A4

      Delete
  22. It was really entertaining reading this scanning this blog :) Suffice to say that I could not disagree more with any of the psuedo science,archaeology and other misinformation that is posted here as fact without substantiation . However that being everyone needs their place in the sun even the bigots . Before I depart take some advice or not from a Cape Coloured who in accordance with your philosophy parroted his way through law school and the bar exam and tone down the hate speech since our common law is constantly being developed and in the not to distant future you will find yourself either in a criminal court or in the equality court with the concomitant consequences. I realise this will probably result in a discourse on Marxism/communism ad nauseam however I do hope that my warning is heeded so that this can remain a refuge for the like-minded since even the feeble-minded need companions . Be well (still giggling at your stupidity but admire the passion )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh God...Kyk almal...'n Slim Hotnot..

      Delete
    2. Anonymous3:23 pm

      Sleg baster.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous3:26 pm

      Oh and BTW I'm a proud racist and bigot when dealing with any non-white(I dislike and loathe a lot of whites too am I a whitest too?), I think there is enough evidence in the world to justify my judgement of your kind.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous1:09 am

      Deu
      A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

      The word bastard above is translated from the Hebrew word MAMZEr and it specifically refers to mixed race peoples.

      The bible is the most racist book on earth.
      It IS only for the Israelites.

      Delete
    5. Well since I am Jewish that is me sorted then isn't it :)

      Delete
    6. So first you are coloured then you are Jewish. What is it mate?

      Ag forget it. Anything mixed with a coloured is a coloured, right?

      Delete
    7. :) Jewish is not a color but a way of living there are even Ethiopian Jews

      Delete
  23. Giggle , definitely funny Mike :) http://www.mambaonline.com/2016/01/14/sa-hate-crimes-bill-revealed-soon/ here is a link fortunately no law is retrospective however best to start practising . The funny thing is I share your sentiments in respect of where this country is heading hence my imminent emigration however some of the theories are way out there .Sherbet does that may me an Uncle Tom ? Dammit.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So why are you emigrating if you love the blacks so much and hate the whiteys?

      I am so glad that a clever guy like you graced our website with your presence. Could you please tell us what the definition of "race" is, because to the lefties and libtards there is no such thing as "race". It is only a social construct. Then please tell us what a "racist" is.

      What 10 or 15 criteria should one fulfil in order to be branded a "racist"? Should one fulfil all ten or just seven?

      See? I am not so clever as you...Bietjie dom gekom djy wiet.

      It all seems so vague to me.

      That is why I actually welcome that "hate crimes" bill. Maybe then we can finally see what the official definition of a "racist" is. Maybe then we can see if we fulfil the criteria as "racists" or not. Maybe then we can see who the REAL racists are.

      I fully welcome that bill mate. I will be the first one to lay charges against the ANC with their racist AA and BEE laws, their quotas in sport, their quotas in university entry discriminating on racial basis.

      BTW. My experience with coloureds always showed me that they are extremely "racist". You should know that seeing that you are one.

      Just wait until a child is born in the coloured community. First thing they look at is: "Het die kind hare?" meaning does he have "ting-tongs" peppercorns or smooth hair.

      Oh and when the child is born "'n bietjie donker van kleur" then they all sympathise with the poor mother, because they get violently upset when their daughters date "darkeys", but have no problem when they date "whiteys". Oh and heaven forbid if he looks like a "Boesmannetjie" or a "Makwakkie".

      Seems like the first bunch they will have to lock up for "hate crimes" are the Cape Coloureds, all of them, don't you think?

      BTW have you ever read my article Kroes hare wil geblow wees ?

      Delete
  24. Hi Mike

    @mr. Slim hotnot , you try sound so clever with your expensive words , did they no teach you propper grammer aswell?

    Kom laat die wit baas jou gou leer , you must use parragraphs,
    it makes it easier to read and reading your words without any grammer tells me what you allready know..

    Every time you look in a mirror , there's half a kaffir looking back at you..

    ReplyDelete
  25. Morning chaps:)
    Firstly, thanks for the vitriol early in the morning Stephen its really edifying . The question you pose Mike is not an easy one to be honest but what I have found and this is my experience and certainly not based on any empirical anthropological study is that race is the definer for what amounts to a refined form of tribalism .

    I have a number of Xhosa friends who are well educated,erudite and knowledgeable right up until you start to discuss the Zulu fellow colleague then one is hit with theories and hypothesis that make the posts here look positively well researched and learned .
    The exact same could be said for coloureds as well where as you noted in the article above the distinction is between those who clearly have European antecedents and those who are direct Adam Tas progeny.
    The subtle difference ,once again in my experience is that the non racist can have love for his fellow man whilst realising they have different beliefs,aspirations and culture and chooses to not assimilate as a matter of choice .(for eg the Exclusive nature of portugese,greek and jewish communities in SA) On the other hand the racist has an ill defined ,illogical and just plain retarded hatred for others based solely on race which is both ill informed and only perpetuates the myth that the solution is hegemony.

    Am I racist ? Definitely not ! Would I ever welcome a black to marry into my family ? Absolutely not and I teach my children the same since my point of view is that plainly and simply our cultures ,beliefs and approach to life are just too divergent to ever make coexistence in close proximity possible.

    Why emigrate?
    1) Our president is corrupt,tribal,stupid and not to mention rotten to the core
    2)exposed to the criminal justice system as a defence attorney I have seen the erosion of the calibre and quality of our prosecuting staff in the last decade and not because of lack of opportunity or apartheid but because of a culture of "we don't give a fuck" which has led to the impunity of criminals and a low conviction rate.
    (3) I think my children deserve to live in a society where excellence and ability are rewarded and not ignored and where patronage and political correctness will not determine your place in life

    As to the Hate Crimes bill and who should be arrested first probably you are correct since in the coloured areas the K word has become both an adjective and a noun and used in common parlance :) The difference is they are not :
    (1)publishing it on the internet
    (2)Not white (scapegoat)
    (3)don't have the old flag on the site thereby giving the jabbering idiots of political correctness a chance to snatch on to something.
    The chances that you will catch Malema and ilk singing anything untoward after the bill passes is 0 since they know how this game is played. The reason I mentioned it was less as a scare tactic than the age old adage "forewarned is forearmed"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems like we have a lot in common ;-)

      Problem is you ARE a "racist", you just keep it under wraps and that makes it kinda OK?

      I nail my colours to the mast and am open and honest about it. With me you know where you stand. With you I don't.

      BTW, since when is the old flag "racist" and since when is it illegal? Have I missed the banning of it?

      I fly that flag, because it symbolises a time when this country was run properly. A time when there was prosperity for all. A time when the streets were clean and the police respected. A time when SA was a first world country to be proud of.

      You fly the new flag that looks like the G-string of Winnie Mandela. Unfortunately I cannot respect that flag. That flag represents the time when South Africa was destroyed by the thieving and corrupt ANC and its voters. Look around you. See the destruction of the New (improved) South Africa. Instead of joining us in our fight you want to criticize. Call us "racists".

      Let me tell you what a "racist" is in SA. Anybody who disagrees with the ANC.

      So wake up mate. Your brown colour is an eye-sore to the ANC. They already said there are too many Cape Coloureds in the Cape. By emigrating you are doing them a favour. They wish you coloureds would all emigrate.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the response . I disagree with the statement that I am racist since just as I don't regard every black man as a kraal living,cattle herding ,farmer murdering savage simply based on his race so I don't regard every white as either a simpering vegan forever trying to foist liberalism upon all and sundry or a gun toting,safari suit wearing ,brand drinking incestuous Neanderthal since those are all generalisations and cliches of the worst sort.

      That being said surely every citizen has the right nay the duty to fight for and ensure the success of their country and should be free to do so even if that means the non violent bringing down of the Government.

      What I take issue with the obligatory hate speech as part of the discourse because it does the following :
      1) alienates potential supporters who although conservative are not comfortable with the language
      2) takes away from the cogency of the important political commentary you do make because it becomes easy for the majority of non discerning readers (almost everyone ) to tar you commentary with the racist brush and thereby ignore the truth contained therein.
      3)strengthens the liberal agenda towards hegemony in terms of race , sexual orientation etc.

      As to the flag issue I am unsurprisingly a fan of the old flag but only mentioned it since by doing so its very easy to pigeon-hole someone to their detriment .

      As to what should be done about the current situation in SA I suspect the time for change by means of political means is long gone and that rather an approach should be done at the Hague for a declaration on self determination and the rights of minorities but this must be coupled with a media campaign devoid of emotive language and any sign of racism .The question is does the Afrikaner have leaders strong enough and subtle enough to do this ?If so it will be a long fight but a potentially successful one .If history has taught us anything it is that the SA government is susceptible to international pressure (SEE NENE incident)
      As to the criticising comment be assured that is not my intent and in fact quite the opposite since the unfairness that I see perpetuated in society daily in respect of the way in which those of European descent are made to feel guilty for their antecedents , achievements and rewards of hard work and ingenuity is particularly galling .

      So in conclusion most of your political commentary is on the money albeit couched in language that would drive most away .(excluding the anthropological rubbish :)

      Delete
    3. Mooi so Dio , I see your starting to use parragraphs.

      And your right , this is a save-haven , our little fortres with the oranje-banje-blou raised high. So if your man enough to post a derograty comment - don't cry when the 'exremists' attack back with words.

      And the reason I got annoid with you is that your words reminds me sooo much of the teachings that men have heaped up for themselfs , and their itchy ears and minds adhearing to doctrines of demons , rather than the truth.

      If you say you agree with our collective narative , then don't diss-agree with your highly-educated-vocabulary.

      Delete
    4. @Dio Medical.
      The problem you have is that you come on here and start generalizing that the people here all stupid and hate blacks. Your words were:

      “…the racist has an ill defined ,illogical and just plain retarded hatred for others based solely on race which is both ill informed and only perpetuates the myth that the solution is hegemony.”

      The other day Malema asked why whites despise blacks. Another generalization seeing that White libtards like Max du Preez, Gillian SChutte, Marelise van der Merwe, et al. LOOOOOVES blacks.

      I for one do not hate blacks for the colour of their skin at all. That would just be silly, seeing that they cannot help for what they are. In fact the only people I truly hate are WHITE. White liberals and leftists. See…maybe racists hate other racists. I don’t know. But what I do know is that white Libtards are the worst “racists” seeing that they hate their own race.

      This is what I wrote the other day.

      So let us assume that some whites do despise some blacks and let me then try to answer Malema about WHY, seeing that he asked.

      Maybe it is because of their abominable practices under the excuse of “It’s my kultcha”, that is the cause. Practices such as Lobola (buying multiple wives with cows) or uKuthwala (old men raping young girls to make them their wives) or Ulwaluko (circumcision of boys with dirty blunt knives causing gangrene and their penises to rot off) or Ukweshwama (a bull being tortured and killed with bare hands by boys to prove they are men) or maybe it is Muti killings (human organs, genitals, fingers, tongues cut out of living children and sold for medicine) that causes the despising.

      Maybe it is superstitious beliefs like the Tokoloshe or forefather worship animism

      Or maybe it is simply the way they react at a party (especially when there is a buffet) or on the beach.

      Or maybe it is just their utter slowness, lazyness and incompetence observed daily at work and especially at government institutions such as the Department of Home Affairs.

      Maybe it is just the observations you make when you stand behind a black at an ATM or in the queue at a Pick & Pay.

      Maybe it is like Malema says…because they prefer to live like rats amongst their own garbage and filth that one notices when driving past a township. It could even be that they smell funny.

      Maybe it is their violent nature or their entitlement culture, their victim mentality and always blaming whites for their failures. Maybe it is their corrupt and thieving nature and their propensity to destroy and ruin everything including a once prosperous first world country.

      There are many reasons, all rectifiable, but whatever the reasons are that whites despise blacks…You will notice that not once did I mention it is because of the colour of their skin.

      Delete
    5. @Dio Medical.
      Further, maybe you don’t like this website. Maybe you think it is full of “obligatory hatespeech”.
      Define “hatespeech” and maybe I can tell you if it is true or not.
      Tell me something, mate…Where else should we or can we openly talk about the racial and the political problems South Africans face? Politics in SA has always and will always be racial. Whites vote for whites and blacks vote for blacks. It is just the way it is.
      The main stream media like IOL, News24, Daily Maverick…all shut their comments sections down. The ANC wants to bring out “hatespeech” laws. Do you think SA’s racial problems are going to go away if we simply sweep it under the carpet and pretend it doesn’t exist? Or should we have a free and open debate about it?
      You are wrong mate. This website does not alienate people. It draws them like flies. I clock between 3000 and 9000 clicks per day and it grows daily. People from all races and from all over the world come here to comment.
      The people who want to tar me with the “racist” brush and ignore what I write are free to do so. If they don’t like what I write they are welcome to bugger off and go to the Sowetan. They will find a hell of a lot more “hatespeech” there. Anti-white “hatespeech” that is.
      Tell you what. Why don’t I close this website down then we can test if it will help to bring crime and farm murders down. Let us see if the ANC will steal less and start governing properly. Somehow I don’t think so.
      Actually I wanted to close this website many times, because I am convinced it is better for the ANC that this website exists. It is a relief valve for most whites and a white “Stimmungsbarometer” for the ANC. If these whites stop commenting here and are forced to go underground like the old Broederbond, the ANC will be in big trouble.

      BTW, I feel that the Western Cape should be independent. Everything south of the Orange and west of the Fish rivers is ours. Blacks have no historical claim to any of it.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous6:34 am

      Mike you do say it as it is, even if it hurts, pull no punches, call a spade a spade.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous1:26 pm

      Mike: "That would just be silly, seeing that they cannot help for what they are."

      ... for what they are ... no, that's not English.

      "They cannot help BEING what they are."

      Better?

      For what it's worth.

      Delete
    8. @ Anonymous 1:26 PM.

      Thanks for the correction. English is my third language ;-)

      Delete
  26. Anonymous12:43 am

    What was Cain's curse?

    Gen 4:12
    When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you.

    This basically means POVERTY.

    Cain's descendants will be poor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmmm don't quite follow the reasoning here anon if you could elucidate that would help thanks

      Delete
    2. Anon I suspect I just got your nuanced reference if its accepted that the darker races are the descendants of Cain then both spiritual and material poverty are their just desserts right ?

      Better not tell Zuma and co that though since we can not exactly criticise their laziness ,lack of ambition and ingenuity if its pre-ordained can we ?

      Following your reasoning G-d made them like that so obviously there is an absence of free will ...poor innocents:)

      Delete
  27. Thanks for the response Mike I can do no better to define Hate speech than to quote Section 10 of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 hereinafter referred to as PEPUD namely;

    "Subject to the proviso in section 12, no person may publish, propagate, advocate or communicate words based on one or more of the prohibited grounds, against any person, that could reasonably be construed to demonstrate a clear intention to-
    a) be hurtful;
    b) be harmful or to incite harm;
    c) promote or propagate hatred."

    The definitions clause of the Act refers to race as being one of the prohibited grounds and in Nomasomi Gloria Kente v Andre van Deventer (EqC) (unreported case no EC 9/13, 24-10-2014 a domestic worker was awarded R50 000 damages for the use of the K word amongst others.

    So to be honest the term hate speech is both readily definable and ascertainable and once that is done the consequences are relatively simple . It seems that my posting is misinterpreted I might not agree with every statement on this site but would defend to the death your right to criticise and belittle the shortcomings of Government so that's not the issue.

    Also bear in mind that the number of visits you have per juxtaposed against the minuscule percentage of posters that I have seen begs the question "could the use of offensive and now clearly hate speech not be the reason why so few post although they share your dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs ?"

    From my reading of this site and your articles/commentary it is clear that you are both well read and well informed and have a unique yet insightful take on current events however by being careless with the hate speech this site will only remain a bastion for the dark mutterings of the few when it has the potential for so much more .

    It might sound strange coming from a coloured oke who has no investment in this but ultimately my own people are notorious "draadsitters" so the chance of them ever doing anything other than look after number 1 is non existent whereas I see alot of good here . Anything I say is merely an observation and certainly not prescriptive being at best food for thought and further debate.

    Stephen,

    Ja Oubaas die hotnotjie luister mos as die oubaas praat en het onmiddelik paragrawe gebruik eerder as om die oubaas teleurtestel met my ongeletterede gedrag .

    Enige iets wat ek vir die oubaas moet doen vra net oubaas :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:32 am

      Dio Medical thank you for your legal input here, although quite a bit of it has surfaced on social media already (and the consequences of the new law), together with this new BlackList law cANCer is busy employing; which, if I interpret correctly, will give MarmiteMannetjie Zuma (see, no K word?) and his mafia government full control over who can be called racist, and who not. Further, it is my full understanding that this new "law" will only benefit some. As it was put out there that only white people can be racist by enforcing the preservation of their own language, whilst "others" openly propagate "fuck white people", "kill the boer, kill the farmer" (thats death speech, not hate speech btw) are brushed off as a mere 'expression of opinion'. Naah my friend, I toss my willy at this, because it's one sided. The time for the White Afrikaner to go underground and prepare for a bloody battle is near. Time for peaceful and meaningful negotiations and communications are long gone. I agree with them on their 'land grabbing' crusades. But the borderline will be the Orange River and the Fish River. No black man can make any claims beyond that. Then they will be left to their own devices. They got what they were fighting for. Then re-establishing with the indigenous South Western people will begin. As for as my knowledge goes, 100% of Cape Colourds are Afrikaans speaking. Shit is about to get real.

      Delete
  28. My apologies just one aspect I forgot to traverse. The quotation in respect of racists above was used defining the difference between a racist and a non racist and not directed at anyone here .

    If I believed you were a non thinking racist it would be futile discussing anything racists see no logic and common sense does not work with them (See Malema)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dio , exactly , if we can pit this much thought and words into explaing ourselfs , then surely collectively we can Do something with this potential you see.

      When I use the k-word its in refrence to someone that is totally the opposite of ' our normal '. No regard for morals -no regard for life,blaspheming godless ...you know the list ect.ect.

      Now turns out that more than 94% of our population fits this bill perfecly , no wonder people like me vent with a word or two...

      My apoligies for the reflex comments.

      Delete
    2. No worries Stephen I have done and said worse :)

      Delete
  29. @Dio Medical.

    Thanks for reference to that bullshit law.

    I am not a lawyer like you, but surely you must agree that not every law that is official is just and therefore it must be the duty of good men to break unjust laws instituted by thieving and corrupt regimes.

    You cannot measure with two different rods here. If Mandela is seen as a hero for breaking Apartheid laws then surely I should be seen as a hero for breaking the laws of the ANC that infringe on my individual and constitutional rights.

    And let me remind you that those men who wrote all those Apartheid laws and ruled South Africa were all lawyers like you. Malan, Strijdom, Verwoerd, Vorster even F.W. de Klerk….All lawyers.

    See, I don’t care much for all these bullshit Kaffir laws and what their lawyers and advocates say. I found out a long time ago that lawyers who write laws always leave a back door open so they can use in the future to break that exact same law. At the end of the day it all comes down to subjective bullshit interpretation of words. Semantic juggling.

    Take your bullshit law number so and so above. “Hurtful”, “harmful”…all relative bollocks mate. What is hurtful to you might not be hurtful to me. Same with harmful. How do you measure it? What criteria do you use? Which criteria do I need to fulfil in my speech for you to class it as hateful to whom?

    Please mate, you are the lawyer being always fair. Tell us.
    See…For instance, most people believe this junk that the Native Land Act of 1913 was unjust and deprived blacks of their land. Until I went and read the law myself. Who does the land belong to?

    Nowhere does it refer to blacks or whites and when I checked the deeds records I found out that the people who benefitted the most were the blacks and they actually praised the law back then.

    It refers to “Natives” and “People other than natives”. Race is not mentioned at all. So you tell me who is a “Native” of south Africa? Seeing that Afrikaans is spoken nowhere else in the world except South Africa, and originated here, I would say it is indeed “Native” and seeing that there is no other Afrikaans mother country in the world, the Afrikaner Volk is native. It originated on this land.

    At the end of the day you quote some previous case as if that is something to go by. It is conformity to the mean. It is intellectual communism. It is an acknowledgement of the judge’s inferiority to make a decision. It is all emotional wiff-waff. “They said so, and he said so and in 1993 when a similar case was up they all agreed so we should say so”. Fucking subjective conformist bullshit mate. Nothing to do with JUSTICE at all. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Coming back to your bullshit law of “hatespeech”.

      Besides, when somebody is offended by me using a certain word, such as “Kaffir” or “Hotnot”, they immediately show that they ARE indeed inferior. To a superior person it would be water off a duck’s back. Ever seen white people get offended by being called “Umlungu”, meaning “white scum from the sea”? Didn’t think so.

      Now this is where it comes down to…Like I said, my individual and constitutional rights., because that is the only job of this government.

      Their job is not to build schools or tar roads. They have ONE FUCKING JOB. And that is to protect my individual rights as pointed out to them in the constitution.

      See mate…You are the clever lawyer and I am the stupid racist, right? You think that the ANC government writes the constitution and tell us what our rights are. FUCK OFF!!

      WE give the government a constitution. WE tell THEM what our individual rights are. Their only job is to protect those rights. Nothing else. Not the rights of the majority as our idiot president believe, not the rights of the ruling party.

      Governments only job is to protect your and mine individual rights to freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom to own property, freedom of movement, etc.

      If they step out of their mandate to protect our individual rights and start protecting the rights of the majority we have tyranny…Then WE have to, are obliged to, hold them to account.

      So tell you what mate…Fuck the ANC. Fuck their unjust “majority rules” laws. Let them come after me. Let us see how far they get.

      The day they start respecting my individual rights is the day I will start respecting them. Until then, they can count on my full resistance by any and all means.

      Here is my pledge. As long as my arsehole points downwards, I will fight them. I will not go quietly into the night…I will fight the dying of the light.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous1:45 pm

      Well said Mike.

      Delete
  30. Thanks Mike for the response a number of errors though that I will endeavour to correct . Section 1.1 (a)(b) makes it clear that there is a distinction between natives and non natives since it prohibits sales of land between natives and non natives thereby ensuring something as elementary as freedom of commerce was restricted .

    The implementation of the Act made it clear that our Courts as they then were understood the Act to apply to Blacks so that's not in dispute at all in fact the contrary.

    The quoting of a previous decision is not intellectual communism far from it but rather a mainstay of all legal systems both codified (France and Germany et al) and Common Law(USA ,UK et al) based on the Stare Precisis principle which ensures uniformity and certainty .

    The tension you speak of with regards to the Constitution is germane to all constitutions namely the balance to be kept between individual rights and 1st and 2nd generation communal rights . This balance is very hard to keep and our Constitution is without doubt the most progressive out there in that regard from a jurisprudential point of view.
    The fact is though that wishful thinking and anger will not change the legal regime in which you find yourself and ultimately that Act is Law until the Constitutional Court rules otherwise or Parliament repeals it whichever happens first.
    Obviously justice and the validity of the Laws are two totally different concepts and a law can be both valid and unjust but thats why Courts are there to precisely make that adjudication .

    The likelihood of that particular act being declared unconstitutional is obviously 0 given the provisions of Section 39 (2)_ of the Constitution as amended.

    That being said I wish you well in breaching the prescripts of those provisions as a protest against the perceived unjust legislation since at the end of it all it might just be the type of protest that will inspire others to follow suit and if not its a valid form of protest.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You say: “The quoting of a previous decision is not intellectual communism far from it but rather a mainstay of all legal systems both codified (France and Germany et al) and Common Law(USA ,UK et al) based on the Stare Precisis principle which ensures uniformity and certainty .”
      So if they all do it then we must do it. If they all say jump in the fire then jumping in the fire must be good. Conformist subjective bollocks. I rest my case.
      Who wrote that Land act of 1913? Correct me if I am wrong, but seeing that we were a British colony back then, this law had to pass through British parliament. Why did the judges and parliamentarians back then think that it was a good law.
      Back then foreign whites and Indians were buying black land for next to nothing. This act tried to stop it and protect black land, not to take it away.

      The 1913 land act was brought in by Minister J.W. Sauer, a Cape Liberal and Minister of Native Affairs who opposed disenfranchisement of blacks and was widely considered a friend of the Blacks.

      John Tengo Jabavu, a prominent "educated African" and editor since 1876 of the first Xhosa newspaper Isigidimi Sama Xosa ("The Xhosa Messenger") welcomed the Act.
      So why did the act get such a bad name?
      Because of the bullshit stories and anecdotes written by Sol Plaatje
      The 1913 land act resulted in Blacks increasing their land ownership by 65%, Why? Because of the clause that said the Governor General could approve the sale of land to blacks and vice versa. In effect what happened is that blacks could congregate into a group and call themselves a tribe, appoint a “headman” and thus buy white land on a “willing buyer willing seller basis”.
      Read part 32 of Pandora’s Box. Read the study by Feinberg and Horn. Read the article by Dlamini in Business Day.
      Quoting from Dlamini’s article…

      “Between 1913 and 1936, for example, Africans bought about 3200 farms and lots outside of native areas. What’s more, the 1913 act was not retroactive, meaning that Africans who already owned land outside of the native reserves could not have it taken away from them. Feinberg and Horn say that between 1913 and 1924, under the governments of Louis Botha and Jan Smuts, there were 302 exemptions granted, amounting to 35% of the total. Between 1924 and 1936, when JB Hertzog was in power, there were 565 exemptions granted, amounting to 65% of the total. “

      Delete
    2. I agree that in a perfect world conformism would have no place but we do all conform daily to greater or lesser degrees .

      A very simple example would be that most people would probably agree that paedophiles should be castrated in public with a preferably rusty spoon ,however society dictates that we are more civilised than that so we choose the lesser evil and provide him with :
      1)legal counsel at state expense
      2) Housing and food in prison
      3)access to library and free university education whilst incarcerated etc

      So we conform to the mores of the society within which we live if we don't we are free to leave.
      Not exactly fair is it ?

      I read an interesting article that quoted Zuma (according to hansard )in respect of the rights of minority unions where our illustrious and not to mention highly intelligent leader had the following to say and I quote"You can’t have a union of half a thousand people because you have declared it as the union then expect to have the same rights. Sorry, we have more rights here because we are a majority. You have fewer rights because you are a minority. Absolutely, that’s how democracy works. So, it is a question of accepting the rules within democracy and you must operate in them.”

      The total misunderstanding of how rights work,their divisibility and weight is so fundamental that it beggars belief that he firstly held this position and that secondly his legal advisers who prepared his answer to this written question by the opposition was so inept that they advised him manifestly incorrectly about an aspect any first year should easily answer.

      Now imagine how he applies his mind(am being generous here) when alone and outside the glare of the media .I shudder at the thought

      Delete
    3. "So we conform to the mores of the society within which we live if we don't we are free to leave."
      No you cannot freely leave, as:
      Just where would you go?
      It's helluva expensive to leave. So if I can't afford it financially I can't freely leave.
      My ancestors got here centuries ago. Why should I leave? Why must I submit to some bullshit mores no one believes in except some lawyers and bleeding hearts? You type big words to sound all learned, but in plain Afrikaans... jy praat kak.

      Delete
    4. Hmmm that's why I said it's not fair Herlizna.Certainly wasn't proposing it but keeping quiet about it does not change the reality any more than tiddling in the wind will. As to the vocabulary be assured it's not an attempt to sound learned ,some of the dumbest people I know have a phd,just my way of communicating .

      Delete
  31. Sorry forgot to mention .Hurtful and harmful like with all legislation would impose an objective criterion which would comprise the "reasonable man test"the so called diligens paterfamilias .neither easily offended ,nor stoic etc .Our case law has a myriad of precedents on that so not really an issue but easy to determine

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Arthur O. You refer to "Reasonable man test"

      Define "reasonable".

      What is reasonable to you might not be reasonable to me. The fundamental liberal premise is that we are all the same so all people can be reasoned to. I disagree with that. I find leftist quite unreasonable and intolerant to anything other than their ideas.

      So who is this "Reasonable man" you refer to that the court bases its judgement on? See? At the end of the day we are back to subjective conformist bullshit.

      Delete
    2. Morning Mike ,
      The reasonable man test is as old as law itself to be honest and comes from Roman law .Its an average man with average beliefs etc . That unfortunately is the only test

      Delete
    3. So the average man is the conformist. Back to square one.

      Delete
  32. Oh yes sorry before I forget it is important to oppose bad regimes but is the law bad if so why ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Any law that discriminates against a minority on the basis of race. The smallest minority is the individual. Any law that undermines the individual's right to free speech, own property, etc.

      Since the ANC came to power they are constantly and actively undermining those rights with their AA and BEE laws, their media tribunal, restriction of information , expropriation laws, etc. They are constantly interfering with the judiciary. It is as if they have declared war on the people of SA and their constitutional rights. Therefore the ANC has to go.

      Delete
    2. What do you think of this? Treasury: Another coup attempt

      See? It never stops. The ANC has always and will always be at war with South Africans.

      Delete
  33. Anonymous2:18 am

    You're correct Mike. Why should we conform to any Man Made laws, such as the taking away of our freedom of speech? Which we see being attacked world wide, through the tool of political correctness.

    Why should we conform to evil laws written by governments and churches that we don't agree with?

    The only laws imo. to be respected are our Father Yahweh's laws, which are wise, fair and just.
    These I do my best to obey.

    Whole communities were most cruelly murdered en masse by the satanic catholic church in the past. Murdered for their obedience to Yahweh's, instead of manmade laws. It still happens today, albeit covertly. There truly is nothing new under the sun, and history, like nature, always repeats itself under the same conditions.

    For those "Liberal" communists' corrupting our children's minds - remember Christ's words: "but whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea." (Liberal lying hurts and corrupts little children).


    Many man made laws are just conformist rubbish to lock us into slavery, to rob us of freedom of thought, actions and of course our money.

    Btb. I believe the communist satanic theory of evolution is highly insulting to our Father Yahweh, as Yahweh says we were "made in His Image".

    We know why some wish to remove freedom of speech, and thereby attempt to silence our Father's Word. In Revelations Christ say He is the Word, and "His tongue is a two edged sword". Cutting through and exposing all dogma and lies, aka. the rubbish, deceitful, evil so called "liberalism" of today, and its "laws" and it's various affiliated horrible congregations of different types.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The truly scary part of it which Zuma cannot fathom is that whilst the secretary general of the ANC says its destabilization Zuma says it isn't :) I mean WTF don't they belong to the same party ? Does he not serve at the pleasure of Luthuli house ? Idiot cannot see the wood for the trees because his eyes are focused on the money .....dumbass.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Have to agree with the sentiment that the ANC has to go they rotten to the core ,however and this is the problem what is the alternative ? The DA that is a paragon of liberalism and all the bad that comes with it ?

    Just give us a party that is :
    i) conservative
    ii) fiscally prudent
    iii) strong on defence and strong on crime
    iv) reduce cabinet by half
    V) return to the old provincial model
    and we will be well on our way to being the powerhouse of Africa once again

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is the alternative? An independent Cape would be a good start.

      Delete
  36. Hi Mike

    Arthur do you see what Mike is saying ? .
    The same thing I'm saying , but he explains it better.

    Arthur the the law breeds condemnation , its called LOGOS
    On the other hand RHEMA which is the living word breeds live.

    so in essance our RHEMA which is a living relationship we have with the WORD,sets us free from the LOGOS that you have studied so diligently.

    It will always seem as if Mike or me are rebelious toward this logos , because we've seen how following man leads to evrything that's abominal to God.

    that's why we so loudly appose this corrupt democracy ,
    that's why Mike asks to explain reasonable , because my reasonable is not a flappies reasonable , deffinitly not.

    You see we're in tune with the spirit , and the laws were written in our hearts not by human hands.the more people try and diss-prove what God has written in our hearts , the easier it is to decern

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which "reasonable man"? White or black? I won't call the average black man reasonable seeing that 90% voted for the ANC in the last election. They must have rocks for brains. And the average white man? They all voted for the DA. It is like a toss-up between pisspot and kakpot. The average man is an idiot. The average man thinks Mandela is a Saint. And they want to measure and judge me on that?

      Delete
    2. Hi Stephen ,
      Thanks for the response yes I am familiar with the idea of universal law /natural law .That which all sentient beings know without being told . John Locke and Jeremy bentham spend forever discussing and studying it (actually the beginning of liberalism and inalienable individual rights but nou ja)
      Mike,
      Obviously any reasonable man test would use the average man ,of average intellect etc etc etc .
      It is what it is :)

      Delete
  37. Be careful with Nordicism. It's as pervasive as Afrocentrism. Obviously, Caucasians come in many forms and types, but I would take the Arthur Kemp version with a grain of salt.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Anonymous9:12 pm

    White people are so delusional LOLOL...Historically speaking the Roman's thought the Israelites/Judeans descended from "Ethiopians" according to one of their best historians from the 1st century named "Publius Cornelius Tacitus", his quote says...

    “Many assure us that the Jews (Judaeans) are descended from those "Ethiopians" who were driven by fear and hatred to emigrate from their home country when Cepheus was king.” - Publius Cornelius Tacitus ,Born: 56 AD Died: 117 AD

    Yeah they were BLACK, get mad...no one care, it still doesn't change the fact that God chose a black nation to be his people, so its best you get over it. Anyway how can a people who colonized the world(Europeans), who created superpowers and created great suffering worldwide be Israelites? Ya'll are GENTILES(Japhethites) and the reason you rule now is because THIS IS THE "TIME OF THE GENTILES". The bible says the Gentiles will realize they've inherited lies in the end (Jeremiah 16:19), not surprising...given all of the whitewashing that took place historically by whites. The bible is also very clear that in the latter days the Israelites are oppressed in every nation they're scattered to...white's have never been "scattered" to the 4 corners of the Earth and they're not "oppressed"...nice lies though...smh Read "Joel 3" on whats going to happen to your nation...

    ReplyDelete