18 January 2016
Further evidence that race is biological and NOT a social construct
By Mike Smith
18th of January 2016
One of my pet hates is hearing a deluded liberal twat utter the phrase ”Race is a social concept; not a scientific one”
I cringe every time I hear that. Electric shocks travel from my arsehole to my brain and back when I have to listen to bollocks like “there is only one human race and we are all brothers and sisters”.
Problem is, no amount of evidence can convince these liberal idiots, because they have a cognitive bias. Their minds are made up already. They only believe what they want to believe, ignore all evidence to the contrary and vilify anybody who believes differently to them, equating such people as flat-earthers, narrow-minded, etc.
They are so stupid that their own intolerance to other ideas makes THEM the narrow-minded hypocrites they are, but they cannot see it.
Basis for their belief is that the DNA of two humans chosen at random generally varies by less than 0.1 percent so can be ignored. This is less genetic variation than other types of hominids (such as chimpanzees and orangutans), leading some scientists to describe all humans as belong to the same race — the human race.
In other words we are all the same at birth. If there are differences between ethnic behaviour or achievement, then it must be the social environment they grew up in and surrounds them.
This is flawed, because people create their environment not the other way around. This 0.1% difference is the difference between civilised Europe and uncivilised Africa. How can anybody simply ignore it?
The DNA of dogs and wolves differ even less than that of humans and they can also interbreed, but nobody will argue that they are the same breed (race) or even the same species. There are marked differences in behaviour, none of it due to environment. For instance dogs are human friendly and wolves are human shy and will avoid eye contact with humans. This is even the same for wolves bred in captivity and used to humans. Wolves are also virtually un-trainable.
Of course this nurture theory is rubbish in humans as The Bell Curve for instance shows. The 25 years of research the authors put into the book is either ignored or rubbished by the liberal Social Science fraternity…who isn’t even real scientists, yet always seem to know better.
Same with books like IQ and the wealth of nations and A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History by Nicholas Wade, which appeared in 2014, that proves that race is indeed biological. It is backed up by the Human Genome Project.
However, Wade’s book is criticized by liberal reviewers, who state that “Wade goes beyond scientific consensus”. In other words, “Who is Wade to dare to think differently and come up with another theory than the establishment?”
If the consensus is that "Race does not exist" it does not exist. Argument closed.
You are not allowed to think out of the box or have a different idea than the consensus even if you are right and the consensus is wrong. Political Correctness is Intellectual Communism.
I kid you not. Sounds like the Inquisition who tried Galileo for saying the earth was not the centre of the solar system, the sun was. The earth is just another planet revolving around the sun. He was almost burned at the stake for proving something different to the consensus.
Any physical anthropologist can point out at a mere glance the biological difference between a white and a black person’s skeleton. Sickle Cell disease are only found in people with black genes. The heart pill BiDill only works in black people and has no effect whatsoever on whites. In September last year it has been discovered that White and black people have distinctive differences in fingerprints
Yet, try to get it in the thick skulls of race denying liberals that there are different species of humans…Good luck with that.