29 July 2011

Thomas Malthus vindicated: South Africa's population has passed the 50 million mark, Part Two





By Mike Smith
30th of July 2011

It is important to know that Plato took no credit or claimed originality for his ideas. He gave the credit to his teacher Socrates and to Pythagoras. Plato was under Socrates’s teaching for about 20 years.

In turn Plato at the age of 60 was the teacher of Aristotle then 20. When Aristotle was about 40 he became the personal teacher of Alexander then about 13 years old.

It was these ideas filtering through from Pythagoras and Socrates to Plato to Aristotle that ended up inspiring Alexander to conquer Persia and establish his empire. He became known as Alexander the Great and insisted that he be worshipped as a God. His was one of the first attempts to establish a one world government.

After he conquered Persia, Alexander gave Aristotle a huge sum of money with which he established a library of his own.

Since Alexander there were various other attempts to establish a one world empire. The Roman Empire and the later Germanic Holy Roman Empire were examples, but the closest we have ever seen to a One World Empire was the British Empire.

The British Empire basically went into decline shortly after the Anglo Boer War. Cecil John Rhodes came to South Africa with big dreams of establishing a British Africa from the Cape to Cairo and he wanted all the riches for the British Crown. With those riches he wanted to conquer and establish the World Wide British Empire. Unfortunately his plans were horribly sunk by a small tenacit little nation called the Boers. A crime they would never be forgiven for.

Up until the Boer War the establishment of empires always went along the lines of military conquest. But then the Fabian Society Socialists under influence of the Frankfurt School adopted a new strategy. One of gradual encroachment or as they call it “The doctrine of the inevitability of gradualism”.

This system is still being employed today and it is what drives the world gradually into a one world Socialist government.

But why Socialism? Why not another form of government? Because nothing keeps population in check better than Socialism.

These ideas of Socialism or Communism comes from Plato and one of the people who read his work was Sir Thomas More who published a book in 1516 in Latin called Utopia. He is the one credited for coining the word.

Utopia was a big island somewhere in the New World it had about 54 towns with each about 6000 people. There was no private property. Farming was the main job and all able bodied people including women had to work, but only six hours a day. Women did the same jobs as men. Food was consumed in communal halls. To move around on the Island the people had to carry passports. There were different religions and everyone was tolerant of each other. Criminals were enslaved. There were no lawyers. Laws were kept simple. There were free hospitals and it was a welfare state. Euthanasia was allowed by the state. Everyone had to wear the same simple clothes. There were no dressmakers who could make fancy apparel.

Today we look at the communist Mao Tse Tung who introduced the unisex Mao suit for men and women in two colors, black and blue and we wonder where he got the idea from. Typical useless communists can never come up with one original idea. Marx and Mao stole everything from other authors and philosophers.

Nevertheless, in the late 18th century William Godwin (father of Mary Shelley who wrote Frankenstein) and the Marquis de Condorcet were musing about the perfectibility of society. De Condorcet was a liberal who advocated equality to all men and women and all races.

It was in response to these two that Thomas Malthus wrote his essay.

Between 1798 and 1826 Thomas Malthus, an Anglican Reverend published six editions of his work An Essay on the Principle of Population in which he states that population if unchecked increases in a geometric ratio. Subsistence only increases in an arithmetic ratio.

Malthus predicted that the world would be out of food by 1890. Well, that did not occur, basically because Malthus forgot that technology advances. That scientists and engineers would find ways to produce more food.

Nevertheless Malthus made some nice recommendations in Chapter five where he attacked the “Poor Laws”.

He basically said that a welfare state creates overpopulation. Malthus being a religious man did not encourage birth control…no strangely enough he rather proposed the devious culling of the poor by forcing them closer together and making conditions conducive for diseases of all sorts.

Somehow in his mind this was a more acceptable method of keeping population down than birth control.

Here is what he recommended we do to the poor.

“Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases: and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders.”
Now does that not sound exactly what the black townships of South Africa looks like?

Then along came Lord Bertrand Russell a member of the Socialist Fabian Society and said that population explosion should be brought in check before a world government can be introduced.

There are two types of liberals or leftists. There are the sheep who really believe the crap theories of multiculturalism, holding hands with all races and religions and singing Kumbaya with the blacks…

Then there are the ones who pretend to be liberals, but in their hearts and minds they are the biggest racists. They are the enlightened liberals. They keep it a secret. They worry about the disappearance of the whites and believe that the other races should be culled, but they do it in such a devious way that it appears all liberal and acceptable.

Bertrand Russell was one of these enlightened Liberals. He died in 1970 at the age of 97. He saw the Anglo Boer War as well as two World Wars. He was also a friend of Jan Smuts, South African Prime Minister, and the man who basically singlehandedly drew up the constitution of the United Nations.

Bertrand Russell believed that the white population of the world would soon stop to increase and that they would therefore “have to defend themselves by methods which are disgusting even if they are necessary”.
Here are his quotes…

“The white population of the world will soon cease to increase. The Asiatic races will be longer, and the negroes still longer, before their birth rate falls sufficiently to make their numbers stable without help of war and pestilence. Until that happens, the benefits aimed at by socialism can only be partially realized, and the less prolific races will have to defend themselves by methods which are disgusting even if they are necessary.” –Bertrand Russell

“I have already spoken of the population problem, but a few words must be added about its political aspect. …. It will be impossible to feel that the world is in a satisfactory state until there is a certain degree of equality, and a certain acquiescence everywhere in the power of the World Government, and this will not be possible until the poorer nations of the world have become … more or less stationary in population. The conclusion to which we are driven by the facts that we have been considering is that, while great wars cannot be avoided until there is a World Government, a World Government cannot be stable until every important country has nearly stationary population.” –Bertrand Russell
You see? This is what the agenda was when Jan Smuts was Prime Minister of South Africa.

They were all working towards a One World Government and controlling the population of the Third World.

Smuts knew the agenda. He saw things holistically. I mean it is not rocket science. In1900 when he was a Boer War General the population of whites in South Africa was about 2 million. The Black population was about the same.

At the end of WWII the black population stood at 20 million. And the white population about 3 million.

Smuts wanted to introduce a liberal government in South Africa and through these liberal Malthusian policies cull the black population and increase the white population through immigration from Europe.

Unfortunately in 1948, before he could get his plans off the ground, the National Party took over. They saw his policies of white immigration as threatening to the Afrikaner culture, because if all these people came to SA, they would have to speak English to communicate, so Afrikaans would disappear.

Experience have shown, even with the Boers emigrating to Argentina, that the contrary is true. Those Europeans would have been Afrikaners within two generations.

To control population is actually quite simple and there are only two options. Either birthrates must come down or death rates must go up.

Robbert Macnamara the former Chief of the World Bank and the man who ran the Vietnam War summed it up…

“…There are only two possible ways in which a world of 10 billion people can be averted. Either the current birth rates must come down more quickly. Or the current death rates must go up. “There is no other way. “There are, of course, many ways in which the death rates can go up. In a thermonuclear age, war can accomplish it very quickly and decisively. Famine and disease are nature’s ancient checks on population growth, and neither one has disappeared from the scene…. “To put it simply: Excessive population growth is the greatest single obstacle to the economic and social advancement of most of the societies in the developing world.” –Robert McNamara, Oct. 2, 1979

In South Africa the National Party came to power in 1948 not understanding the global game.

At first the Fabian Socialists and the World powers let them be. They hoped that the Afrikaner Nationalists would become like the Nazis and decimate the blacks, obviously solving the population problem.

Instead the Afrikaners built hospitals for the blacks, cured their diseases, raised their life expectancy by 30 years, the same as white’s. The Nationalists built schools for them, gave them their own countries and assisted them to run it…the result was that by 1980 the black population exploded and stood at 35 million. A disaster for the one worlders.

When the white South Africans did not want to decimate the blacks the blacks were agitated and set loose on the whites, hoping it would trigger a civil war and that the whites would that way cull the blacks, but the whites easily put down these revolts and carried on building houses and hospitals for the blacks. By 1990 their numbers were 40 million and that of the whites 4 million.

Not only that. The good, Christian white farmers of South Africa were feeding the entire population, black and white, and exporting their products not only to Europe but to the rest of Africa. An obvious disaster for the Platoists and one worlders.

That is why the system of Apartheid simply had to go. Apartheid was too good to the blacks. Their numbers exploded, the blacks from the neighboring socialist states flocked to South Africa. State of the art electrified fences could not keep them out. On the Mozambique border with the Kruger National Park they were facing lions and hyenas to get INTO South Africa.

That is why the Socialists had Apartheid in the UN declared as “A crime against humanity”…not because of how bad it was to blacks, but because of how good it was.

Today we have the ANC black socialists in power. For their efforts they are richly rewarded, because they are playing the game. Under their policies, white farmers are disappearing. Food production is decreasing. The Malthusian catastrophe is being forcefully introduced in South Africa.

Africa is once against starving as we see in the Horn of Africa. South Africa has for the first time in its history started to import food. Clean water is becoming scarce in South Africa. Food is more expensive than in Europe. Hospitals are run down. The education system is dumbed down. 500 thousand blacks die each year from AIDS. Black on white crime has increased exponentially. Whites are being impoverished. Black hate-speech against whites is increasing…

It does not take much intellect to start realizing what the message is from the powers that be.

“Stop feeding blacks. Stop employing them. Start hating them. Make war against them…”

It is only a matter of time before the Malthusian catastrophe hits South Africa. Food production is decreasing and the black population is exploding. 15 million Blacks are on welfare and social grants paid for by 4 million whites.

Today we should be glad that the population is only 50 million. If the Apartheid government was still in control it would probably have been 80 million.

Nevertheless, 50 million is still shocking. The population is still growing. This, according to the Malthusians, cannot continue. If birth control is not working then the negative controllers should be implemented…famine, war and killer diseases.

And that, dear people, is on the cards for the future South Africa. The blacks keep killing the whites, keep driving them away, but all they are doing is playing into the hands of the International Socialists which will lead to their own destruction. That will be their reward for supporting the diabolical Socialists.

That is why socialism is the best thing for Africa since mieliepap. It is the best thing for South America and South East Asia. It is the best thing for China…it keeps their numbers in check.

As I have always said, one does not have to join some far right movement to kill blacks. Just support the darlings of the Socialists… Mugabe and Mandela. Together they have killed more blacks than all the rightwing whites in the whole of Africa ever did.

Plato said that the best rulers of the world would be the “Philosopher Kings” or rulers who love and search wisdom. Today the Philosophy students of the world read this and understand it as a right to rule so they go into politics, because there is not much else you can do with a doctorate in philosophy.

These are not the people that Plato had in mind to rule the world. In his days philosophers were mathematicians and scientists.

Plato understood that the only people who could and can solve problems are mathematicians, scientists and engineers…call them Technologists.

Politicians and these modern day “philosophers” cannot even solve the simplest of society’s problems. They create them.

Every single problem that we have today is solved by engineers. You want to travel faster from A to B, an engineer will invent a car, a boat, train or airplane. You want to toast your bread, blow-dry your hair or speak to your friends in Japan…an engineer will solve your problem. Whether you want to watch the news, listen to the news or read the news online…An engineer is always there to solve your problem. You want clean water an engineer will build you a dam. You want electricity in your house, an engineer will give it to you. You want to cross a crevice an engineer will build you a bridge. You want roads, highways and railroads, an engineer will solve all of that.

Your car breaks down, you call a mechanic your stove is dead, you call an electrician, your computer gives you trouble you call an information technologist…

What is there that a philosopher can do, apart from talking? All of our problems today are solved by technologists.

A country can easily do without all its philosophers, but it cannot do without its technologists. An engineer can quite easily read philosophy and understand it, but a modern day philosopher is lost when it comes to calculus or solving the Collatz Conjecture.

Philosophers or politicians do not solve wars, they create them. Technologists stop the wars. World War One it was the chemists who stopped the war, World War Two it was the physicists.

In the end the people who will solve the issues in South Africa will not be the “Philosopher Kings” or politicians it will be the Technologists. Malthus said that there are two solutions. Either birthrates must come down or death rates must go up.

Technologists offer a possible third way that technology will increase food production and at the same time stabilize population increase. We have the technology today to totally eradicate poverty and cure almost all diseases. The technology is there today to solve almost all of mankind’s problems.

Do you not think it is time we fire the “Philosopher kings” and get some REAL leaders?

But sometimes even technologists needs philosophers. They should and are sometimes forced to attend ethics lectures, because the same guy who designs a space shuttle is the guy who can design an intercontinental ballistic missile. The same guy who designs a weapon of mass destruction can also design air bags for cars and safety belts that save lives.
The only thing that stops them or keeps them in check is their own ethics their own personal belief system.
………………..
“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

J. Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier.


“War and famine would not do. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved. AIDS is not an efficient killer because it is too slow. My favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s population is airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. “We’ve got airborne diseases with 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that. “You know, the bird flu’s good, too. For everyone who survives, he will have to bury nine”

Dr. Eric Pianka University of Texas evolutionary ecologist showed solutions for reducing the world’s population to an audience on population control.

Dr. Arne Schiotz, a WWF director has said, “Malthus has been vindicated, reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village!

28 July 2011

Thomas Malthus vindicated: South Africa's population has passed the 50 million mark, A two part miniseries. Part One


By Mike Smith
28th of July 2011

Source and inspiration to this series

Since Plato wrote “The Republic” where his teacher Socrates had a few discussion with other student s of philosophy about what they would need to establish their perfect city state, people have thought of the yield of the land, the carrying capacity and eventually two states encroaching on each other leading to war.

It is almost a natural cause and effect.

But you see, old Plato, today regarded as the greatest philosopher of Western Civilization, was a bit of a bastard. He laid the foundations of what we call today the One World Order, or The New World Order.

According to Plato’s ultimate conclusion in “The Republic” the world should be ruled by the chosen ones…so called Philosopher Kings. To him Philosophers are the only true ones worthy of solving the world’s problems.
Now it is very important to understand that what we call philosophers today is not what a philosopher was in Ancient Greece.

The word if broken down in Latin means “Philo” and “Sophie” simply means a love of wisdom. The Ancient Greek philosophers like Pythagoras and Euclid were all brilliant mathematicians and scientists.

Today, philosophers are drunks, junkies and prostitutes…don’t believe me? Go check out the campuses where these people study today all over the world.

Nevertheless, Plato in his search for the most civilized Republic stated that the family unit should be abolished Source

SOCRATES: The law, I said, which is the sequel of this and of all that has preceded, is to the following effect, -- "that the wives of our guardians are to be common, and their children are to be common, and no parent is to know his own child, nor any child his parent." (The Republic, Book V, p. 718)

Plato wrote in “The Republic”, the discussion between Socrates and Adeimantus and Socrates and Glaucon that the state should use deceiving, lying and propaganda techniques and that women should work equally hard as men and do military service equal to men. Source

More shocking are his views on Genetics…

SOCRATES: ... the principle has been already laid down that the best of either sex should be united with the best often, and the inferior with the inferior, as seldom as possible; and that they should rear the offspring of the one sort of union, but not of the other, if the flock is to be maintained in first-rate condition. Now these goings on must be a secret which the rulers only know, or there will be a further danger of our herd, as the guardians may be termed, breaking out into rebellion….aim will be to preserve the average of population. (Book V, p. 721)

And what do you do with the babies??

“The proper officers will take the offspring of the good parents to the pen or fold, and there they will deposit them with certain nurses who dwell in a separate quarter; but the offspring of the inferior, or of the better when they chance to be deformed, will be put away in some mysterious, unknown place, as they should be. (Book V, p. 722)

GLAUCON: Yes ... that must be done if the breed of the guardians is to be kept pure.

And according to Plato, children would have to be forced to attend compulsory schooling in order to separate them from their parents in state schooling so that the state could indoctrinate them…

“How will they proceed? They will begin by sending out into the country all the inhabitants of the city who are more than ten years old, and will take possession of their children, who will be unaffected by the habits of their parents; These they will train in their own habits and laws, I mean in the laws which we have given them: And in this way the state and constitution of which we are speaking will soonest and most easily attain happiness, and the nation which has such a constitution will gain most.” The Republic

There you have it. Marx and Hitler were Jonny come lately’s. They were plagiarists. . The foundations of this recipe to create the perfect Socialist state and the ultimate one world totalitarian and fascist government was laid down 2400 years ago in ancient Greece amongst the so called classical philosophers of the time.

This nonsense is what they teach journalist, social scientists and psychology students at university today, and you wonder where they get all these crackpot ideas from.

The liberal left in the media who condemn the Oslo Shooter as a Radical Rightest are the same people who hold Plato in high regard

If you want to understand the origins of Communism and the One World Utopia of Thomas More, all you have to do is read Plato’s “Republic”. Then you will see where Marx, Malthus and Hitler stole most of their ideas from.

You do not even have to buy the book. Read it online Plato’s Republic

You look at those excerpts from Plato’s “Republic” written 2400 years ago and then you compare it to our modern society today.

Women are told they can follow magnificent careers in society and the military, equal to men, but the truth is that most women are stuck in tiny office cubicles or working as clerks, secretaries or conveyer belt fitters in some factory. Very few women actually make educated careers, but all of them are alienated from their children.

The children are brought up by state or corporate run day-care centers and learning institutions from the age of six to eighteen.

2400 years later the parallels are astonishing. The world we live in today is almost to a tee what Plato envisaged 2400 ago.

26 July 2011

The maniacal paranoia of the Looney Left


By Mike Smith
26th of July 2011

The story about the Oslo Shooter was hardly out or the leftist media jumped at the opportunity to brand the shooter a “rightwing extremist”, “Christian fundamentalist” and “conservative fanatic”, “racist”, “Nazi” and heaven knows what other leftist swear words they could muster.

Like a spring pollen feast amongst Namaqualand daisies they were cross pollinating and self pollinating each other with their lies trying to cover up all evidence that the shooter was in fact one of their own. He was a lefty.

Their proof that he was conservative and Christian is as scarce as teeth on a duck, being all of a falsified Facebook page and a plagiarized 1500 page document, only apparently compiled by the shooter. Their main evidence that the shooter had to be a Nazi (a leftist ideology) is obviously the fact that he is Norse, blond, tall and blue-eyed…Despite the evidence that he was a supporter of Israel.

But none of this could deter the desperate rabid leftists who were seeing “Christian Terrorists” behind every bush to smear the right, before anyone could discover it was one of their own.

I do not know why it is such a surprise that he was left. The left has been responsible for more than a hundred million deaths in the last century. Stalin, Mao Ze Tung, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mandela, the ANC…were al terrorists of the worst order and guess what? They were all left.

Nevertheless, journalists of the leftist media have always made this scum their darlings. They are in love with tyranny as Jamie Glasov says in his book, “United in Hate; The Left’s romance with tyranny and terror”. Point in case is the Marxist terrorist and mass murderer Nelson Mandela who is worshipped by the left as a virtual god, despite the USA having had him on their list of the most dangerous terrorists until 2008 and him having to get a special visa to travel there.

The left always tries to cover up these facts of history and tries to make the conservatives out as the extremists. For years they have used the word “racist” as a synonym for “conservative”, but seeing that it has lost effect and the conservative movement in Europe and the USA has grown exponentially in the last few years, they have now found a new synonym for “conservative” namely “terrorist”.

The latest attempts come from a leftist Afrikaans journalist from the Beeld newspaper called Neels Jackson.

In an article in Beeld He claims that “the danger exists that young Afrikaner men can snap and pull off a mass murdering stunt such as Anders Behring Breivik did”.

His idiotic sensationalist and attention seeking hypothesis is based on the allegation that Anders apparently used a bit of material from a South African website I Luv South Africa, but hate my government in his 1500 page rant.

A quick look at ILUVSA will show that the entire website is in English and fairly mild. Beeld’s own online forums are ten times worse. How Mr. Jackson makes the connotation that Afrikaner men are potential mass murderers because Anders visited an English website is beyond logic…but this is exactly what he did.

What Mr. Jackson further forgets or ignores is that in the last South African elections three months ago, 90% of the Afrikaners voted for the liberal, leftist DA (Democratic Alliance) not for the right, but in his delusional mind they are all potential conservative mass murderers. His mental gymnastics is embarrassing to watch.

Apparently one quote from ILUVSA that Anders borrowed was “the modern South Africa, ‘The Rainbow Nation’, where under black rule the Marxist ANC are viciously persecuting whites and where the Boers are facing a murderous genocide and where poignantly, let’s not forget, many black people are now suffering far more than they ever did under apartheid”.

First of all, I fail to see what is wrong with that quote. It is the truth and reported in the main stream media on a daily basis, including Beeld newspaper. I can show him 20 other websites that says the same things or worse including the comments in the online forums of Beeld, Die Burger and all the Media24 papers that he works for.

He should rather go to the online forum of the Sowetan articles and go see what potential mass murders look like and what they say…how they would love to kill the whites and kill white babies.

It is not hard to determine what Mr Jackson wants. He wants the white Afrikaners to shut the hell up and just die quietly. When their wives and children are raped tortured and killed in their homes, the whites who dare mention it anywhere online are…you guessed it…potential mass murdering terrorists.

When Marxist Cosatu and the ANC organizes massive violent marches and protests, where they burn schools and kill each other then these people are never referred to as Left-wing extremists…no they are just poor discontented protesters. This is the hypocrisy of the leftist media. The left-extremists are innocent angels and the right are dangerous monsters and potential mass murderers.

By this same logic, every person who voted for the ANC or the DA are potential Stalins or Mao’s, but Mr. Jackson prefers to do a mental flick-flack across this simple fact.

It is clear that Anders constructed his 1500 page rant from various sources…books, philosophers and websites…are all the people who read the same books or study the same philosophers now potential murderers? Is the entire ethics class of Afrikaans Stellenbosch University students now candidates for Guantanamo Bay? And don’t even mention the world-wide six million members of the Freemasons…all potential mass murderers now.

To give some credibility to his crackpot theories, he knocked on the door of a UNISA academic, Prof. Thomashausen (Foreign Law).

Some more cross pollination of sick liberal minds took place, because the astute professor said that it is possible that something like Oslo can also happen in South Africa.

It is also possible that a jet can fall out of the sky onto his office. It is also possible that a train can derail and run sideways through his auditorium. It is also possible that ANC extremist demonstrators can run amok and kill all whites in sight. Come on…What nonsense is this?

But ironically the professor says that the white men will snap, because they feel they do not have a voice and no-one is listening to them. At the same time they want to close down the websites where these men still have a voice and a bit of a relief valve to vent their steam. They should actually encourage more such websites, because if these websites did not exist, the men would be busy doing lot worse things than raging their frustrations online.


Maybe the wild and paranoid speculations of Mr.Neels Jackson and Professor Thomashausen are true. Maybe it is possible that a discontented young Afrikaner equipped with a legal firearm has the potential to be a mass murderer…

Just like Jackson and Thomashausen’s wives are fully equipped to be potential prostitutes…the question is, “Are they?”

24 July 2011

The latest Afriforum Afrikaner pacifier trick


By Mike Smith
24th of July 2011

Sometimes I do not know whether I should laugh at the Afrikaners, pity them, cry about them or get angry with them.

Take the organization Afriforum for instance. A civil rights initiative of the Solidarity Union, in which most Afrikaners trust and believe.

During Apartheid one hardly ever heard of any white unions and the ones that did exist were quietly operating in the background. Then suddenly after 1994 when the Marxist ANC terrorists were handed the reins, Solidarity stepped to the front.

Sorry but this organization is just a dummy or pacifier for the discontented Afrikaners.

It is like Lenin said: “The best opposition is the one you created yourself”.

Every time I see these Afriforum or Solidarity pacifiers in the media I want to throw up. I immediately start thinking about and getting visions from the 1980’s TV news showing the Polish Solidarity leader of the time, Lech Walesa, “Fighting Communism”. It turned out this hero of the Polish people was a Communist agent all along

How can the Afrikaners be so ignorant as to trust these jackals in sheep’s clothing?

The danger lights should have started flashing when Dr Dirk Herman distributed his pathetic little booklet on the good practices to implement Affirmative Action. Every Afrikannerbond member got a copy.

He did his doctorate on the subject now considers himself the expert on Affirmative Action and the man is fully convinced that it is entirely possible to pick a turd up by the clean end.

Then came the case of Julias Malema’s (ANC Youth league leader) unconstitutional hate speech of singing “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer”. Afriforum took him to court and all the Afrikaners with their sense of fair play rejoiced, because finally here were people willing to stand up to a scoundrel like Malema calling for their genocide, but they were going to do it by Queensbury rules…


Then what did Afriforum do? They wanted to settle out of court with this semi literate Bi-ped gangster. Totally lost their credibility in my eyes.

That is the problem. Afriforum wants to tackle Malema with kid gloves every time when he is coming at them with a knuckle duster. When will they learn to knock the bastard down and get on his chest with a baseball bat?

Nevertheless, now Afriforum/Solidarity has unveiled their latest Afrikaner pacifying plan after Malema was exposed in the Sunday press for taking bribes and corruption…They are going to take him to court…again.

Judging on their previous attempt with the hate speech trial, I would say they should rather let it be, because all they are going to do is waste their member’s money and settle out of court. AfriForum lays graft charge against Julius Malema . What a bunch of pathetic clowns they are.

I mean who does Afriforum/Solidarity think they are fooling here with their Jan Wilkens against the Strongbow Brothers fight? Forget it…they are more like the Waltons against the Strongbow brothers.

Media lies exposed. Alleged “Conservative Christian” Norway shooter was a Lefty


By Mike Smith
24th of July 2011

The cyber ink of my last post has hardly dried before more truth started to surface. More people are asking exactly the same questions as I…

The leftist plot in the smear campaign against White Christian Conservatives is thickening… From the start things did not gel in this case and my instincts were telling me that there is something seriously fishy in this episode. From past experience I have learned not to trust a single word the mainstream media mentions and to question everything. My instincts have been proven right…

Who altered the Norway Shooter’s Facebook Profile to “Christian” and “Conservative” after his name was released in the media?


A Jihadi group first claimed responsibility and then retracted it. Why?


”Christian” and “Conservative” was added to his Facebook page yesterday AFTER his name was released by the media. By whom?

Anders Behring Breivik’s FB page faked and then removed

Originally I thought and accepted the lying liberal crap that he was a member of a “Far Right Party” or a Nationalist Party even ….it just shows again that I should check my facts more diligently. This so called “Far Right Party” as the main stream media claims is called the “Progress Party”. Wikipedia entry calls it a ”Conservative LIBERAL Party” in other words slightly less to the left than the Socialists.

It is the second biggest party in Norway.

There you have it. If anything then Anders Behring Breivik is a Left-wing Liberal sold to the public by the lying Leftist main stream media as a “Conservative Christian extremist and fundamentalist”…

Excuse my language, but what utter BOLLOCKS! Watch this space as the liberal lies unfolds…

Watch the video below.

The Norway shooting update. Another Kennedy or 9/11 lie in the making?


By Mike Smith
24th of July 2011

So far there are more questions than answers about this horrible incident. I reject these actions with disgust and contempt, yet one has to stay objective here.

The leftist main stream media is subjective, irresponsible and practices hate speech against white, Christian conservatives.

The police have not identified the suspect, The media has identified him as Anders Behring Breivik . At this stage it is not confirmed. It is all allegations and speculations.

This guy has not been in a court of law. He has not even pleaded. How can the media simply crucify him and smear him like this with no evidence?

Anders Behring Breivik in this report admitted responsibility. Another report says that the suspect admitted to have fired a gun on the island. He did not admit that he killed anybody.

What does that mean? It is not a confession, and even if he does confess, it is quite common in such mass murder cases that several people come forward, claim responsibility and confess. Where is the proof? Where are his friends, siblings and parents?

Several reports like this one said there were at least two gunmen.

Eyewitnesses said there were more shooters

Most reports states that the shooter was dressed in a police uniform, which raises the question about where did he obtain it? However another report states that there were two gunmen. According to these reports, while the prime suspect, Anders Behring Breivik, was wearing a sweater with a police emblem on it during the shooting, the second man was not dressed in any kind of official uniform.

The brilliant investigative journalists found all the information on Facebook. Picture, religion, political orientation, everything down to the books he read and the video games he played. Anybody with half a brain knows that false profiles can be created on FB and one can type in anything from a false age to false friends. One can even make use of a body-double that looks like Anders Behring Breivik to do all the shooting and then smear him afterwards. How can the media simply assume that what stands on FB is the truth? For all we know he could be gay. Who cares?

They have already started accusing him of being a Nazi as well. According to one lady who was an escaped eyewitness, the shooter with the machine gun, “Looked like a scene from a Nazi Film.”

One moderator expressed surprise that this man did not have a skinhead and that he was a good looking and nice person by all accounts.

Then a further connection to Nazis was made by the Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg who said that Norway has not experienced such an atrocity since World War II.

I wish the media would make up their minds about Anders Behring Breivik. Is he a Rightwing, Christian, Conservative or is he a Nazi? Because he cannot be both…Nazism is a leftwing fanatical ideology.

The people that Anders Behring Breivik apparently and allegedly shot were from the Norwegian Socialist “Labour Party”…(Arbeiterspartei)

The original name of the Nazi Party was the National Socialist German Labour Party. (Arbeiterspartei)…Totally LEFT of the political spectrum, not right. Can you see the similarity? Both were Socialist Labour Party.

One would expect supposedly educated and well informed journalists to at least know the difference between Nationalism and National Socialism. They are diametrically opposite to each other.

Nevertheless. Why would Anders Behring Breivik shoot his own people? The media also says that he is racist, Christian Conservative…what the hell is that? It is nothing but disgusting hate speech against White Conservative Christians. If he was so “Racist”, why shoot his own people and not the other races he has a problem with? Why not blow up their mosques and buildings instead of his own government buildings?

Latest is that they are targeting PC-gamers. How much more ridiculous can you get. So now if you play Warcraft you are a “racist Christian”, because you command your Paladin Knights against the poor Orcs. Those poor little Orcs that just wants to invade your land kill you and sack your villages. It is absurd I tell you…How old are these “Journalists”?

The profile the media has constructed so far of his “crimes” is thus:

Tall, white man with blond hair and blue eyes.
A legal gun-owner.
He belonged to a mainstream Nationalist Party.
A conservative Christian
A Patriot
A Freemason,
A bio-farmer who legally bought six tons of fertilizer
A Warcraft Gamer
A Facebook poster
He objected to multiculturalism online.

Everything fully legal. No crime in any of the above whatsoever, yet the Leftist media thinks it good to crucify the man as a racist, Nazi, rightwing-extremist, Christian fundamentalist…can they add any more connotations…Did they leave something out perhaps? Ridiculous junk.

This entire shooting act is totally against everything this alleged suspect stood for. It is against the teachings of Christianity, against patriotism and against the ideals of Freemasonry.

Totally irresponsible ignorant and absurd journalists, not even worthy of the name. Where is the objectivism? Where is the “innocent until proven guilty”?

To me it is clear who is in the leftist media crosshairs here and it is not Anders Behring Breivik. It is the Conservative Christian and Caucasian Male, the backbone of western civilization.

But why? Because the Conservative Christian and Caucasian Male is the one that sees through their leftist lies and spins about a multi-cultural socialist one-world order utopia and is resisting them every step of their diabolical way. That is why he has to be character assassinated and the little sheeple driven in the socialist direction.

This is pure desperation on the side of the fanatical left... As if they know their dirty tricks and lies are not working on the right so they have to step it up a gear.

One thing is for sure. Media mogul Rupert Murdoch must be smiling, because a few days ago the entire world was focused on his media network that was caught spying and tapping phones of the public, including 9/11 victims. Now one hears nothing about Murdoch anymore. I wonder how many phones of 22/7 victims he has tapped.

Nevertheless, it seems like another “Lone-nutter-assassin” story is being concocted here complete with a suspect with a middle name…same as John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald and Mark David Chapman. I won’t be surprised if the suspect never sees a trial. He will probably be found not mentally fit to stand trial and shoved off to some looney bin and the public will never know the truth…But I am speculating.

For now, let us keep an open mind.

23 July 2011

The Norway shooting: Who are the REAL fanatics?


By Mike Smith
23rd of July 2011
By now you have probably all heard about the horrible shooting and bombing in Norway by Anders Behring B. the aledged mass murderer who shot 84 people on a holiday island in Norway

Hardly had the story broke or the European and world news agencies such as Euronews, N24, etc were looking for the usual suspects, Muslim or Rightwing extremists. Funny how they never refer to Left-wing extremists. It is as if Left-wing extremism does not exists.

First they made fanatical Muslims the guilty ones. Then a few hours later a suspect Anders Behring B. was arrested and then you should have seen the media, boy what a spectacle…

The words, “Right-wing Extremist”, “Rightwing Christian Fanatic” and “Rightwing Conservative fundamentalist” were rolling off the lips of the European television presenters, literally hundred times a minute.

Every television station or radio station you changed over to were, blasted “Rightwing”, “Nationalist”, “Conservative”, “Fanatic”, “terrorist” all in the same breath. It is to get sick from.

They even spared no time to give exact descriptions of the alleged murderer…”1,93 meters tall, blonde, blue eyes. Normally when a Muslim or black mass murderer goes on the rampage there is neither a mention of his description nor a mention of his name. The information only surfaces days later.

Not in the Norwegian shooting case. Spiegel Online have exact descriptions of him complete with pictures. First they said he is blond, blue-eyed and unscrupulous
Now I see they also say that he is a conservative Christian, a “Muslim Hater” and a “Freemason”

I mean…is there anything they have left out?

Not even Josef Goebbels could dream up such fanatic blackening in the darkest days of Nazism.

So let me give you a full description of who the enemy of the Fanatical left-wing Liberal media is, because it is clear who they want to crucify here.

He is tall, obviously male, and white, from a Nordic race, blonde, blue eyes, Christian, Conservative, Nationalist and a member of a secret society. There you have it. The most disgusting enemy of the Fanatical Left.

If he was Black, the probably would have blamed poverty, slavery, colonialism and Apartheid for his deeds and made him a victim of social circumstances.

This story reminded me of the issue with Jared Taylor of American Renaissance a few months ago when a shooter, incidentally also called Jared, but Jared Lee Loughner (22) went on a rampage in Arizona shooting congress woman Gabrielle Griffords (a Jew)

Within minutes Loughner was presented to the world by the fanatical Left-wing media as

Jared Lee Loughner, Arizona Shooter, Had Ties To Anti-Government American Renaissance: Anti-Immigration, Anti-Semitic

It turned out to be all junk. First of all Jared Lee Loughner was a leftwing extremist and nutter with a history of drug and alcohol abuse (military refused him) who saw the congresswoman as a traitor to the liberal cause. It further turned out that he was Jewish himself and possibly dabbling in the occult and who read “Mein Kampf” just to irritate his Jewish mother.

On Amren, Jared Taylor had to defend himself against a vicious smear campaign by the fanatical liberal media . At the time I still came to his defense with a serious of articles on the SA Sucks blog. I also wrote to Jared Taylor personally and pledged my support, because I knew from the start that it was all nonsense.

Once the truth surfaced, the media were all quiet. Now, nobody even speaks about it anymore, but the damage and blackening of the conservative right was already done. That is how propaganda works.

Let us watch this episode develop and see if the Liberal fanatics in the media again end up with egg on their faces.

So far it has emerged that his favourite books were “The Trial” by liberal Jewish author Franz Kafka, John Stuart Mills’ "On Liberty" and Richard Rortys "Consequences of Pragmatism

All are liberal authors…To this day the president of the British Liberals and the Liberal Democrats gets handed a copy of John Stuart Mills’ book….but, hey, do not let the fanatical leftwing media lose a chance to slag off the Conservative Christian and Nationalist right-wing.

Also read my article at:
http://praag.co.uk/columns/mike-smith/747-the-norway-shooting-who-are-the-real-fanatics.html

22 July 2011

ANC lies exposed and countered



By Mike Smith
22nd of July 2011

Here you can see the lies coming from the president’s office. Mngadi is the chief director for communications (Jacob Zuma’s chief Spin-doctor) in the Office of the President, in the Presidency.

It comes after allegations in the Sowetan that President Zuma is an utter failure and that blacks are starting to question whether the New (Improved) South Africa is really better than Apartheid South Africa.

He comes up with figures quoted from nowhere. No proof of any of these statistics, but wants to dazzle a few stupid liberal whites and their beloved noble savages with a few figures.

Problem with the ANC is that nobody swallows their lies anymore. It is so easy to counter, expose their lies and prove them wrong. They have zero credibility. Everyone can see they are only in it to enrich themselves and bugger the poor. But let us have a look at these ANC lies anyway, because this is standard ANC spin to convince blacks that the ANC is good towards them and that South Africa under ANC corruption and misrule is better than Apartheid South Africa. One finds these recurrent lies on several online forums and in several debates so it is good to be armed with the truth in such instances.

1. More than two million houses have been built for the poor, giving shelter to over 10million people.

Truth: The building of houses by the ANC is nothing but a money making racket fraught with nepotism and corruption. Billions of Rands is spent on houses that fall apart after three months and which have to be rebuilt later at astronomical costs later. When a house has to be rebuilt several times, one cannot count it as several houses.
R1,3bn needed to rebuild horrible RDP houses
Condemned ANC houses have to be rebuilt

2. Six million households have gained access to clean water since 1994 and electricity has been connected to nearly five million homes. In 1994, only 62percent of households had access to clean drinking water, today 93percent do.

Truth: This is a blatant lie and in fact there is a water crisis in South Africa. A combination of polluted water sources and poor management of dams, sewerage works and treatment plants has led to a situation where our water supply is under serious threat. Acid water is flooding the abandoned mines.
South Africa’s dirty water crisis thanks to ANC neglect and incompetence
South Africa’s water crisis is real not looming

3. In 1994, only 50percent of households had access to decent sanitation, today 77percent do. In 1994, only 36percent of South Africans had access to electricity, today 84percent do.

Truth: Another thumb suck and blatant lie. Truth is that South African sewage works have been run down, and neglected to levels where catastrophic diseases can break out. Even the ANC government admitted their failure and neglect.
SA 'drowning in sewage'
Sewage works neglected - govt
SA sewage a disaster waiting to happen

4. Today the majority of people are provided free basic services in water and electricity.

Truth: Another blatant ANC lie. First of all there is no such thing as free services. The 9% minority of whites subsidizes the services for blacks where it is delivered, which is seldom. For the last seven years already there are almost daily strikes and protests against ANC poor service delivery throughout the country 17 years after the ANC has taken over. Local municipalities are fraught with corruption, outright theft and self enrichment. Protests are violently suppressed by the police. Electricity is stolen and infrastructure is sabotaged.
SA hit by service-delivery protests
SA Police brutality and service delivery protests
Rebellion of the poor. SA service delivery protests
Electricity theft costs Eskom billions
President Zuma says electricity theft should be fought
Electricity theft and non-payment - Impact on the SA generation capacity crisis
Cable theft worsens. Threatens South Africa’s power supply
Mbeki admits the government is at fault for South Africa’s electricity crisis

5. By 2010, close to 15million people were receiving social grants. Of those, 9,5million are children aged under 14 years, compared with just 2,4million in 1996. This year the child support grant has been extended to children up to the age of 18 years, an additional two million children, in order to alleviate poverty.

Truth: People should get jobs not grants. This is an admission of failure that the ANC is incapable of creating jobs for a quarter of blacks in SA. It is an admission that they punish and take money from the productive hardworking taxpayers and rewards the unproductive and lazy. It is a recipe for disaster. The system is fraught with people claiming extra grants with false ID documents and claiming thre-four grants of deceased people.
Millions more will get social grants
Massive social grant fraud uncovered
R238m lost to social grant fraud
6 000 public servants in KwaZulu-Natal being investigated and could be arrested for fraud and corruption involving social grants


6. More than 400000 children receive government subsidies to attend early childhood development centres. More than 8million children at primary and secondary schools benefit from school feeding schemes.

Truth: Since 1995 the fraud and corruption involved with the feeding schemes of black school children in South Africa have been reported. They even poisoned black children with toxic peanut butter just to make a quick few bucks. White school children, even poor ones are not helped by a school feeding scheme. Only black children are.
Incompetence and fraud threaten school feeding programme
Fraud probe launched in peanut butter scandal

7. This year government announced expanded access to tertiary education. Student loans are now being converted into bursaries for qualifying final-year students. Students in further education and training colleges who qualify for financial aid are now exempted from paying fees.

Truth: White students do not qualify for bursaries, only blacks do. Blacks study for free where whites have to pay exorbitant fees. Entry standards for whites are much higher than for blacks. The white minority of 9% is racially discriminated against at school and university level. School certificates and report cards are falsified on a massive scale, which means that black students get into university illegally. White matric student’s marks are manipulated down and black’s marks are manipulated up.
Five arrested for school fraud
Cops seize 500,000 exam papers
Matric results manipulated
How SA matric results gets manipulated
University of Cape Town Racist quota system
UCT admission policy racist
Top white Afrikaner student refused bursary at Armscor
Whites now allowed access to Denel bursaries
Racism against white students at South African Universities

8. Crime is declining. The murder rate, for example, declined by 8,6 percent in 2010.

Truth: Another lie and manipulation, probably the biggest one of them all. There is currently a moratorium on crime statistics in South Africa. The public is not allowed to know the true extent of crime. When figures are released it is out of date and heavily massaged and manipulated. Police bungle cases that leads to low conviction rates. Forensic laboratories are overloaded. Police dockets, post mortem reports disappear and top police officers like Mzwandile Petros gave orders to falsify dockets.
Petros gave order to falsify Tony Yengeni’s drunk driving ddocket
How cops cooked crime books to reflect lower incidence of violent crime
Cloud over murder statistics as filing cabinet with post mortem reports discovered
South Africa’s murder rate far higher than reported
SA Crime Statistics: Facts & Fallacies

Baragwanath: Hospital of shame exposed

By Mike Smith
22nd of July 2011


There are many of these microcosms in South Africa, but the Baragwanath Hospital in Soweto has to be one of the prime examples of a microcosm of decay that can be seen all over South Africa under the Marxist ANC government.

The Baragwanath hospital is the largest in the world. It was built by the white Apartheid government specifically to service the black people in Soweto. When the ANC took over the government they renamed the hospital after their Communist leader Chris Hani.

During the 1980’s under Apartheid it was a state of the art hospital leading the world in trauma care, eye care and rare tropical disease research.

Today it is a dump. A few years ago I met an insider who worked with the statistics of the hospital. According to this person, every single patient at Baragwanath is immediately tested for HIV/Aids upon entry and 95% of all the patients are HIV positive.

This white person refused to go into the halls anymore, because “the patients are dying like flies”. I was told how the halls stink and how dead bodies lay there for days before being removed.

Now the Mail and Guardian reporter, Nikolaus Bauer and photographer Demelza Bush have exposed the hospital and its mortuary. The evidence complete with eyewitness reports and pictures was presented to the Gauteng Health Department and the hospital management, who (naturally) denied it all. They called it “the work of saboteurs“…

"As far as we're concerned [the exposé] was incorrect information and part of ongoing sabotage that we are currently dealing with," said Nkosiyethu Mazibuko, the hospital's public relations officer.

How are they going to fix the problem when they refuse to admit that a problem exists?

It is this “head-in-the-sand” attitude that is the problem with blacks and liberal whites alike. No matter how bad things are in South Africa. No matter how much evidence one rubs under their noses, they simply refuse to admit it.

It is a sick mindset of belief in a delusional stupid pipe-dream called “The Rainbow Nation”. What a croc of liberal trash. Communism must be the opium of the proletariat, because there is no way any sane and sober person can still believe that the New South Africa is somehow better than it was under Apartheid, but if you look out there and you read the forums of online newspapers then you never seem to find a shortage of these believers.

In their minds it is not important that thousands of blacks are dying in South Africa, because of the direct incompetence, corruption and idiotic policies of the ANC…what is important is that “The Dream” is being kept alive.

South Africa is sinking faster than the Titanic and delusional liberals are clutching at the little lifebuoys called “Hope” still floating around in the sea of chaos, but hope just prolongs the torment of man.

Here are some excerpts from the articles:

“The hospital's morgue is storing more than 90 adult cadavers that have long passed the statutory 30 days for bodies to be kept in a mortuary.”


“There are also the corpses of more than 100 babies who were either stillborn or died after being abandoned at birth, with as many as 30 piled on a tray designed for a single adult cadaver.”


“Many bodies are piled on top of one another in fridges and others lie in an open-plan refrigerator, littered on stretchers and stacked on shelves, most in an advanced stage of decomposition and exuding a sharp stench.”


The articles can be read and more pictures can be viewed here:

Hospital denies mortuary chaos -- despite the evidence
Bara mortuary worker fired after M&G investigation
Bodies pile up at Bara morgue



21 July 2011

Lives of white farmers worth less than that of animals


By Mike Smith
21st of July 2011

Don’t get me wrong. I am all for the protection of our wild life and feel poachers should be shot on the spot, but sometimes I wonder where the priorities of the ANC government lays.

In the old days we had a Para military force known as the Commando system which protected farmers against attacks from blacks. The ANC has done away with the Commando system and left the farmers vulnerable. Thousands of farmers and their family members have been tortured, raped and killed since then.

I hold the ANC fully responsible for every farm attack since they abandoned the Commando system.

They have now also employed a full military force and allocated vast resources in Kruger National Park to fight poachers streaming in from Mozambique. This is fully the fault of the ANC and most notably Thabo Mbeki who did away with the electrified fence between South Africa and Mozambique on the edge of the Kruger Park.

This is so typical of all the disasters of the ANC. It is all self created. The ANC creates their own chaos and then wastes vast resources to fix their own stuff-ups.

If only they would sit on their hands and do nothing, then the country would be far better off.

We should round the ANC up and fence them in on a reserve where they can “Suip” and “Vreet” and lie in the sun all day, receiving a massive salary for doing nothing. That is right. I am 100% for paying the useless ANC scum to do absolutely nothing, because it is when they venture into something and actually attempts to do something that it all falls apart and turns to shit. Like reverse King Midas. Everything the ANC touches turns to shit.

Nevertheless, so far 222 Rhinos have been killed by poachers in the Kruger Park this year. The poachers are military armed and trained . According to the report below, they are armed with AK 47’s and hand grenades. They are excellent marksmen, trackers and are paramilitary trained. They do not just poach the rhinos, they fight against the SANDF. It comes down to a military invasion by Mozambiquen soldiers onto SA territory. Where else did these bastards get the weapons and the training from?

222 Rhinos killed are more or less the same as the amount of White farmers killed this year. Why do the ANC not employ a force and allocate resources to protect the white farmers? Are their lives worth less than that of a Rhino?

No, the farmers are left to fend for themselves and even arrested when they protect themselves against armed and violent attackers. The ANC does not spend a single resource on the white farmers.

http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/major-boost-in-resources-to-fight-poachers-1.1103126

18 July 2011

My Mandela Dream


By Mike Smith
18th of July 2011

I don’t know if it was Mandela’s birthday working on my brain or just all the crap happening in South Africa, but last night I had a terrible dream…
I dreamt I was in a very hot place…flames everywhere…tortured souls wailing and gnashing their teeth surrounding me.

Suddenly I passed a terrible being with horns, a pointy tail and a trident in his hand, he hissed in my direction…”Welcome to Hell…take a seat over there so long…”

Over at the other side was a pool of fire and brimstone bubbling away, flames shooting up out of it every few seconds. Around it were several deck chairs arranged like a hammer and sickle occupied by strange looking, but familiar characters reading books. On closer inspection I recognized them, despite their contorted faces…their teeth blunt from all the gnashing…

Sharing one chair, holding hands and reading the Communist Manifesto, were Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels…hardly recognizable anymore; their beards singed away and curled up…

Next to them Lenin, Stalin and Mao were fighting over a chair…Mao was adamant…HE wears the title of “Chairman”, therefore HE gets the chair…stuff sharing.

Over in the corner wearing donkey’s ears and facing the wall were Hitler and Churchill…

Strangely I could not see any blacks amongst them, until I stumbled over a sign that read, “Apartheid: No blacks past this point”…then I saw them…they were all there on the black side…Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr, Oliver Tambo, Chris Hani, Joe Modise, Nadine Gordimer and Helen Suzmann too…I guessed they finally got to live amongst their beloved blacks.

There were some vacant chairs as well with “reserved” stickers attached to them. They read, “Reserved for Malema”, “Reserved for Zuma”, “Reserved for Winnie”, “Reserved for Thabo”, Reserved for De Klerk”, etc….but not a single unreserved chair or one with my name on it…

I searched further, checking around…and then I saw one... A nice comfortable Lazy-Boy kick-out-your-feet type of job. At first I could not believe that it was not occupied already. Further it had no label on it.

So I decided to sit down and make myself comfortable, but just as I moved my bum towards the seat, that ugly bastards with the the horns and pointy tail stuck his trident in my ass and said, “Not here…This is Nelson Mandela’s chair”.

Like a jet I leaped up…halfway through my leap I woke up and realized I was standing next to my bed, sweat dripping off my forehead. Boy was I relieved it was only a dream and a bed-spring that stuck me in the ass.

17 July 2011

The Abel Malan saga: A review


By Mike Smith
17th of July 2011

This past week saw a mini revolt in Afrikaner ranks when Abel Malan, a businessman from the Eastern Transvaal punched a liberal philosophy professor of the Afrikaans Stellenbosch University called Anton van Niekerk in the face.

Abel Malan is also a leader of the VVK (Volksraad Verkiesings Kommissie) or National-Council Electoral Commission, an organization peacefully campaigning for self-rule for the Afrikaner people of South Africa.

Abel Malan is also a former soldier of the SADF and veteran of the South African Border War (1966-1989) .

What led to the miniature riot started with a letter by the academic Anton van Niekerk in the Afrikaans newspaper “Beeld” on the 4th of July 2011 called Afrikaners het baie skuld (Afrikaners have a lot of guilt).

The article started off with the professor acknowledging that a shift has taken place in the guilt feelings of Afrikaners and that they are awakening to the truth about their proud heritage and legacy.

It is true...Afrikaners are shedding the negative Marxist propaganda against them, studying their history and are newly embracing the truth about their intrepid forefathers. The revival in Afrikaner Nationalism and the want to be independent is quite noticeable and undeniable at the moment.

There is also currently a musical on about the Border War called “Tree Aan!” (Fall In!), awakening the pride of our former soldiers who served in the SADF in their 23 year war against Marxist terrorist forces on the border between South West Africa (Namibia) and Angola.

Van Niekerk’s sarcastic rant was nothing but utter hate speech against the Afrikaners. Professor Van Niekerk not only downplayed the role of the SADF in establishing a relatively democratic South Africa instead of a full blown communist one, but glorified the communists and vilified the SADF soldiers.

The demented liberal Van Niekerk inseminated and poisoned his own mind with his pseudo historical reality and tried to sell his onanism of Marxist terrorists off as “freedom of speech”.

He made Afrikaners solely and collectively responsible and guilty of the so called “Crime of Apartheid” despite not a single person to date ever having been found guilty of this so-called crime.

His lunatic rhetoric took the course of established liberal junk allegations such as that a small minority of Afrikaners were unable “to pick themselves up by their bootstraps” and are only successful through the oppression of blacks in South Africa.

The professor gave not a single example to his hallucinating allegations and ignored all evidence pointing to the contrary. The evidence of infrastructure such as schools, hospitals, universities, etc that benevolent Afrikaners built for blacks not only in South Africa, but also in Namibia is there for all to see.

The schooling given by whites to black Ovambo and Herero children, the hospitals and clinics that saved thousands of black lives on the border were all run by SADF military officers and personnel.

This is the people that Van Niekerk so despised in his article… It is clear that his ignorance about Apartheid South Africa and the soldiers of the Border War speaks volumes.

Abel Malan is a former lieutenant and paratrooper who served on the border and who knows the truth of what the SADF did there. The legacy of the SADF doctors, medical personnel, etc is well documented in many books available today, yet the enlightened professor has either never read any of these books or simply choose to ignore the evidence. He is therefore either genuinely ignorant or maliciously and deliberately spreading disinformation, lies and hate speech against Afrikaners and former SADF soldiers, with his haughty and boring harangue.

Nevertheless, after this article, Professor Van Niekerk was contacted by Abel Malan to discuss the contents of his article at his office at Stellenbosch University. It seems as if the Prof for some or other reason anticipated violence from Abel Malan, a respected and educated family man and who holds a B.Sc. degree in agricultural-economics.

The professor organized a guard from campus security to stand by whilst the article was being discussed. What exactly was said during the discussion is until now unclear, but it seems as if Abel Malan was provoked by the professor, overturned his desk and punched him.

One cannot help but feel that Malan was lured into a trap to make the VVK look like a bunch of aggressive ruffians. In typical cowardly liberal fashion, the Professor’s mouth was only big when he knew he had back-up in the form of the security guard. Obviously too scared to face the man himself.

Malan was arrested and is currently sitting in the Stellenbosch police cells awaiting his bail hearing. He is also on a hunger strike.

Soon afterwards, the anticipated smear campaign against Malan started in the media as it would be for every Afrikaner Nationalist who dares to stand up for his people.

An article in Beeld tried to paint the burly former soldier as scared in the police cells and not so tough after all. Comments are being manipulated on the online forums to suppress the support for Malan and advance his condemnation.

Various prominent liberals, most notably the hypocritical Marxist Afrikaans poet Breyten Breytenbach, who served a term in prison for high treason and his sidekick traitor academic Prof Willie Esterhuyse (also of Stellenbosch) who was instrumental in secret negotiations and whisky drinking between the National Intelligence Services and the ANC to hand the country over to Marxist terrorist scum, climbed on the bandwagon condemning the violent behavior of Malan.

Other liberals on forums echoed this condemnation of Malan with clichés such as, “Violence does not solve anything…etc”

What makes their condemnation so much more hypocritical is that when the ANC terrorists used violence to oppose the Apartheid regime, they never condemned them or said, “Violence does not solve anything”.

When the cowardly ANC terrorists used bombs to blow up innocent Afrikaners in pubs and shopping centers and laid landmines on farm roads to blow up farmers and their families, these liberals called them "honourable freedom fighters".

When the ANC youth leader, Julias Malema called for the killing of white Afrikaners and farmers or confiscating their farms with no compensation then, the voices of these haughty liberals were silent in their condemnation.

When white Afrikaners are today violently assaulted, tortured for hours, raped and killed on their farms and in their homes by blacks, then one hardly hears a peep out of these liberals. The politically correct Afrikaans newspapers such as Beeld, Die Burger and Rapport are never honest about the races of the victims and/or perpetrators.

…but let one Afrikaner punch a liberal in the mouth for his disgusting hate speech then the condemnation is non-stop in the news for days.

The vilification of Afrikaners by liberals such as Van Niekerk, and by the liberal media cannot be underestimated. It has nothing to do with freedom of speech. It is blatant hate speech.

It polarizes whites and blacks and it leads to more violent attacks on white South Africans. If talking does not help anymore and if a violent punch in the mouth is what it is going to take to stop the attacks on white Afrikaners then I say Abel Malan was fully in his right to punch the living daylights out of Van Niekerk.

Violence cannot always be condoned, just as it cannot always be disregarded as a solution to a problem. Sometimes violence is fully justified and necessary such as when one is under brutal attack.

Against a violent murdering or raping enemy, no amount of sweet talking is going to get him to stop or change his mind…no…only violence will stop the brutality. The irresponsible verbal vomit of liberals such as that of Van Niekerk, fans this brutality against white South Africans.

When you ask any policeman out there, he will tell you that defense is good. That walls, burglar bars, alarm systems, etc are all fine, but all defensive and therefore limited in its effectiveness…

He will further tell you that the only way to really stop the violent attacks is to somewhere along the line go on the offensive. You have to get out on the street and stop the bastards in their tracks.

It is clear that Abel Malan and many Afrikaners have now reached that stage where talking does not seem to stop the attacks at all. One can only have so much personal security. Walls cannot get any higher. Burglar bars cannot get any thicker and alarm systems cannot get any louder.

I know there will be those peace-mongers out there who will differ from me, but personally I believe that if nobody wants to listen to the Afrikaner’s voice and his peaceful knocking at the door then, it has become time to kick the damn door down. Any action to stop the attacks on defenseless Afrikaner men, women, children and senior citizens should be supported and encouraged. Self-defense is the right of every individual. It is fully justified and nothing to be ashamed of.

It appears as if the powers that be are getting nervous at organized attempts by respectable and educated Nationalist Afrikaners for secession and self determination. These Afrikaner men are not stupid. They know exactly what their rights are as provided for in The United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous people and as provided for under the South African Constitution Article 235; the right to self determination

Vilification and labeling them as “fascist” and “fundamentalist” as opposed to the innocent “philosopher” type of Prof Van Niekerk has already started in Rapport of 17th of July 2011 with them quoting the “poetic”, “academic” and “philosophical”, Breytenbach, Estrehuyse and Van Niekerk.

The media is trying to picture the VVK as “supremacists” as opposed to “separatists”. Doubt it if these gutter gossip reporters who call themselves “journalists” even understands the difference.

The modus operandi is clear. Abel Malan should be imprisoned for as long as possible and be made an example of in a lengthy media show trail for anybody wanting to stand up for Afrikaner Nationalism and self determination. He should be character assassinated and vilified in the media.

Hey, it worked against the Ossewabrandwag, it worked against the KP, HNP and the AWB…why change the tactics now?

When one looks at the physical statures of broad shouldered and intelligent VVK leaders such as well read and educated Ben Geldenhuys and Abel Malan, combined with their upstanding characters, then it is not hard to understand why the powers that be wants to suppress them at all and any costs. These guys are potential Afrikaner national heroes.

The goal is to alienate the VVK and drive the Afrikaners further in the liberal direction, away from secession and self determination.

However, I believe that this time it is not going to work so well. Nothing can suppress Afrikaner Nationalism. It is spontaneous and natural. The stronger one attempts to suppress it the stronger it will come out. It is like trying to hold down a lid on a boiling pot.

While we are preparing ourselves for a lengthy show-trail by the South African liberal media, my hope is that Afrikaners will support Abel Malan and ostracize the likes of Van Niekerk and Breytenbach from their ranks.

16 July 2011

The way things are...In Africa: From the Namibian


By Mike Smith
16th of July 2011

It is not often that one finds a black man willing to be honest with himself. Below is a report from the “The Namibian”. A black man speaking about blacks.

Now if a white person said this…if a White person was honest, it would be classed as “Racism”. Somehow, now that a black person wrote it, it will probably be ignored, especially by white liberals.

There is no way that any honesty, either from whites or blacks alike would ever be taken as honesty by liberals. Anything that differs from their biased, narrow minded, prejudiced beliefs has to be false and wrong.

Liberals are not open-minded for any, let alone new evidence that contradicts or challenges their pre-programmed belief systems. When a cognitive dissonance is caused in their brains by an honest letter like the one below, they simply choose to stick their heads in the sand, pretend it never existed, pretend nobody ever wrote it…and ignore it…hoping it would soon go away.

Problem is that such honesty reminds liberals of their own bias. It points out their own prejudice and dishonesty and it hurts to be reminded of that.


The Way Things Are ...
08.04.2011
Pashu Shuudi

http://www.namibian.com.na/index.php?id=28&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=80198&no_cache=1

ALTHOUGH hard to swallow, us black people despise everything that looks like us. To prove my point, not so long ago fellow blacks who had run away from atrocities in their own African countries were beaten, burned and some even killed by fellow blacks in South Africa.

In Namibia, black supporters of the ruling party Swapo and the opposition parties clashed in 2009 and we still hear of such quarrels or violence just in the name of politics. Through studying history, I have come to learn that we actually disliked one another before colonialism, hence fierce tribal fights during those years. Colonialism united us all in the fight against a common enemy and after colonialism, we saw the rebirth of things we thought were buried a long time ago, like tribalism, regionalism, favouritism, etc.

Although we do not like others from other tribes, we all love things that we do not produce. We love fine branded clothes from Europe, we love American and German-made cars, we love expensive wines and whiskeys, yet no African person brews any of them. All we own, unfortunately, are thousands of shebeens where we drink ourselves to death, stab each other with knives/bottles, infect each other with the HIV virus, make lots of unwanted babies and then blame others for our miseries. We love all sorts of expensive foreign made items and show them off yet we look down at our indigenous products that we fail to commercialise.

As blacks, we know very little about investments, whether in stocks, or in properties. All we know is how to invest our money in things that depreciate or evaporate the fastest like clothes, cars, alcohol and when we are at it, we want the whole world to see us. I know some brothers driving BMWs, yet they sleep on the floors and don’t have beds because nobody will see them anyway.

This is what we love doing and this is the black life, a life of showing off for those who have. A black millionaire tenderpreneur living in Ludwigsdorf or Klein Kuppe in Windhoek will drive to the notorious Eveline Street in Katutura where he will show off his expensive car and look down on others. We sell our natural resources to Europe for processing, and then buy them back in finished products.

What makes us so inferior in our thinking that we only pride ourselves when we have something made by others? What compels us to show off things that we don’t manufacture? Is it the poverty that we allow ourselves to be in? Is it our navigated consciousness, our culture, or just a low self esteem possessing us?

For how long are we going to be consumers or users of things we do not produce? Do we like the easy way out, such that we only use and consume things made by others?

Do designer clothes, expensive wines or changing our names to sound more European make us more confident in ourselves?

Our leaders scream at us how bad the Europeans are yet they steal our public money and hide it in European banks. We know how Europeans ransacked Africa but we are scandalously quiet when our own leaders loot our countries and run with briefcases under their arms full of our riches to Europe. The Europeans took our riches to Europe but our African leaders are doing this too.

Mubarak of Egypt, Gadaffi of Libya, Mobutu Sese Seko of the then Zaire, all had their assets allegedly frozen in Europe. Why do our African leaders who claim to love us run to invest ‘their’ money in Europe?

Again when they get sick they are quick to be flown to Europe for treatment, yet our relatives die in hospital queues. Don’t our leaders trust the health systems they have created for us all? Why are we so subservient, so obedient to corruption when committed by our very own people? Nobody can disagree with me that in this country that we are like pets trained to obey the instructions of their masters.

I am sure we look down when we think of our broken lives but what do we see then? I wonder if we realise how we sell our dreams to our leaders for corruption, misery, poverty, unemployment, underdevelopment and all other social evils affecting us. How long are we going to let our manipulated minds mislead us, from womb to tomb?

Pashu Shuudi