28 June 2011

Were South African Blacks ever Cannibals?

By Mike Smith
28th of June 2011

Ilana Mercer has a new book out. It is called “Into the cannibal’s pot, Lessons for America from post Apartheid South Africa”.

I have not read the book yet, but shortly will.

The title got me thinking...We know of cannibalism in Central and West Africa, but were South African Blacks ever Cannibals? The answer is yes.

It was Felix Dzerzhinsky, known by his nickname “The Red Terror”, founder of the Russian Secret Police, the fore-runner of the KGB who once told a journalist, “Humans are not much more than animals. Starve them enough and they start eating themselves”.

The barbarism and brutality of blacks in South Africa is well known. Who can forget the terrible necklace murders of the 1980’s and the early 1990’s? Who can ignore the Muti murders, thousand of them every year and almost a daily occurrence in South Africa where blacks harvest organs from live people, mostly children to use in witchcraft?

Now I see the necklace murder method is starting to stick out its head again. In the last few days, in Port Elizabeth, four people were killed “necklacing style”. One person had been arrested. Necklacing involves forcing a rubber tyre soaked with petrol over a person’s chest and arms, and setting it on fire. Source Sowetan

Back to history

During the Zulu king, Shaka’s “Defecane” (the great scattering), he wiped out between two and three million blacks in South Africa. That is right, the biggest killers of blacks in South Africa were always and still are, blacks themselves.

In Peter Becker’s book, Hill of destiny: The Life and times of Moshesh, Founder of the Basotho, he tells the story of how the Basotho king Moshoeshoe founded his hilltop kingdom at Thaba Bosiu (Mountain of the night) in what is today known as Lesotho.

The Sothos were fleeing into the hills to get away from the carnage of Shaka. On page 51, Becker explains why Thaba Bosiu was called “The Mountain of the night”, it is because they reached the mountain during the night after a terrible march during which, Moshoeshoe’s uncle, Peete, was captured and eaten by cannibals...

Say, What? South Africa had cannibals who were so hungry that they were attacking armed black soldiers on the march?

I mean, come on...everyone knows that at the time South Africa was still full of wild animals, no shortage of antelope, why eat humans?

Nevertheless, Allister Sparks writes in his book, The mind of South Africa, on page 103 another shocking reference to this cannibalism amongst black South Africans.

Sparks mentions that amongst others, Shaka scattered the four tribes of the Hlubi, the Ngwane, the Ndebele and the Batlokwa, who became tyrants themselves ruling the Highveld of Transvaal, dislodging even more blacks, driving them up and down and criss-cross over the land, plundering and being plundered. Killing and being killed.

“Not a clan was was left untouched, and across the length and breadth of the central plateau, not a single permanent kraal remained. Cultivation ceased and as food ran out many people crazed by famine turned to cannibalism...”

Then in typical liberal excuse for black behaviour, Sparks continues that it was.”...Something totally alien and repugnant to black South African culture.”

Really? Let us investigate...

He then continues, quoting a Hlubi survivor of the time as he was wondering through the land at the time...

“I was wandering on a path. I saw a man who called to me to stop. He came to me and told me to sit down. He caught hold of my skin mantle. I left it in his hand and ran as fast as I could. He was a cannibal and wished to kill me. Afterwards I met two children...one was dead. The living one was eating the flesh of the dead one. I passed on. Next I saw a company of people digging plants. I was afraid of them and hid myself. When I was still going I saw a long stone wall, not very high. There were people sitting there cooking. I saw human heads on the ground. I took another way and escaped from these cannibals.”

And where was the spirit of “Ubuntu” in South Africa back then? Disappeared off the face of the earth I suppose.

So here we are sitting with a conundrum, a cognitive dissonance, several in fact.

A writer like Allister Sparks wants to convince us that these poor blacks...these extremely hungry and starving people only turned to Cannibalism when they ran out of food, but as I have mentioned, they had their pick of wild animals in their millions, even insects and birds, fish in rivers...there was no reason to turn to cannibalism with such an abundance of food, despite them murdering each other in their millions the animal life survived. Even the Boers lived off the land during the Great Trek.

The bushmen of the Kalahari desert managed to survive in much harsher conditions without ever reverting to cannibalism.

But it is the attack on Moshoeshoe’s army and the capture of his uncle by cannibals that should make us think...

If these Cannibals were poor and starving blacks, they would have been frail, thin and weak, probably poorly armed as well. I accept that they might have been desperate and hungry, but where they stupid enough to take on armed, trained soldiers? Were they strong enough to capture a member of the Royal Family, the King’s uncle who was like his own father to him? I doubt it.

These Cannibals were not starving. They were strong and brutish enough to attack an army of 5000 and take prisoners. They simply loved eating human meat the same way as their cousins from the Congo, where they migrated from.

Today we can only wonder what happened to these Cannibal tribes of South Africa. They were absorbed into other tribes, intermarried and had offspring...

The descendants of these Cannibals are today working in your garden, sitting next to you at university...and taking care of your children.

Please support Ilana Mercers Book.

26 June 2011

Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box Part 32. Who does the land belong to?

By Mike Smith
26th of June 2011

I know, I am digressing wildly. With my last chapter I was on the betrayal of the country by F. W. de Klerk and his henchmen.

I should have included this chapter a lot earlier. I assumed that this information to be so well known that it I did not have to include it in my book. I apologize to my readers and followers for veering off on a tangent here.

Nevertheless, the truth has to be spoken and if you bear with me it will shock you.

I normally refrain from giving attention to a self-aggrandizing, nappy-wearing fool such as Julias Malema. I have more important things to write about or do with my life than to spend time on an uncivilized, illiterate, petulant toddler, but this escaped clown from the ANC circus has gotten up the noses of some of my readers and white folk in South Africa with his remarks about nationalization and grabbing white owned farmland in South Africa so I thought it well to settle a few issues by educating him and also those who are worried about his ramblings and verbal bowel movements.

What got my attention is the fact that Dr. Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch moved South Africa up to stage six of the eight stages of Genocide last week after Malema, the leader of the ANC youth league threatened to confiscate white owned farms without compensation. His reason being that whites stole the land from blacks in the first place through colonization and legislation such as the Native Lands Act of 1913. Worse was that a sudden Rush of whites wanted to emigrate because of his claptrap.


Nevertheless, anybody with the elementary knowledge of history, law and politics in South Africa knows that this is utter junk, not even worthy of a second thought, but clearly Malema is preaching to his fellow low-browed, plebian followers who gives him a courtesy-suck every time he masturbates their African victimhood, which is nothing else but an excuse for their self-induced failure and right to milk whites until “Jesus comes”.

I have no problem if someone wants to emigrate because of unfair laws such AA or BEE. I have no problem if anybody feels they can no longer live under a heavily biased socialist government and pay taxes to them. I have no problem with anybody feeling that they need to emigrate because of the government clamping down on freedom of speech and the right to own property. But I do have a problem with someone wanting to run away from a limp-wristed coward and his gang, because when the fight starts I will be there in the front line. I pray for that day. Let us continue…

The Lies

There is a common belief in South Africa that the Natives Land Act of 1913 shoved blacks on reserves (7% of the land) and prohibited them from buying land in white areas. That whites forcibly removed them to these reserves and that these reserves were on the worst land in the country with no mineral riches and that whites kept all the best land and minerals for themselves.

Now if I was a black man, I would probably also want to believe that myth, because it would ensure me eternal victimhood status and compensation for generations to come.

Unfortunately, it is a blatant lie and can be attributed to the lack of reading ability or legal comprehension of the journalists and historians of our time.

First of all the biggest Platinum reserves in the world runs through the former Black homeland of Bophuthatswana. The former Nationalist government had no problem allocating this area to the Tswanas for self rule, although they already had a massive country called Botswana given to them by the British. It was originally part of South Africa, called Bechuanaland. Blacks further got another two massive countries from the British called Lesotho and Swaziland. There goes their 7%.

Lie number two corrected. Black homelands were on the worst land in South Africa.

When one compares the rainfall map of South Africa and anybody with elementary knowledge of South Africa will tell you that the largest part of South Africa is called the Karoo. It is a semi dessert comparable to Arizona or Nevada in the USA. Blacks never even entered this area let alone settle it. Whites made it blossom and created successful sheep farms producing meat of world quality.

Black “Settlements” are found on the north and east coast of South Africa. The East Coast having a sub tropical climate and the north a prairie-like climate with summer rainfall and thunder storms. An exception to this is the Western Cape with a Mediterranean climate and winter rainfall.

The northern and eastern part of South Africa with its beautiful green grasslands and fertile soil is where the blacks eventually coalesced and this is the land they chose for themselves. Their eventual homelands were found on the land they inhabited out of their own free will. The Afrikaners even have a song praising the greenness of Natal, called “ Groen is die land van Natal” ( Green is the land of Natal).It was perfect grazing area for the cattle herding blacks.

Lie number three, Blacks are indigenous to South Africa and first settled it.

Today Blacks in South Africa often tell Afrikaners and other minorities such as the Coloureds, Indians, Chinese or Jews to adapt to their misrule and corruption or “Go Home”…implying that we, who have been born here, who holds legal citizenship through successive birthrights should emigrate to Europe, Malaysia, India or Israel. That the only ones who have a legal claim to South Africa, all of it, are the blacks.

Blacks believe that they are indigenous to South Africa when they are not and this has been proven by DNA research.

We are ALL settlers in South Africa. All South Africans are settlers, regardless of their skin colour, and their DNA carries the proof.

So says Dr Wilmot James, head of the African Genome Project, a distinguished academic, sociologist and, more recently, honorary professor of human genetics at the University of Cape Town.

Apart from a few scattered archeological remains found of black culture in the far northern Transvaal prior to 1652, it is generally agreed that Blacks and Whites were contemporary settlers of South Africa. I use the term “Settler” loosely, because blacks never settled South Africa, their presence was nomadic. Blacks were mere itinerants who traveled from place to place with no fixed home. Whole capital “cities” of grass huts could be moved if grazing was exhausted.

They had no demarcated areas, no fences, no borders, no maps, no title deeds to proof ownership of any land apart from a verbal claim and mutual understanding that their temporary presence in a certain area in a certain period of time constituted “ownership” of the land.

They left behind no foundations of buildings, no statues, no roads, no rock paintings, not a single proof of “settlement” of the land, prior to the Whites settling South Africa. The only rock paintings were made by the Bushmen and the Hottentots (Khoi-Khoi and San) in the caves they temporarily occupied.

Blacks were pastoral-nomads and the Bushmen/Hottentots were hunter-gatherer-nomads. Whites on the other hand built cities, railroads, dams and a first world country comparable to the best in Europe and the new world…their legacy speaks of a people who intended to live there for a thousand years, if not eternity.

To claim that the whole of Africa belongs to Blacks is absurd. It is like an Italian claiming the whole of Europe belongs to Italians, including Norway.

In fact, the pyramids of Egypt is proof of white settlement going back thousands of years, so is that of the Phoenicians settling in Carthage and the Greeks settling in Alexandria. The Arabs settled North Africa soon after the Prophet Mohammed died and the whites settled Southern Africa from 1652 onwards.

Today there are three Africa’s as Dr. Eschel Rhoodie calls it in his book “The Third Africa” (1968)…Arabic up north, Black in the centre and Whites at the south.

The White settlers of the Cape first came face to face with the Bantu around 1770 on the banks of the Great Fish River, 120 years after Van Riebeeck came to the Cape and 1000 km east of Cape Town.

Lie number four, Whites created black reserves and homelands.

The TruthBlacks created the homelands themselves, thanks to Shaka.

The common belief is that the black tribes at the time were all living peacefully and in the spirit of Ubuntu with each other in a virtual liberal paradise. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The Zulu tyrant, Shaka, at the time was committing genocide against other tribes. Wiping out an estimated 2 million people in what is now known as the Defecane (great scattering). The Swazis and the Ndebeles fled back north in the direction of central Africa where they migrated from. The Sotho’s fled into the mountains of what is today, Lesotho. The rest of the smaller tribes huddled together trying to find strength in coalescing.

That is the history of black South Africans that blacks prefer to ignore…that blacks drove other blacks of their land, not whites.


It is into this Maelstrom of black chaos that the Boers trekked in 1838. As far as they went they found large open sections of country uninhabited by anyone.

Black tribes fleeing Shaka’s carnage grouped themselves into areas finding protection in concentrated numbers. This is how Sir Theophilus Shepstone later found them huddled together on self created reserves. He just demarcated it in order to protect them from each other.

The creators of the Bantustans were not the Boers or the Whites, it was a black man called Shaka.


Did Whites simply take over black land? The answer is no. The elaborate answer can be found in a letter written by the congregation of the short lived Boer Republic of Lydenburg in the name of Dominee A, Smith from Uitenhage in 1860 after continuous accusations by the Cape Government and the Dutch Reform Church that the Voortrekkers were stealing black land and not converting the indigenous people to Christianity. It is documented in the book, “Kerkverraad” by François Richter and Dr X on page 98.

The letter was first published on Tuesday, 3rd of April 1860 in “De Oude Emigrant” Potchefstroom.

I will freely translate (and not verbatim) the sections of importance.
Start of quote…

“We are are members of a “Volk” (nation) that is attacked and despised by you today. You attacked our rights and our dignity. We are the people who gave up all our belongings in a search of a country of our own where we can govern ourselves, just like you want to govern yourselves.


You refer to us leaving the Cape Colony as if we wanted to withdraw ourselves from civilization. You accuse us that we do not act as missionaries and force Christianity on a people who do not wishes it upon themselves.


You ask, “Did the Almighty tell our Commandant general to stand up and take ownership of the land?”


Our answer is that the largest area of the current British Colony, Natal and the Free State were legally bought by by the Dutch immigrants from the former legal “Kaffir tribes” (sic) who lived on it. A section was taken over by legally fought wars, wars that were caused by the Natives.


When the Dutch Immigrants found themselves in 1836 landless between the Vet and Vaal River, they bought the land from the natives.


While peace were established with the “Kaffir tribes” surrounding them, Mozilikatze and the Zulus or Matabeles attacked us without warning killing defenseless women and children on land we already bought from them and stole everything they could find.


When Chief Commandant Potgieter arrived back from his trip to Delagoa Bay and saw the murdered families he did what you and I and every other person would have done, he annihilated the enemy.

Under Piet Retief a large section of Natal was bought from the Zulu King, Dingane, who without warning killed 70 men. They then proceeded to kill (at Bloukrans) every white man woman and child they could find.


Under a small group of Kommandant General Pretorius the Zulus were defeated (At Blood River). In 1845 a large section of land in the area of Ohrigstad was bought from the natives and in 1846 they bought another section of land from the “Kaffir King” “Omswaas”.


In 1854 another section of land between the Buffels and Pongola Rivers now Utrecht, was bought from the Panda and a year later they bought another section of land from Omswaas north of the Pongola River.


And with this, the question of how we, the “Despicable Dutchmen”, took ownership of our land is answered”.

End of Quote

The Shocking Truth about the Native Land Act of 1913

Most credible historical sources and journalistic contributions such as Allister Spark’s book, “The mind of South Africa, The story of the rise and fall of Apartheid” selectively omits the truth about the Natives Land Act of 1913. I will now expose and reveal the truth.

This law is often quoted by pseudo historians and liberal propagandists to “prove” how “Whites” in South Africa dispossessed “blacks” of their land.

…until one takes this law under the loop.

From the start when one researches the 1913 Native Land Act one is confronted with several ironies.

The act was brought in by Minister J.W. Sauer, a Cape Liberal and Minister of Native Affairs who opposed disenfranchisement of blacks and was widely considered a friend of the Blacks.

John Tengo Jabavu, a prominent "educated African" and editor since 1876 of the first Xhosa newspaper Isigidimi Sama Xosa ("The Xhosa Messenger") welcomed the Act.

How then can this act today be considered as “The original Apartheid Sin”?
It is largely through the writings of Sol Plaatje.

Despite his Coloured or Dutch sounding name, Solomon Tshekiso Plaatje (1876-1932) was a Tswana. He was a black intellectual and writer who could speak seven languages including Dutch and German and who translated Shakespeare into Tswana. He was editor and part-owner of Koranta ea Becoana (Bechuana Gazette) in Mafikeng, and in Kimberley, Tsala ea Becoana (Bechuana Friend) and Tsala ea Batho (The Friend of the People). Plaatje was the first black South African to write a novel in English – Mhudi, (1919).

In 1914 he wrote a book called, “Native Life in South Africa”, full of anecdotal “evidence” of black dispossession in South Africa. Hardly any real evidence that would stand up in a court of law today.

It is this work that is used by one-eyed academics, liberals and historians to prove their case of how whites dispossessed blacks of their land and the origin of the “Whites-stole-black-land” myth perpetuated by ANC propagandists and more recently by Nobel Laureate for Woodwork and un-distinguished academic, Julias Malema.

Prior to this act, in 1906, the various black tribes complained to the British Government that whites and Indians and other Black tribes, but most importantly Companies, bought land on their reserves and fearing this encroachment, they rioted.

Because of this, a young black lawyer educated at Oxford and Columbia Universities, named Pixley Seme called various African Chiefs together and started in 1912, the African National Congress or the ANC.

The government of the day appointed a commission to investigate the situation, called the Lagden Commission. It is on the recommendations of this commission that the Native Lands Act of 1913 was founded.

The original Act…The Native Lands Act of 1913 can be viewed Here. Please download it before it disappears down the Orwellian “memory hole”.

It starts off with, “To make further provision as to the purchase and leasing of Land by Natives and other Persons in the several parts of the Union and for other purposes in connection with the ownership and occupation of Land by Natives and other Persons.”


At the time, the word “Native” was probably used for Blacks and “Other Persons” probably referred to Whites, Indians, Coloureds, etc, but that is pure speculation. The act says…quite clearly… “native" shall mean any person, male or female, who is a member of an aboriginal race or tribe of Africa”.

By that definition, Afrikaners definitely qualify, seeing that the group, their language and their culture originated in South Africa.

Where English settlers always held on to their European roots, Afrikaners cut their ties to Europe. They even named themselves and their language after the continent.

The law further distinguishes native companies…

“…and shall further include any company or other body of persons, corporate or unincorporate, if the persons who have a controlling interest therein are natives”…


That means any company founded on South African soil by Afrikaners or any other natives, including banks or mines could buy land from each other.

Nowhere in this Law does it specifically refer to Blacks and Whites. Nowhere does it say that Blacks could not buy White land or vice versa.

It then carries on and says,
“1. (1) From and after the commencement of this Act, land outside the scheduled native areas shall, until Parliament, acting upon the report of the commission appointed under this Act, shall have made other provision, be subjected to the following provisions, that is to say: --
Except with the approval of the Governor-General --

a. a native shall not enter into any agreement or transaction for the purchase, hire, or other acquisition from a person other than a native, of any such land or of any right thereto, interest therein, or servitude thereover; and

b. a person other than a native shall not enter into any agreement or transaction for the purchase, hire, or other acquisition from a native of any such land or of any right thereto, interest therein, or servitude thereover. “

Here one has to understand already that the law, just like all Apartheid laws, use to cut both ways. It was perfectly fair.

Further that the law never specifically referred to Whites or Blacks. It only refers to “Natives” and “A person other than a native”.

Not only could “other persons” not buy “Native Land”, but also that, “Natives” could not buy “Other Person’s” land…

As I have said. The act was 100% fair.

But right in the beginning it says, “Except with the approval of the Governor-General…”

That means that there was an escape clause. The law stipulates that Black tribes could still buy white land subject to evaluation of a committee and the approval of the Governor General… And boy did the blacks buy land…

Recently a study has been made by two distinguished academics, Professors Feinberg and Horn, that totally blows this theory about black land dispossession by whites apart. It is called:

SOUTH AFRICAN TERRITORIAL SEGREGATION: NEW DATA ON AFRICAN FARM PURCHASES, 1913–1936

I suggest you download this data from the PDF link provided for future reference before it disappears off the internet and down the memory hole.

* Harvey Feinberg is Professor Emeritus of History, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, and Research Collaborator, Department of History, University of Pretoria.

* André Horn is Associate Professor of Geography, University of Pretoria.

A reference to this study can also be found at the following link, written by a black journalist called Jacob Dlamini of Bussiness Day, Was Natives Land Act SA’s original political sin?

This study proves that contrary to common belief, the 1913 Lands Act resulted in MORE land for blacks not LESS. The act resulted in Blacks increasing their land ownership by 65%. This is conveniently ignored and omitted from contemporary history.

It proves that at the time Black tribes were farming right next to Whites. It proves that whites were renting land from blacks and vice versa.

Sometimes Whites and Blacks were farming on the same land in total symbioses without interference from government, taking care of each other and their shared livestock. Liberal journalist Allister Sparks also acknowledges this in his book, “The Mind of South Africa”.

The study by Feinberg and Horn further proves that the Nationalist government of Barry Hertzog allotted far more white land to blacks than the liberal government of Louis Botha and Jan Smuts. Today, it is believed that the Nationalists brought nothing constructive to South Africa. The Nationalists are vilified to kingdom come by journalists and historians alike. The truth is rather different.

Quoting from Dlamini’s article…

“Between 1913 and 1936, for example, Africans bought about 3200 farms and lots outside of native areas. What’s more, the 1913 act was not retroactive, meaning that Africans who already owned land outside of the native reserves could not have it taken away from them. Feinberg and Horn say that between 1913 and 1924, under the governments of Louis Botha and Jan Smuts, there were 302 exemptions granted, amounting to 35% of the total. Between 1924 and 1936, when JB Hertzog was in power, there were 565 exemptions granted, amounting to 65% of the total. “

In effect what happened is that blacks could congregate into a group and call themselves a tribe, appoint a “headman” and thus buy white land on a “willing buyer willing seller basis”. Was this legal? Was it ethical? Was it mafia-like conspiracy to steal and encroach on White land? Who stole the land from whom…or was there no stealing whatsoever?

It is this age old system of “Willing buyer; Willing seller” created by whites and black South Africans themselves that the ANC and Julias Malema want to do away with today. The ANC wants to steal all the land.

It is this interference with the lives of the citizens of the country that we have a problem with; black and white alike. The further the ANC or any government for that matter stays away from us the better. We will solve our own problems.

That includes the United Nations, The Common Wealth and The African Union. Stuff them all. We South Africans will find the solutions to our own problems.

What this study proves, is that White South Africans especially Afrikaners and Blacks, sorted out their issues with each other decades ago. They were enemies; they fought bitter wars against each other.

Then they became friends. They lived and farmed side by side with each other, respecting each other. They came to common agreements of “Live and let live” and “Each to his own”…until the internationalist and their Communist agitators with their self interest and view on self enrichment by stealing the mineral wealth from all South Africans played the one off against the other.

South Africa is at the moment at a crossroads. There is the rough road and there is the smooth road.

We as the reasonable whites and blacks of South Africa can choose to co-exist with each other as we have done for the last four hundred years and as we have decided in 1994 or we can choose to go to war with each other.

Fact is that the Afrikaners can take a lot, but sooner or later they also reach the “Gatvol” stage. Sooner or later even the strongest ox gets tired.

When the Afrikaners are fed-up, they have never backed down when it comes to a fight for their existence and their place in the sun… and they have always produced a good account of themselves.

Whether it was the Mighty Zulu Empire at Blood River, the Mighty British Empire in the Anglo-Boer War or the Mighty Communist Empire in Angola…one thing is for sure, you do not scratch the balls of a sleeping lion with a thorny twig. When he wakes, do not beg for mercy.

Fact is that, when all the historical facts, truths and lies have been laid bare in front of reasonable people, it still means nothing. The ANC do not even hold themselves by their own Freedom Charter that says “South Africa belongs to all who live in it, black and white.” Or that “The rights of the people shall be the same, regardless of race, colour or sex”…

The ANC today practices unequal laws of Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment, quotas in university entrance and sport…How in God’s name do they expect us to take them seriously when they preach “Equality” but practices Inequality?

In the study of revolution, Crane Briton was a master who wrote the book “Anatomy of a Revolution”. He analyzed the various stages of revolution based on various case studies. All revolutions passes through these stages from the “Old Order” to a “Moderate Regime” to a “Radical regime”, to “Thermidorian reaction” which is a reaction to the brutality and the excesses of the revolution.

In the light of the current ANC acknowledged “National Democratic Revolution” I will leave it up to the reader to decide in which faze we are in.

Crane Briton says in his book that it is the “Great Haters”, the single-minded men of heroic emotions, who eventually rides revolutions to their successful conclusions.

It is the focused minds of young tigers who are not distracted from their ultimate goal, who are willing to kill en masse, who are willing to risk their lives and who are willing to die for their cause who will eventually rule the land. Fortunately we are not that far yet, but we are close...

When the Blacks sing, “Hamba kahleUmkhonto”...


Go, go well, Umkhonto,
Umkhonto, Umkhonto we Sizwe.
We,we the people of Umkhonto,
Are ready to kill the Boers...


Are they talking reconciliation? Are they willing to work towards a commonly shared country by all South Africans? I do not think so.

When Jacob Zuma sings “Bring me my machine gun” does he intend to use that machine gun on Blacks? Obviously not. When Julias Malema regurgitate the words of Peter Mokaba and sings “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer” and millions of blacks laud him...what do they think goes through the minds of the young Afrikaners?

I can tell Malema what the Afrikaners think and how they behave.

The ANC is shit scared of the right wing Afrikaners, the AWB...they see them as their greatest threat. They are wrong.

Let me tell you how it goes at an Afrikaner social gathering or braai.

Obviously there are the Rightwing fanatics who want to shoot everything and who want to blow up everything to do with the ANC and "Kaffirs”.

They are the ones who wants to take it to the streets in mass action and want to Toi-Toi ala Kaffir and go and demonstrate in front of the Union Buildings with pickets in their hands.

Then there are the “New Liberal Afrikaners” who make up the biggest part of the Afrikaners today. These are the youngsters and housewives brainwashed by liberal bullshit radio and tellevision who praise Mandela as a demi-god and who believe in the “Rainbow Nation Bullshit...and who listens to Jack Parrow and “Die Antwoord”....They are zeros on a contract.

Then right at the back you will see a quiet “Old Ballie” who does not say a word. In fact he only listens and looks somewhat bored, yawning and checking out his finger nails. When prompted for an opinion he dislodges an old liberal Greek philosophical quote that no-one has heard of or can comprehend before reverting back to his quiet observing state... reservedly smiling at the audience, drinking in their ignorance and stupidity.

This is the man the ANC should actually be scared of, because he is an “Old Liberal”...one who has been around the block and knows that bullshit baffles brains. What goes on in his mind, nobody knows and he won’t share with anybody else. He is the man who slowly and quietly chips away at the block and if needs be has a lifetime of education and experience to make a decisive difference when the time comes.

He is the one who knows that survival of the species do not rest on a few Recce Special forces who can survive for two weeks on eating grasshoppers and Mopani worms. He is the one who knows that survival does not depend on success in a few glorious battles such as Blood River, Majuba, Spioen-Kop or the Lomba river...No.

He is the one who knows that survival takes a long term view. A view of a chess player thinking eight moves ahead all the time...A vision of seeing your nation in fifty years from now...two hundred years from now.

In ancient Rome, when a glorious General returned from battle, The Romans had a massive parade down the main street. The General would ride in on a chariot to the thunderous applause of the citizens...to his side would be a subject, whispering in his ear...”You are only human, You are only human...”

Certain people in the ANC have forgotten that they are only human. That the same people who have put them into power can take that power away at the drop of a hat.

Many years ago I watched the sitcom, “The Cosby-show” where Dr. Huxtable’s son gave him uphill. In the end he lost it and told his son, “Remember that I gave you life, I brought you into this world and that I can take it away”.

This is the lesson Julias Malema and the ANC still needs to learn.

But when all is said and done, “Might is right”...Africa taught us that lesson. Shaka did not care about political debates or philosophy.

Alexander the Great might have listened on occasion to Aristotle of Stagira, but when it came to the crunch, Alexander was the first man over the wall of an enemy city thrusting a blade between the ribs of an enemy soldier while the philosophers were pondering back home about the existence of life.

Whether it was Genghis Khan, Attila the Hun, Julius Caesar, Napoleon or Shaka...the ones who eventually conquer the land are the ones who are willing to take it by force. Holding on to that land for a thousand years is the realm of the philosophers and the warrior poets.

At the moment things are really hotting up in South Africa. All the whites have a feeling of the time is near now. The situation is almost unbearable at the moment...like a cyst waiting to explode, whites are bracing themselves for the onslaught to come. Whatever Malema hoped his rhetoric would achieve is having the counter effect. Whites are uniting like never before. They are finally starting to recognize a common enemy.

For his sake I hope he has the will and dedication to pull through what he wants to start, this time it will be all or nothing, there will be no half measures. No mercy.

Julias Malema last week made his offer quite clear when he put it on the table. Here is our offer. Go for it! We stop at the equator. Do with it what you want, Julias.

24 June 2011

The Reitz-Four show-trial and hiding the true Racism of SA


By Mike Smith
24th of June 2011

We all know that the much hailed and liberal constitution of South Africa means nothing to the ANC. It is only a piece of paper and lip service. They do not respect the freedom of information clause, because they have a moratorium on crime statistics.

They do not respect property rights, because they want to nationalize mines and confiscate white people’s farms and houses. They also do not respect the right to self determination, seeing that they have continuously denied the Afrikaners that right, apart from the Potemkin village of Orania.

The right to language, mother tongue education and cultural association and freedom of association in general is also constantly being undermined due to the Anglicization of schools and universities and forced integration by the state.

Two years ago the University of the Freestate embarked on a similar forced integration of student hostels. They set targets of 30% integration for all hostels, which meant black hostels had to have 30% white students and white hostels had to have at least 30% black students.

Ironically the black students protested the most. Eight black first-year students had been sent to live with the 128 white male students at the Reitz hostel. About 400 black students went on a rampage and trashed the campus, throwing stones, setting fire to buildings and vehicles and assaulting police. Ten students were arrested.

Four white students decided to make a comical protest. They settled on making a tongue in the cheek amateur spoof movie about how the hostel would be like after forced integration and if the blacks would be worthy residents after passing the traditional Reitz initiation ritual.

They needed some black actors so they asked the cleaning and kitchen staff, four ladies and a man, who worked at their hostel if they would like to star in this movie. Reward would be a bottle of whiskey.

The students were on very good terms with the staff, always joking and having fun with each other. The five agreed to make the movie. The “script” was based on the second year initiation ceremony of the hostel.

Usually, the second year students would stand naked and had to eat or drink a "disgusting mixture" as part of the "fear factor" section of the initiation.

The mixture contained water, bread, coffee, protein powder, raw garlic and milk -- the impression would be created that someone had urinated into it, but it never happens. An orange cooldrink is squirted from a bottle into it.

For the movie however, the workers were all fully clothed. The former students said the plaintiff's in the matter were explicitly told not to swallow the mixture, but to "play-act" the vomiting, not to smile and act seriously during the scene. The former students said during the making of the video the atmosphere between the plaintiffs and them was friendly and light-hearted. One of four women in the video, Laukaziemma Koko, told the British Sunday Times "When they filmed us… they were laughing so hard there were tears in their eyes,"

The workers took part freely and voluntary and could have withdrawn from the activities at any time because they knew they were acting. A bottle of whiskey was also handed to the women as payment for the work done, as agreed.

One of the students who filmed it proudly gave a copy to his girlfriend. He obviously did not see anything wrong with it and considered it some harmless student fun. They subsequently broke up, and in an act of revenge, she posted the video on YouTube and Facebook. Within 24 hours, riots had broken out on campus and the police were called in to quell the unrest.

Two of the students were expelled and the other two had already finished their studies. The rector was replaced by a Coloured Man, Prof. Jonathan Jansen. Criminal proceedings followed. The media and the ANC were lining up for a public lynching, wringing their grubby paws for the show trial that lay ahead.

The media immediately dubbed them the “Reitz-four” similar to the terrorists known as “The Cradock Four”.

One of the workers, Rebecca Adams, said she used to be "invisible" until the video was leaked to the media.

"After it came out politicians wanted to speak to me. I met the rector for the first time. We were given tea in his office. My family was hounded by the South African media."

The four students were found guilty of crimen injuria, fined excessive amounts, given six months suspended sentences, vilified, character assasinated and crucified in the media. Humiliated on camera, in the newspapers, in court and at public meetings. They were forced to apologize to the five workers, to apologize to the University, to apologize to white South Africans, to apologize to black South Africans, etc, etc, etc…

A reconciliation ceremony was held, where more racist intestines were pulled out. The ceremony took place in the old Centenary Hall with tables set in five long rows in front of a stage with an SA flag stick. The black and white table settings were rounded off with five huge silver candle stands.

At the ceremony, the former students and the workers were shown eating together on video, made to read prepared statements, but the media were barred from interviewing them.

A small traditional cleansing ceremony was also held after they read statements which followed a period of hugging, back slapping and congratulations between the students, guests and the workers.

The hard done by workers each received a million Rand as “compensation” for playing along in this farce. The university built a Human Rights centre and the five former workers would not be cleaners anymore, but paid human rights activists at the centre.

Yestreday, however the appeal case of the four students were successful. Their suspended prison sentences were completely dropped and their fines halved.

The judge said that he was convinced that everything was simply an act. He said that the “humiliation” and “affect on their dignity” were not as big as people perceived and nobody was really hurt…except the four white students of course. Don’t expect the media to put this on their front pages now....or to mention that the ones who started the entire mess were the ANC and the University with their bullshit forced integration policies.

http://www.beeld.com/Suid-Afrika/Nuus/Reitz-4-se-vonnis-verminder-20110623


Let us put this into perspective.

In South Africa a murder takes place every 26 minutes. This is more than 20,000 a year. More than 200,000 in the last ten years. In the same period, more than 8000 farm attacks perpetrated by blacks on white farmers and their families happened. More than 1500 white farmers have been brutally tortured and killed by blacks. This excludes the wives and children of these farmers who have also been raped, tortured and killed.

A woman or child is raped every 26 seconds in South Africa, more than 1,2 million a year or twelve million in ten years.

In the last two years alone, 30,000 cars were high-jacked and more than 350,000 burglaries took place.

91% of all these crimes are committed by blacks.

Blacks further ruin the economy by not paying for services. Municipalities are billions in arrears and it is expected of whites to carry these costs.

Consider further that there are monthly about 10,000 bankruptcies, 90,000 court orders and 142,000 summonses, then you start to realize how whites are suffering under racist black misrule.

50% of white farmers cannot economically survive anymore due to high labour costs from the minimum wage laws. Since 1990 five million jobs have been lost. Only 5% of matriculants find work whilst the ANC fat-cats on the gravy train steal billions from the taxpayers.

The most shocking statistics of it all is that 95% of all blacks at Barragwanath hospital are HIV positive. More than 500,000 blacks die every year due to the direct AIDS policies of the ANC regime…

…But the media chooses to make a show-trial out of four White Afrikaner students.

23 June 2011

A troll speaks. What Blacks really feel towards White South Africans



By Mike Smith
23d of June 2011

Every now and again, a houtkop-troll sticks out its ugly peppercorn head on this site. I do not mind, because it gives us an insight into the mindset of blacks and how genocidally, racist they actually are. The past few days one has appeared on this thread…Sharpeville revisited: The Avocado tree at Cato Manor

I have taken his nonsensical drivel complete with atrocious spelling and analyzed it for him…

1. “We are demanding that you go to your homeland. GO HOME WHITEY!.”

Define Whitey and Homeland. Are you suggesting Europe is our homeland? What about the Jews. Should they all go back to Israel? There are several problems with this argument. Seeing that Afrikaners have only South African Citizenship and speak a language indigenous to South Africa, they cannot simply get European citizenship. In fact it is almost impossible to get into Europe for a white South African unless the person is highly qualified or has lots of money. Even so, they and their prospective employers have to prove that no European can be found to do the job. Afrikaners are not Europeans. They do not speak Dutch, French or German. They were born in South Africa and are legally South African citizens. To deny them their birthright is a criminal offence, punishable by the International Court of Justice. Besides their ancestors have been in SA for 400 years. Probably longer than yours. So tell me…who the fuck are you to deny me my citizenship? It is the same as me telling you and all black South Africans to learn Ki-Swahili and move back to Uganda and Rwanda, because that is where your ancestors came from.

2. “Redicule mugabe all you like but truth be told, all of africa agree with what he did maybe not how he did it.”

I am so glad that you admit that all blacks admire the likes of Mugabe who is a genocidal mass murderer who has actually killed more blacks than he has killed whites. He wiped out 20,000 Matabeles in the 1980’s. Many more of his own black countrymen are starving to death and are living in abject poverty, ten times worse than any colonialism or Apartheid…and you admire him? You are truly a sick psychopath.

3. “You can't say we didn't try to make this country work for us all,”

I can say what I want. What did you blacks ever contribute to South Africa apart from a source of cheap labour, that a machine could have done ten times better? Everything you wear. Every watch, cloth or button comes from the whites.

4. “we tried willing buyer willing seller,”

Have you ever read the book by Dr Du Toit, The Great SA Land Scandal? http://greatsalandscandal.blogspot.com/

It is available for free online. Intimidating farmers off their land, killing thousands of them, raping their wives and shooting their children is called “willing buyer, willing seller” in your eyes?

5. “we tried free market economy”.

Is that what you call racist policies of BEE and Affirmative Action?

6. “But know that if you try anything stupid we will crush you.”

Be my guest. Go for it!

7. “We will make this country work for us now.”

Good luck with that!

8. “No more 70% unemployment in black youths.”

Is that how bad the ANC has managed so far? Is that how they create jobs as they have promised you? So how do you intend to cut this high unemployment rate? Take away all the jobs of the whites? At least under Apartheid blacks never experienced this level of joblessness.


9. “No more landless africans.”

Who is an African? Only Blacks? What about the Arabs up north?


10. “We tried to get you to atleast like us but all we got was hate.”

What is there to like about Blacks? Disgusting cultural practices such as Uketwala? Intonjane? Ukeshwama? Muti Murders? Buying wives with cows as in Labola? Beliefs in ancestor spirits and Tokoloshes? Hate? No. We do not hate you, we just do not want anything to do with you. We tried Apartheid to separate you from us. It did not work. Guess what we are going to try next.

11. “We are nw returning the favor demanding that you go to your homeland.”

Again, where is that homeland? Our homeland is South Africa. It is our only motherland.

12. “i've come to realise i have nothing in common with most white people.”

Exactly. Now you know why we had Apartheid.


13. “You have no ties with africa, and you are not and never will be african.”

No ties? We were born here. Our language was born here as well as our culture was born here. We fought for this country in two world wars and in two wars of independence as well as the border war against the communists. All our ancestors were born here and died here. We have built this country up with our money and expertise. We have built cities and infrastructure as if we want to live here for a thousand years. What have you or your ancestors built or contributed in SA? Grass and mud huts. You want us to leave? Who is going to compensate us for everything we have built? Do you think you can just take? Steal? No my friend. You have to PAY us for every school, every hospital, every dam, airport, railroad, harbor, etc. that we built with our money. Do you want us to send you a bill?

14. “Guys lets face it we tried this rainbow nation shit and it didn't work and twas all your fault.”

Yes, as usual whitey is to blame for everything. You never tried the Rainbow nation. You just want to kick out everyone that is not African. Everyone that is not black. What about the Indians of Natal? Do you want them to go back to India? What about the Cape Malays? Should they go back to Malaya or Indonesia? And the Jews…should they go back to Israel?

15. “Its time you got the f out. “

Ditto. Go back to Uganda and Rwanda where your ancestors migrated from into South Africa.


16. “It doesnt make sense to be still experiancing white racism in 2011.”

So why do we have to put up with your black racism?


17. “Do this willingly while we are still showing mercy.”

So you threaten us to get out…or you will commit genocide on us like in Rwanda?

18. “Those that wish to stay must b willing to xcept us as their equals and countryman.”

You are the one who said we will never be African so how the hell do you expect us to ever be equals?

Conclusion.
 You, pal, are the biggest racist and genocidal maniac that ever trolled my website, and you have the audacity to accuse whites of being racists? You are the one who wants to kill and chase out anyone who is not black. There is no difference between you and Mugabe. There is no difference between you and that other genocidal maniac, Idi Amin who killed and chased out tens of thousands of Indians from Uganda.

You scream and cry about the tragic death of 69 blacks amongst 15,000 who attacked Sharpeville police station. What about the 1500 white farmers that has been killed by blacks since 1994? What about their wives and children that were killed that brings the figure to almost 4000 white farm murders by racist blacks? Even worse…what about the 500,000 blacks who die every year due to the direct AIDS policies of the ANC and them deny its citizens anti-retroviral drugs? The ANC has killed more blacks than all the rightwing organizations and all Apartheid security forces ever did or ever can. If you want to look at where your problem lays, then look no further than your beloved ANC.

21 June 2011

Mail & Guardian broadsides the Cape Party

By Mike Smith
21st of June 2011


I had to chuckle when I saw this vitriolic attack on the Cape Party by the editor of the Mail & Guardian (online).

Chris Roper seems to hate this insignificant and small party so much that he spent a good few hours writing and editing his petulant tirade against it and Capetonians in general.

He basically insults them as dumb blondes, racists, trash, wine quaffers and if that is not enough, and when he started to run out of insults he launched into absurdities such as “Vespa-riding and Sushi-eating” people and then jumping on the illegal bandwagon claiming that it is constitutionally illegal for the Western Cape to secede as the Cape Party suggests. Article 235 in the constitution actually makes provision for self determination.

Why does this little party, who has done nothing to him personally and who simply practice their democratic right under the South African constitution, get him so hot under the collar? Why is he so intolerant towards them?

If it really is such a “constitutional illegality”, then why not just ignore the little Cape Party? Why get so upset? It is because Mr. Roper and some other ANC people know that it is in fact possible to secede and are shitting themselves, that they get so worked up.

Now if the Cape is as Racist as Mr. Roper suggests, “…about how racist Cape Town is. Of course it's racist, people, it's in South Africa!“…then why the hell does he make it his home? Why do “Plenty of Black people” also make it their home if it is so utterly racist?

I would like to remind Mr. Roper of the freedom he has under the current SA constitution. He and the “Plenty of Black people” are welcome to move out of “Racist” Cape Town any time they want to. There is nothing holding them in the Cape. Nobody forces them to stay. They should rather go and live in the Eastern Cape where the ANC has an 80% majority.

Please free us from the Cape Party
CHRIS ROPER: LOOKING-GLASS WARS - Jun 17 2011 00:00

http://mg.co.za/article/2011-06-17-please-free-us-from-the-cape-party/
There are many unofficial mantras by which South Africans live. "It's only a crime if someone else is doing it" is the most important one to remember. I've got used to people driving while holding their cellphones to their ears.

But I'll never get used to them breaking off their conversations to flash a finger out the window and shout, indignantly: "Look at that stupid bitch driving while talking on her cellphone!"

So the Cape Party, with its quixotic attempt to have the Western Cape secede from South Africa, operates in a fine tradition of civic blindness -- because it's constitutionally illegal, of course. Snide Jo'burgers will point out that the Cape has already seceded from the rest of the country, what with its "one blonde, one vote" policy and its insistence that Eurotrash be added as a 12th official language. So why not make it official?

In fact, why not go even further and actually separate the Western Cape from the African landmass and sail it away to anchor just off France, where the climate is good for growing wine and sneering at customers in restaurants? Well, because only a small part of the Cape fits the stereotype of so-called white, so-called coloured, racist, wine-quaffing Democratic Alliance voters.

There are plenty of black people there too, although the myth being put about is that they are bused in by the DA because you need black people for racism to thrive.

Hout Bay (a small, damp suburb outside Cape Town, also home to horses) famously formed a republic and did a brisk trade in official fake passports. But that was the cutely deranged action of a ¬lunatic fringe, many of whom had buckskin jackets with actual fringes. The Cape Party is something else.

As a fourth-generation or so Capetonian I'm pissed off at the provision of yet more ammunition to the bleating, self-righteous Jo'burgers in the city I now call home, people whose moral high ground appears to be that they'll ¬condescend to take money from any race on earth, whereas in the Cape we only fleece Europeans and white folk. Alas, the Cape Party is the embarrassment that proves their rule.

Its party slogan actually seems to be "Free the Cape" -- from the yoke of constitutional democracy, one assumes. It's tough enough being forced to field accusations from Jo'burgers (no other city seems to care) about how racist Cape Town is. Of course it's racist, people, it's in South Africa! But now I look at the Cape Party and I despair.

I'm not suggesting that it is necessarily racist. I'm sure the new "Cape nation" will allow people from any race in, provided they pass a citizenship test that includes eating sushi while riding a Vespa in the wind. But it is blindingly pretentious and makes it easy to accuse certain types of Capetonians of not thinking of themselves as South African, and certainly not as African.

Chris Roper is the editor of M&G Online. Follow him on Twitter @chrisroperza

They think it is over...

By Mike Smith
21st of June 2011

Newspaper sellers in the county of Lancashire, circa 1902...at the end of The Anglo Boer War.


In the Boer War, for the first time in a war conducted by a major European power, the British used concentration camps, starvation and disease as the crucial weapons to subdue the enemy. These atrocities were directed by Sir Alfred Milner, a Rothschild agent who had founded the Round Tables [...].The stakes were high; the Rothschilds needed the enormous capital represented by the gold and diamond riches of South Africa to finance their final drive for world power.

— Eustace Mullins; The Curse of Canaan









Oor die Kakies wat lag,
'n handjie van ons teen 'n hele groot mag
en die kranse lê hier teen ons rug,
hulle dink dis verby.

Maar die hart van 'n Boer lê dieper en wyer, hulle gaan dit nog sien.
Op 'n perd kom hy aan, die Leeu van die Wes Transvaal.

Want my vrou en my kind lê in 'n kamp en vergaan,
en die Kakies se murg loop oor 'n nasie wat weer op sal staan.

19 June 2011

The Unholy Roots of the Boer/Afrikaner Religion called Calvinism

By Mike Smith
19th of June 2011

Anybody who has grown up in the strict Calvinist doctrine of the N.G. Kerk or any of its sister churches knows that this is one religion where one does not question. One should simply “believe as a child”.

One quickly realises that non-conformance and questioning quickly gets one branded as an “Unbelieving Thomas” and one runs the risk of being excommunicated or put under censure.

In hindsight I think I would have ended on the pyre...many times, because there is simply no way any right-thinking, sane person can believe the nonsense a reformed minister or dominee preaches from the pulpits Sunday after Sunday.

There are however many things that the Dominee never tells his flock... (I love the reference to sheep, because that is exactly what they are)...

Today it is quite well known that Christianity is mostly based on pagan Hellenistic or sun religions. Everything from Easter (Babylonian goddess Ishtar) and Christmas (the soul of Babylonian Nimrod in the pine tree) to Valentine’s Day and Sunday as the day of worship is pagan in origin. Even the story of Jesus being a saviour God, being born from a virgin, the three kings or wise men that brought him gifts, walking on water, healing the sick, etc. is in many other religions that predate Jesus by hundreds or even thousands of years .

But that will not be the focus of my article.


I want to focus my article on the man who started the brand of Christianity that was such and is such an intricate part of the Afrikaner today. In English his name is John Calvin.

John Calvin is known in Dutch as Johannes Calvyn, but in fact he was born Jean Cauvin in 1509 in France. His parents were Crypto-Jews whose real surname was Cohen.

The secret order of B’nai B’rith acknowledged this as exposed in the Catholic Gazette of February 1936. 1st Source , 2nd Source .

“ We can boast of being the Creators of the REFORMATION! Calvin was one of our Children; he was of Jewish descent, and was entrusted by Jewish authority and encouraged with Jewish finance to draft his scheme in the Reformation.”

Crypto Judaism is the practice of secretly adhering to Judaism, while publicly professing to be of another faith. The practice arose during the time of the Inquisition and the expulsion of Jews from Spain in 1492. In South Africa the Oppenheimers are also Crypto Jews. Crypto-Jews had to change their religion as well as their surnames publicly in order to escape persecution in Europe.

At this stage it is also important to know something about Jewish surnames. Jews traditionally do not have surnames like Christians have. They use patronymics, such as David ben (son of) Joseph or Miriam bat (daughter of) Aaron.

Most of the German Jewish sounding surnames such as Goldstein, Rozenberg, Wiesental, etc comes from an Austro-Hungarian decree in the 19th century that forced Jews to put down a German surname.

There are however three exceptions to this rule and that are the surnames of Cohen, Levi and Israel.

Cohen comes from “Kohein” which means “Priest” in Hebrew and and refers to patrilineal descendants of Aaron, brother of Moses and the Priest of the Israelites. Therefore Cohen is the Priestly line.

Levi or Levy refers to the tribe of Levi and the Levites had certain special duties in the temple.

And what is with Israel? Jewish thought divides Jews into three groups: Kohein, Levy and Israel. Israel basically means the rest of us.

John Calvin was appropriately from this most respected priestly line, a Cohen. Outwardly he would be a devout Catholic. He did not study religion. Instead at university he studied Latin, Greek and Philosophy until his father enrolled him for a law degree at the University of Orleans in France. While he was a student there, at the age of 21 after coming into contact with “Humanism” he broke from the Catholic Church and at the age of 23 he got his license to practice law.

Therefore it has to be reiterated that Calvin was not a trained priest…he was a trained humanist lawyer.


More or less at the same time as Calvin was born, another Crypto-Jew was born in Spain, by the name of Michael Servetus. His mother was Jewish and his father part of Spanish nobility.

Servetus was a genius. By the age of fourteen he was fluent in Spanish, Latin, Hebrew and Greek and later also learned Arabic.

Michael Servetus was a polymath. He studied everything from law, geography, meteorology, astronomy, pharmacology, medicine and theology. He eventually became a brilliant physician and was the first European who described the pulmonary circulation (the heart pumping blood through the lungs, etc).

At the age of 17 he was a student in law at the Toulouse University in France and it was during this time that he read the Bible in its original languages for the first time…despite the family being outwardly Catholic.

He discovered that the Trinity of God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit is a cooked up fairy tale from The Council of Nicaea where the bishops of the Roman Empire disagreed so much about whether Jesus was equal to God that eventually they voted on it. That is right. Jesus was voted in as God at the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD.

Michael Servetus further stressed that nowhere in the Bible is there any support nor any explanation for this belief in a “Trinity of Gods”. He believed that the origin of it lays in Roman and Greek mythology where the Cerberus is a three-headed dog-monster god who guards the underworld.

Servetus wrote several books explaining his beliefs and the problem with the belief in a Trinity. He also disagreed with the baptism of babies and said they should be baptised as grown-ups.

It is important to know that Servetus was not an atheist. He thoroughly believed in God and in Jesus Christ. He just did not believe that Jesus was God and chose to call Jesus “The son of the eternal God” as opposed to “The eternal son of God”. He wanted people to return to the original form of Christianity.

During this time in 1536 John Calvin published his masterwork on his religious thought called “The institutes of Christian religion” in Geneva where he practiced as a preacher along with his friend and fellow fanatical reformer William Farel.

After drawing up a confession of faith and demanding that the people of Geneva sign in, the city council drove Calvin and Farel out. Calvin then went to minister in Strasbourg, but in 1541 the Geneva Council invited him back and offered him the position of Master of Geneva.

It was not long before the small framed, thin and sickly John Calvin became a tyrant who severely oppressed the citizens of Geneva.

The citizens were reprimanded and punished if they did not address him as “Master”.

He introduced the system of elders and deacons and lay preachers who became a virtual secret police known as the “Consistory”.

Geneva became the “Protestant Rome” and John Calvin its “Pope”. He established a virtual dictatorship. Through his spiritual police, the “Consistory”, he took personal control of the lives of every citizen. In his doctrine, every man was a wretched being not worthy of existence, a sinner and evil doer, trash (une odure). Households were subjected to periodic inspections and anything that smacked of pleasure, music, song, playing cards, theatre, even skating was declared bawdiness and severely punished. People were also subjected to forced church attendance.

Calvin managed to destroy the normal bonds between people. His method of intimidation and terror and his system of the populace spying on each other was so refined that it involved the control of every petty activity.

This is the stuff that Erich Mielke, Stasi Chief could only dream of. I am sure the Stasi later copied some of these techniques of Calvin. Can you imagine how Geneva would have been if John Calvin had the technology of the East Germans?

It is amazing to see that this system of oppression is still practiced in the Reformed congregations of South Africa.

Nevertheless it was during this reign of terror that Michael Servetus and John Calvin started writing letters to each other. Servetus eventually wrote about 30 letters to Calvin criticising his beliefs and stating his own.

It was soon clear that Servetus was far more intelligent than Calvin and Calvin hated it. He did not like the idea that his authority and divine right to rule was being challenged by someone hurling invectives at him. So he stopped writing to Servetus after about a year.

Servetus then published another provocative book, namely “The Restitution of Christianity” and sent a copy of it to John Calvin.

Calvin responded by sending Servetus a copy of his own book’s latest edition. “The Institutes of Christian Religion”.

Servetus sent him the book back, spelling mistakes corrected and heavily annotated with arguments pointing to errors in the book. This was the final straw for Calvin. He saw it as a personal attack on him and started plotting his revenge on Servetus.

When Servetus mentioned that he would come to Geneva if Calvin agreed, Calvin wrote a letter to Farel on 13 February 1547 noting that if Servetus were to come, he would not assure him safe conduct: "for if he came, as far as my authority goes, I would not let him leave alive."

Calvin then asked the Inquisition in France to arrest Servetus, which they did, but Servetus escaped after three days and wanted to flee to Italy, but had to go via Geneva.

Geneva at the time had severe sabbatical laws and on Sunday 13th of August 1553 fearing persecution if he did not go, Michael Servetus attended one of Calvin’s sermons. The Spanish doctor was recognized and arrested on the charge of being an escaped prisoner.

For the next 75 days Michael Servetus would be kept in a dungeon and subjected to torture and severe interrogation. His inquisitors were appalled at his Anabaptist believes and his denial of the Trinity.

Servetus was entitled to a lawyer, and he requested one, but he was denied it on the argument that he was a lawyer himself and intelligent enough to conduct his own defence.

According to the Codex of Justinian that was drawn up under Roman Catholic rule during the sixth century, Michael Servetus was found guilty of heresy for denying the trinity and infant baptism and sentenced to death by burning at the stake. This was amazing seeing that the Geneva Reformers abolished all the Catholic Canons but found Servetus guilty on Catholic laws.

Nevertheless his execution was implemented only a few hours after his conviction. Calvin offered him hanging instead of burning if he uttered the words, “Jesus Christ, the eternal Son of God”. Servetus remained steadfast and refused.

Servetus was executed on the Plateau of Champel outside of Geneva on 27th October 1553.

To make his death longer and more painful, his stake was prepared with live, green, oak wood that still had green leaves attached to it. On his head they placed a straw crown dipped in sulphur. He was seated on a log with his body chained to a post. On his lap they placed a copy of his book and a pile of his books were placed to the side of him.

With a huge crowd looking on, the executioner lit a torch and ignited the pyre of green wood underneath the convicted heretic. The flames quickly engulfed his emaciated body and Servetus uttered the words, “Jesus, son of the Eternal God, have mercy upon me”. For a while he still uttered shrieks and groans...it took half an hour for him to die. He was 42 years old.

John Calvin remained unrepentant for the rest of his life, often defending his actions to execute Michael Servetus.

In five years, 1542-46, Geneva, with 16,000 inhabitants, had fifty-seven executions (including 34 women accused of witchcraft and spreading plague) and seventy-six banishments. All these sentences were sanctioned by John Calvin.

This is the man who is hailed by the Boers/Afrikaners of the NG Kerk, the Hervormde Kerk and the Gereformeerde Kerk as a hero and father of the reformation, let alone the father of their church.

Calvin was an egotistical, narcissistic tyrant. He was a sadistic psychopath.

If you saw someone burn a cat slowly to death, what would you think of him? Would you take spiritual lessons from such a person? John Calvin did this to a fellow human being...several in fact, yet people think he is a hero today. The mind truly boggles.

This information is freely available, but Dominees keep it from their flock. If the sheeple must know the truth about their founding fathers, they will desert like one man. The church is already running empty as it is and I cannot say that I feel any sympathy.

It was from the start a heresy and founded on nonsense totally contradicting the Bible...the thoughts of one psycopathic mad-man. The Reformed Churches were instrumental in handing the country of South Africa over to Marxist terrorist scum and every time a member of the congregation is raped, tortured and murdered by the forces of Satan, the church is quiet. Not a peep from them.

From the pulpits they keep their flocks enslaved and tethered. Sundays they preach forgiveness, turning the other cheek and loving your enemies, while they offer their children to Moloch.

If we want freedom for our people, then we have to throw off the shackles that enslave us and abandon the heretical humanistic crap being served to us on a silver platter and covered with honey.

http://servetustheevangelical.com/doc/ServetusFromBook.pdf

16 June 2011

Sharpeville revisited: The Avocado tree at Cato Manor

I wrote this a year ago, but seeing that it is youth day today and everyone will fork out the picture of Hector Peterson let us revisit the truth about Sharpeville...and the Avacado tree...



By Mike Smith
17th April 2010

About a month ago on the 21st of March, the autumn equinox in the Southern Hemisphere, the Communist in South Africa celebrated their 50th anniversary of their Satanic Passover namely the “massacre” at Sharpeville. Few people today know what really happened that day, how the Communist offered 69 Blacks to Satan and what preceded the events.

Sharpeville 1960 is held up today as the single biggest “massacre” of blacks by whites during the years of Apartheid. The truth about Sharpeville is actually quite well known for anybody who wants to do the research.

Basically about 15,000 Blacks armed with guns, pipes and machetes (pangas) marched on a police station manned by about 300 policemen to “Peacefully” demonstrate against the law of having to carry a passport when visiting or working in South Africa. The march was organised by the Pan African Congress Communist Robert Sobukwe, who in typical cowardly communist fashion used women and children to do his dirty work while he was sitting in a pub in an adjacent town during the events.
About fifty policemen, mostly rookies, one of which were in the service for only a month, went outside to meet the crowd. The police officers were given strict orders not to shoot, but nervousness set in and one policeman dropped his weapon and a shot went off. All hell broke loose and the police started firing.

69 Blacks died. The official reports states that many were shot in the back. But the journalism have to be brought into question because the bodies photographed had EXIT wounds on their backs where the most blood is shown.

Shot in the front, small entry, person runs away and collapses on his stomach, bloody exit wound on his back is photographed by BBC journalists and claim that he was shot in the back... you get the picture.

If the police really wanted to commit a “massacre”, they would have shot wildly into the crowd, emptied their magazines and thousands of Blacks would have been killed. The fact that only 69 were killed was a testimony to the discipline and restraint exercised by the policemen.



The Sunday night and the Monday morning preceding the “Massacre” the police drove the Blacks back with batons and tear gas, but they still kept coming, at about 13h35 on the Sunday they broke through the gates and their aim was to kill every policeman inside the police station.

But what gave the Blacks this courage and confidence to march on a police station and kill everyone inside was an horrific incident that took place about two months before that at Cato Manor.

It was a Saturday, 25th of January 1960...

A large amount of blacks came to have a family reunion and were getting pissed out of their brackets at a local “Shebeen”, an illegal drinking spot in Cato Manor, Durban.

Standard police practice was to set off a 12 man patrol in certain areas and then pick them up with their captives later on.

On the watch of a Sergeant Winterboer, he set off a 12 man patrol and arranged to pick them up at later at the premises of a firm called “Benoni Nr 1”.
The leader of the patrol was a constable Joubert. The police arrested a man and suddenly was surrounded by a mob of drunken Blacks who demanded the release of the prisoner. Under the circumstances it would probably have been the best thing to do, but Constable Joubert, who has been a policeman for only 18 months, underestimated the danger.

The black women started cheering on their drunken males with their traditional high pitched tongue noises.

Constable Joubert’s answer was, “Only over my dead body will I let this prisoner go”.
At this point a Black policeman stepped on the foot of a Black woman who started crying and screaming hysterically. Within a few minutes the police patrol was surrounded by a mob of drunken Blacks armed with Knobkerries and Machetes coming from every surrounding shack and shouting, “Kill the Boers!, Kill the Boers!”. Under a hail of rocks the policemen tried to make their way back to the premises of “Benoni Nr1” where they hoped sergeant Winterboer would be waiting for them, but the Blacks barricaded their retreat.

At this time Sergeant Winterboer arrived at the scene, but instead of using his rifle, paniced and ran back to the police station to call on reinforcement.
While he was gone, the stone throwing increased on the police patrol and Constable Joubert made his way to a nearby Avocado tree, attempting to climb it and escape the machete wielding mob.

Joubert was pulled down and the mob of machete wielding Blacks hacked him to pieces. Two White policemen called Kriel and Rademan and a Black policeman called Dludla also tried to escape the mob. Kriel fought with his bare fists and ran almost a kilometre before he was also hacked to pieces. Rademan heard the cries of his comrade and returned to help and was also hacked to pieces. The Black policeman Dludla tried to Help Rademan and he also was hacked to pieces.

The body of another White policeman Gert Rheeder was later retrieved from under a heap of rocks and loaded onto a police truck. When it arrived back at the police station, Police Major, Jerry van der Merwe officially saluted the slain Policeman, at which point an Indian policeman saw the finger of the “corpse” move, his head and his body was reduced to such a bloody mess that his own parents could not even recognise him.

Rheeder, survived, but remained for the rest of his life a useless psychological wreck.

“So what about the Avocado tree that Joubert tried to climb?” you ask...
Well, about a month later...Nine Blacks bought a case of beer at the local Shebeen and parked off under the exact same tree and started drinking, when out of nowhere a lightning bolt hit the tree an killed all nine blacks underneath...

Coincidence?...An act of God?....you be the judge.

Source: “Verrat an Südafrika”, Klaus D Vaque Copyright 1988, Varama Publishers, ISBN 0-620-12978-6, pg 172-175.

15 June 2011

Irvin Khoza, the ANC and the Tinkerbell effect


By Mike Smith
15th of June 2011


In J.M. Barrie’s 1904 play, “Peter Pan”, the fairy Tinkerbell is an Ill tempered, spoiled jealous and vindictive little pixie who likes to fix pots and pans that aren’t broken. She speaks a language that sounds like the tinkling of bells and that is only understandable to those familiar with the language of the fairies.


Tinkerbell is always trailed by a bit of fairy dust or pixie dust and this dust can help humans fly if they believe in happy thoughts.


In the play, Tinkerbell almost dies after she intentionally drinks poison as to prevent Peter Pan from drinking it, but she is revived by the belief of the audience (usually children) clapping hands, because fairies only exist if humans believe realy, realy, hard in them…


Along comes Irvin Khoza Chairman of the 2010 FIFA World Cup Organising Committee of South Africa and, speaking in typical ANC Tinkerbell language, makes a passionate plea to South Africans not to leave the country.


It follows several extremely talented sports stars who have recently decided to leave South African shores for greener partures overseas due to racial quotas disqualifying them from the top positions in their respective sports and lesser qualified, Affirmative Action players being chosen in their places.


Khoza said, “The country has been experiencing an exodus of skilled people like doctors and social workers, who have found jobs in other countries.”


"This country is the most discounted country in the world, yet most beautiful. To South Africans, please don't leave this country ... don't abandon it for prosperity because you will be harshly judged," Khoza said. "This is a paradise, it's like heaven."


And so invites the audience to start clapping and revive Tinkerbell…


There is no doubt that South Africa is a beautiful country, but with all the stealing, raping and murder it is hardly a paradise or heaven. Well maybe if you are a top member of the ANC it is…or if you understand ANC Tinkerbell language and believe really, really hard, then the Rainbow Neverland might seem like a paradise to you.


As far as I am concerned, Irvin Khoza is away with the fairies. If he wants skilled South Africans to stay, his beloved ANC will have to stop stealing. Stop corruption, sort out the crime, scrap BEE, AA and start governing properly.


In another demonstration of the Tinkerbell effect , The ANC asked the public for help to fix the country

First the ANC stuffs the country up, by trying to fix the pots and pans that are not broken and then when they drink their own poison and start dying, they ask the audience (you and I) to clap really, really, hard and believe in La-La-Never-Rainbow-Nation-Land, because only if we really, really believe it is paradise, will it be…


I say, “Reality check: Stop clapping, let them die, the play is over, head for the EXIT signs”.


If they are so damn good, they would not have stuffed up SA in the first place. Now they can fix it themselves. They should stop calling “The Baas” to come sort out their problems.

Comic relief: 2012 Mandela dies...

In 1945, Adolf Hilter died and went to Hell. Satan asked, "why are you in Hell?" He replied, "I am responsible for the massacre of millions" Satan said, "well done, sit to the right of my throne."

In 1953, Joseph Stalin died and went to Hell. Satan asked, "why are you in Hell?" He replied "I killed millions to stay in power" Satan said "good, sit to my left".

2012, Mandela finally dies and goes to Hell, Satan says, "This cannot be true, You are a Saint, Mr. Mandela, why are YOU in Hell?"

Mandela replies, "Bitch, get the fuck off my throne!"



Meet the REAL Mandela