31 May 2011

When Afrikaners get Fed-up and say, “Enough is enough!”



By Mike Smith
31st of May 2011

Below is a heart-warming story of an Afrikaner man, Jaap (Jac) van Tonder who simply have had enough of these criminal bastards in South Africa.

When he and his wife returned from the bank, a gang of black robbers pushed a gun against his wife’s Mari van Tonder’s head. Van Tonder pulled out his own weapon and shot the piece of trash in the chest. The bastard then fled and got into their getaway car, a Mercedes, with van Tonder pursuing and shooting. Van Tonder wounded several.

The gang fled, firing from their car at van Tonder who continued the pursuit. The cowardly bastards then crashed into a student’s car and high-jacked the car of another white woman.

Van Tonder’s attitude is summed up in his own words:

“I was not going to let these thugs kill my wife or me or get away with our money. I was so angry. I was determined to do everything in my power to stop these guys, I just grabbed my gun and started shooting. I shot until I had nothing left to shoot at. I’d just had enough. It was as simple as that…“

Yes…It takes a while to get fed-up. Afrikaners can tolerate a lot of bullshit such as the singing of, “Kill the Boer: Kill the Farmer!”…but there comes a time when a man just says, “Enough is enough…”

Van Tonder is a hero. In the old South Africa he probably would have received the Wolraad Woltemade Medal for extreme bravery. What a beautiful example he has set for the rest of us. Best of all is that no charges will be pressed against him.

This is it people. Our walls cannot get any higher. Our burglar bars cannot get any thicker. Our alarm systems cannot get any better…If we want to survive, then we have to fight back. Forget what the peace-mongers say.

The Afrikaners are heavily outnumbered in a hostile environment and surrounded by heavily armed black thugs who constantly attack them…who wants to take their lives …who want to rape their wives and daughters…I want to ask you one thing, “What would you do...?”
 You can read the report here, Fed-up resident outguns thugs

30 May 2011

Who paid Terre’blanche ‘s killers and their lawyer?



By Mike Smith
30th of May 2011

Last year the Far Right-wing leader Eugene Terre’blanche was cowardly killed by two blacks while he was asleep in his bed. They brutally chopped him up with machetes (pangas) and were arrested a short while later after they called the police and basically told them, “OK, come and fetch us. The job has been done. Mission Accomplished.”

The ANC at the time condemned the murder and called for calm amid fears of racial tension exploding.

Since then, the state allocated one of the men a lawyer called, Puna Moroko. Then stepped in top lawyer and senior advocate Norman Arendse, who at one stage was the boss of Cricket SA and offered his help to Moroko…pro bono…which means, I defend you now, you pay me later.

He claimed in an e-mail to have had the full backing of the ANC. ANC spokesman Jackson Mthembu admitted that he discussed the matter with Arendse and gave him the go-ahead, but said Arendse approached him, not the other way around.

It could be that Arendse simply wanted a slice of the pie, as this case would obviously drag on for years and every lawyer and his dog would want to make money out of this.

Arendse's e-mail further stated that for "obvious political reasons" the ANC did not want to become involved in the matter directly. "There is no question of them funding the matter. In so far as there may be funding from some or other source, it will not come from them," the e-mail stated.

It seems as if the ANC, whilst publicly condemning the killing of Terre’blanche, secretely appointed a third party lawyer to defend the killers of Terre’blanche.

This is not a new strategy. Amongst drug smuggling gangsters on the Cape flats, it is quite common that the street dealers and small fish work for the Big Boss at an obvious risk, but if they do get caught, the Big Boss will pay their bail and their lawyer.

With the ANC being nothing but a criminal gang themselves, I am not surprised that they employ the same strategy with their own “small fry”.

Whether the ANC ordered the killing of Terre’blanche or even paid his killers, one can only speculate on. Hopefully it will come out in the trial.

What is of major concern to me is the message that they are sending out with this case of a top lawyer defending the killers…Basically what they are saying is this…

“Go ahead, kill those racist White Boers, you have our full backing…chop them up with pangas while they are asleep… and when you get caught, don’t worry, we will put our best lawyers up to defend you. Nothing will happen to you.”

The ANC now denies their involvement in this case

27 May 2011

Playboy fake coloured girl's skin colour

By Mike Smith

27th of May 2011

Not so long ago I reported the incident where Elle Magazine published a picture of Bollywood actress, Aishwarya Rai on their front cover and the actress’s skin was lightened. Here is the original article



The latest skin lightening scandal has befallen a Cape Coloured TV presenter from South Africa,. Crystal Arnold who made it to the cover of Playboy magazine

I have written about the obsession of Cape Coloured women who want to be white on several occasions. Kroes hare wil geblow wees and Affie Kaap Af

In the case of Crystal Arnold, it seems that Playboy did some other magic too. They airbrushed out her “Gunsakke”…you know, those hips that looks like she has saddlebags…



Don’t get me wrong. Uncle Cracker loves curvy women. I always say that if I wanted a woman with a body that looks like a 12 year old boy, I would have dated a 12 year old boy. No, thank God there are still some real woman in this world.

Nevertheless. If one looks at the pictures of Crystal Arnold on her website If one looks at the pictures of Crystal Arnold on her website , then one can see how she really looks like. Racist Playboy has come along and made her skinnier and whiter and her hair blonde. Why bother? Why not just put a picture of a real white woman on the cover? Why a picture of a fake coloured woman, with a fake skin tone, fake straight, blonde hair, etc?

We have the Real McCoy in South Africa…several in fact…Just think of Rosalind Jacobs, the squeeze of golfer Charl Schwartzel. Now THAT would be something for the cover of Playboy. Wouldn’t you agree?

24 May 2011

The Post Election Post Mortem


By Mike Smith
24th of May 2011

I am observing the ANC after the election and they remind me of a fighter floored by a sucker punch coming too… still punching around them, but only hitting air asking, “Who done it? Who waz it?”…

Make no mistake. The ANC is very self critical. They will go and sit down and dissect the 2011 elections and note down exactly where they went wrong and most importantly who where the ones who dared to vote against them.
Marxist terrorist do not take kindly to anyone with a different opinion or anybody pulling in the opposite direction. They are only interested in democracy if THEY can win.

We have seen this strategy in South Africa during the 1980’s and the early 1990’s when the ANC necklaced their slightest opponents into line with tyres, petrol and matches.

They are already starting to compile a list of who those bastards were who dared to vote against them, and be assured the Coloureds and the Indians are on the list, but right at the top of the list are those “White Dogs” who all united in the camp of the DA…Leading in the vindictive backlash of the ANC was another farm attack in the Freestate today

The ANC is bitter, but they only have themselves to blame. Their strategy was to “not change what worked for us in the Struggle” namely playing the race card. The ANC did not reckon with the fact that times have changed and they did not adjust their strategy accordingly.

People are seeing through their racial rhetoric and they are realizing that the biggest racists in South Africa are none other than the ANC…most notably their talking heads of Manyi, Malema, Mantasshe and Zuma.
Now if the ANC adopted a strategy leaning more towards the Rainbow Nation bollocks of Mandela they would not have alienated so many people as they have. They might even have had White Liberal idiots supporting them, but no…they knew better.

In the run up to the May 2011 elections the ANC’s own negativism and racism was played to boredom through their mouthpieces of Malema, Manyi and Mantashe and it all backfired on them. South Africans of all races are sick and tired of it by now. They were more interested in the positivism of the DA.

I have mentioned this before, but will say it again…

Politics is a funny game. It is not only about getting more of your own people to vote for you…it is not only about getting more of the opposition to vote for you…but most importantly it is also about getting the opposition to stop voting for themselves.

In this battle, the DA was supreme. They succeeded in getting the white opposition of the Freedom Front Minus to vote for them, but they also succeeded in making the black opposition stop voting for the ANC. Since 1994 this must have been the biggest black stay-away vote till date.

The ANC is worried. After naming their mayors for Gauteng, Gwede Mantashe, shortly afterward at a media briefing at the party headquarters, expressed concern over the decline in support among minorities. He conceded that there were communities who would be “switched off” by comments which “appeared racist” made by ANC leaders, but added that South Africans remained “too over-sensitive to each other”. Source.

Basically he admitted that the ANC’s racist strategy has backfired on them. They have been outsmarted by better chess players. Or shall I put it in the words of blogger extraordinaire “Spengler” (David Goldman)…

The ANC played Chess whilst the DA was playing Monopoly

The outcome of the 2011 local elections was that the whites, the coloureds and the indians and all other minorities have united against the ANC albeit under a liberal banner. The DA should build on this. They should be proud of this and if they want to defeat the ANC in 2014 they should listen to voices whispering in their ears.

Let the ANC carry on with their racist bullshit of Affirmative Action and BEE and see how far it gets them. Not even a donkey bumps its head twice against the same stone, but in the case of the ANC I am afraid that some people always insists on learning the hard way. If this is what their intentions are, then I am sorry to say that the ANC will lose the next election. South Africans are “Gatvol” of these racist politics perpetuated by the ANC.

23 May 2011

The 2011 Local Elections in South Africa. My analysis

By Mike Smith
23rd of May 2011

The local elections are over the votes have been counted; The DA is rejoicing, the ANC is licking its wounds and the Freedom Front Minus…well the poor Freedom Front Minus…As they say in Afrikaans, “Poer in sy Moer”.

My heart has not bled for the Afrikaners like this since Frank Bruno dropped Gerrie “Seer Handjies” Coetzee in the first round at Wembley in 1986…Pynlik.

Like a punch drunk boxer coming round from a serious concussion, the FF minus will probably ask, “Huh? What hêppend?”

All I can say is, “Stay down boet, relax…you will be alright.”
I will tell you what happened to the FF minus.

On the 10th of May 2009, ANC and South African President Jacob Zuma announced the appointment of Pieter Mulder, leader of the now defunct, FF minus, as the Deputy Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.
“Traitor!”, We all called in chorus. “He went for the money”, we said.

“ No”, Mulder protested and tried to convince us that his was a strategic “Master plan”… from the inside he could do a lot more for the Afrikaners. Was he right? What did Dr. Mulder have up his sleeve?

It is all about priorities. Do you want to squabble over “Liberal” and “Conservative” or do you want to unite the whites? Do we want to fight the Anglo-Boer War amongst ourselves again 110 years later or is it high time for us whites to realize that we have a common enemy and that we need to unite?

Uniting White South Africans has always been a dream of politicians. Trying to get them to stand together against a common enemy seemed like an impossible dream.

Mulder has succeeded where others have failed. What Mulder has achieved, Smuts, Malan and Van Zyl Slabbert only dreamt about. When he joined the ANC government of Jacob Zuma, he united the whites in South Africa. Like one man almost they all went and voted for the DA. Even if it meant that Mulder would have to commit political Hara-kiri himself.

Expecting the Whites, Coloureds and the Indians to find common ground under a Conservative banner was probably too rich to ask, so they united under a Liberal banner. Is this the “Master Plan” Mulder had in mind? It worked brilliantly.

The coloureds and the Indians joined in. Amichand Rajbansi and Eerwaarde Hendrikse would be so proud. Isn’t that what we all spoke about for many years? Wouldn’t it be nice if the Whites, Coloureds and Indian minorities could unite against the ANC? Well now they have.

See, that is what it should be like. Find unity first. Destroy the enemy and then sort out our squabbles later.

Maybe I am just giving Mulder some undue credit. Maybe I just feel sorry for him. Maybe I want to believe that somewhere in that superfluous, treacherous carcass of his hides a man of integrity.

But while it seems like the two sisters of Cape Town, Helen and Patricia have finally found each other, I am sure the ANC will for a while burn the midnight oil to figure out where they have stuffed up.

It is simple. People simply do not fall for their idiotic racial rhetoric anymore. The ANC thought that in the light of their pathetic performance as a government for the last 17 years, their corruption and mismanagement could be covered up by once again playing the race card. It has worked so well for so long and never change what works…right?

Jimmy Manyi, Julias Malema, Gwede Mantashe and Jacob Zuma all deserve prizes for uniting the whites and other minorities against them.

The ANC thought, they could once again divide and conquer, but South Africans have come a long way. If Jimmy Manyi thought that he would get the vote of coloureds after telling them there are too many of them in their own backyard, then he was seriously mistaken.

They drove the Whites, other minorities and 6% of blacks all in the Kraal of the DA…whether that was a preparation for the final slaughter will have to be seen, but at last it seems like we are united now.

As much as I despise liberalism and socialism, I have to go with the top priority first, the lesser of two evils; unifying the whites and other minorities against the ANC.

Ideology amongst us can be sorted out later once the ANC and their washed out 1950’s Marxist ideologies are on the rubbish dump of political parties of South Africa.

I do however feel that the Hegelian dialectic of Thesis and anti-Thesis to find Synthesis should be maintained. Seeing that all the people against the ANC are currently uniting on the left of the Political spectrum, I do feel that there is a vacuum on the right.

I think the time is right now to launch a Conservative Party. I do not mean another lightweight, somehow moderate, Conservative Party like we had with the FF-. I mean a genuine Conservative Party made up from heavyweight Conservative intellectuals, not necessarily all white either, but Conservatives from the White, Coloured, Black and Indian Communities.

The problem that the DA sits with is that unless a plan is made very quickly to counter the emigration from South Africa, they might lose their entire support base and the same as what happened to the FF- will happen to them.

So how long can the DA keep this liberal façade when their support base is in their hearts actually conservatives? I think the pressure will start to mount now inside the DA to start opposing AA and BEE. The youngsters are feeling the pinch and the DA will have to do something. The DA will have to slowly move to the right.

The DA is already counting their 2014 chickens long before they are hatched. The reality is that the support base of the DA is emigrating and finding jobs overseas. Their votes in 2011 were probably last ditch attempts to get the DA to do something about the unbearable AA and BEE.

The Whites and other minorities have voted for the DA, because they have expectations, and they will make those expectations clear to the DA very soon. Those expectations are about their continued survival in South Africa which is in jeopardy due to AA and BEE.

Unless the DA addresses these issues, their support base will keep on trickling out of South Africa whilst the ANC support base will keep on trickling in from Zimbabwe and Mozambique. Unless the DA does something about AA and BEE, I cannot see them sustain their 2011 success in 2014. There simply won’t be any whites left to vote for them.

The educated whites and other minorities will keep on voting with their feet, and that is the only vote that ever counts for the continued survival of White South Africans.

21 May 2011

Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box – Part 31- De Klerk’s liberal conversion and the mindset of treason

By Mike Smith
21st of May 2011

So far we have seen that many authors describe F.W de Klerk as once being one of the most conservative in the NP government. What is it that changed him? How does one man, bordering on the extreme right wing in his party change to become one of the most liberal and hand the country over to Black Marxist terrorists? Did the change come out of his own accord or was he forced to change?

We have seen that there are several reasons why people become traitors or cross over to the other side. The main reasons are represented by the acronym M.I.C.E… Money, Ideology, Coercion and Ego or any combination of the above.

Of these the most often one is the Ego. Traitors are criminals of the worst kind and something that criminals all share is their own greed and the belief that they will never be caught out. They are narcissists who believe they are somehow special.

What was it that moved F.W. de Klerk to become one of the worst traitors of his people to date? Was it one of the above or all of the above…or was it a specific combination?

In this chapter I will explore whether F.W. de Klerk fulfilled the criteria to be called a traitor. I will not follow the letters of M.I.C.E. in the proper order but in the order of what I believe was the importance. I will start with…

The “I” for Ideology
 Several authors as well as F.W. de Klerk’s own brother Wimpie de Klerk and F.W de Klerk himself, states that F.W. never really experienced a Damascus conversion moment. With him it was a slow, gradual change. This is not entirely true. F.W. de Klerk did have a Damascus moment…well sort of…

De Klerk used to go on holiday during the time of the run-up to his speech on the 2nd of February 1990 and sit at the beach teeming out over the water doing a huge amount of introspection and reflection.

At this stage it is necessary to explore the ideology of F.W. de Klerk at the time. When we say he was conservative or religious, then we need to define HOW conservative and HOW religious he actually was. For that, we need to digress slightly and explore the general beliefs and religious convictions of the Afrikaners in South Africa.

For the most part Afrikaners are staunch protestant people. Since the arrival of the first Dutch farmers at the Cape of Good Hope in 1652, they brought their Dutch Reformed Church (Nederduits Gereformeerde Kerk) NGK and Calvinistic religion with them. Highly educated ministers or “Dominees” were imported from the Netherlands. NG Kerk dominees study theology for seven years at university.

By 1834 when the Great Trek started on the Eastern Frontier in what is today the Eastern Cape, the Dutch Reformed Church (NGK) was one of the mightiest organizations at the Cape and opposed to the Great Trek.

The Farmers who trekked and who later started their own Republics namely the ZAR (Transvaal) and the Orange Free State therefore started a new Church independent from the Dutch Reform Church or NGK. This church is known today as the “Hervormde Kerk” or “Reconstituted Church”. The Hervormde Kerk (HK) also imported their own Dominees from the Netherlands.

At the time there was a debate going on in the Netherlands on whether hymns should be sung in church together with Psalms or only Psalms. The argument was, “In God’s Church, only God’s word”.

The argument was that, hymns were sometimes of unknown and therefore dubious origins and could have been inspired by Satan who urged a drunk to write a hymn in his drunken state. Actually they found that some of the hymns were in contradiction to the Calvinistic teachings, the Canons of Dort and the Belgic Confession.

A dominee called Dirk Postma arrived in the Boer Republic of the ZAR to take up service in the Hervormde Kerk, but upon hearing that he might have to sing Hymns in church, he broke away with 15 members and a short while later started a new Ultra Conservative church called the Gereformeerde Kerk or (GK) and enrolled 300 members.

So at this stage there were three of these Dutch Reformed Churches. The Nederduits Gereformeerde Kerk (NGK) of the Cape, The Hervormde Church (HK) of the Transvaal and the Gereformeerde Kerk (GK), the Boer Church.


One of the founding fathers of the GK church was Boer President Paul Kruger himself. Together with his15 founder brothers and 300 new members they founded the GK under a seringboom in Rustenburg in 1859.

Paul Kruger was a deeply religious man. He also believed that the earth was flat and claimed that he only ever read one book in his life and that was the Bible. He said that he did not need any other books. He knew most of the Bible off by heart.(Maritin Meredith Diamonds, Gold and War. (New York:PublicAffairs),pg 76.)

The GK or “Dopper” Chruch is still known today as the “Boer Church”.

Why is the GK church known as the “Doppers”? The word comes from the Dutch name for a small bowl. When one places such a small bowl on someone’s head and shave off all the protruding hear, one ends up with a peculiar conservative and puritan hairstyle of the time.

The Doppers calls the DRC or Nederduits Gereformeerde Kerk (NGK) members, “Gatjieponders”…the word comes from “Gat-Jappon” which literally translates to “Arse-coat” referring to the tuxedo style coats they used to wear 200 years ago. But I am digressing…

Nevertheless, all three churches NGK, HK and GK are sister churches and the dogma basically the same, i.e. Calvinistic. The only difference is basically the singing of hymns in church. The GK only sings Psalms and what is called “Skrifberymings”, text out of the Bible rewritten to rhyme and given melodies.

Another difference is the belief of the Ultra Conservative “Dopper” Church that God personally intervenes in the lives of people and that when one prays long and hard enough, God will show one the way…show one which course to take. They believe that one can get a calling from God. In Afrikaans it is called a “Roeping”.

F.W. De Klerk was, and still is, such an Ultra Conservative Christian…a “Dopper”, a member of the Boer Church. F.W. de Klerk comes from a thoroughbred Boer family.


During his time of intense introspection, F.W. de Klerk also searched for such a sign from God, to show him the way, a calling to do something great. The sign eventually came in the form of his personal friend and Dopper Dominee, Pieter Bingle of Cape Town.

De Klerk, his wife Marike and Pieter Bingle knew each other since their student days at the Potchefstroom University. Pieter Bingle was at the wedding of his son and testified in the murder trial following the murder of former First Lady Marike de Klerk. Pieter Bingle and F.W. De Klerk are also members of the same Afrikanerbond lodge (afdeling) , Leeuwenhof in Cape Town.

At the inauguration of F.W. de Klerk as State President, Dominee Pieter Bingle gave a sermon…His text was from Jeremiah 23 verse 16 and 22.

Jeremiah 23: 16…

Thus says the LORD of hosts:
“ Do not listen to the words of the prophets who prophesy to you.
They make you worthless;
They speak a vision of their own heart,
Not from the mouth of the LORD.


 Verse 22:..

“But if they had stood in My counsel, And had caused My people to hear My words, Then they would have turned them from their evil way And from the evil of their doings.”

Basically, Dominee Pieter Bingle told F.W. De Klerk to stop listening to the people and his advisers who were all “false prophets”. He told De Klerk that he was standing in the Council Chamber of the Lord; that he was an instrument of God.

He told De Klerk that he who stands in the Council Chamber of the Lord will be aggressive enough to tackle problems and challenges fearlessly.

Pieter Bingle said…

“New ways will have to be found where roads enter culs de sac, or are worn out or cannot carry the heavy traffic. Excess baggage will be cast aside. Certain will stay and others will have to be discarded. Those stuck in the grooves of the past will find that besides the spelling, depth is the only difference between a groove and a grave.”

During the sermon, Pastor Bingle said, "Mr. de Klerk, as our new President, God is calling you to do his will. Today God calls you to serve as the President of South Africa. God's commission is not to serve as the President of some of the people, but as the President of all the people of South Africa."

F.W. De Klerk was deeply moved by Pieter Bingle’s sermon. He was literally in tears. At a post inaugural meeting he told his friends and families that they should pray for him while the tears were flowing down his cheeks. He said that God called him to do a specific task…to save South Africa…To save all the people of South Africa.

He said that he knew he would be rejected by his own people, but that he had to walk this road and that his friends and family should help him. He confessed that God had called him and that he could not ignore the call.

De Klerk the narcissist felt himself special…singled out by God Almighty to do this job…to commit the ultimate treason against his people.

About his convictions, Allister Sparks quotes De Klerk in “Tomorrow is another Country”, page 100.

“I also believe that God directs things here on earth, and as a result I had to accept that my election as president was something HE wanted to happen, and therefore in my relationship-my vertical relationship- I have a direct responsibility and I must try to live according to that.”

From that day on, De Klerk knew what to do. God told him to hand over the country to a gang of Marxist terrorists.

We will see later how “God” directed De Klerk…but let’s continue on our journey through betrayal.

Whilst De Klerk enjoyed his Damascus moment…On the other side of the parliamentary benches, the Conservative party felt different. These people were also Christians who believed God told them to oppose De Klerk’s decisions such as Dr. Andries Treurnicht who was a Dutch Reform minister for 14 years himself and later became leader of the Conservative Party, the opposition of the National party.

But why was F.W. de Klerk in doubt to start off with? What cognitive dissonances were playing off in his mind at the time of his Bingle induced Damascus moment?

Well, several things played a role. For that we need to go back to the mid 1980’s and the discussions between people at grill parties (Braais) a favorite past time of South Africans. We have to backtrack into the fears and doubts of the people of the time.

In 1985 president P.W. Botha scrapped the Mixed Marriages Act and the Immorality Act which outlawed interracial marriage and interracial sex.

Since 1983 P.W. Botha split the Afrikaners down the middle with the HNP and CP on the right and the NP and the PFP on the left. The PFP was run by a liberal Afrikaner called Dr. Van Zyl Slabbert. Inside the NP itself one had three factions, namely liberal (Verligtes), Moderates (Draadsitters), and Conservatives (Verkramptes).

Around the Braais one would find friends and family with the entire spectrum of political views debating religion and politics, of which few actually had any idea. The Afrikaners of the time were for the most part political ignoramuses. Their political believes were based on Black and White racial politics and the threat of Communism which was from the Devil. Asked them what “Liberal” and “Conservative” meant, they probably would not know.

Typical braai conversation would be, between a liberal and a conservative Afrikaner and the liberal would ask the conservative,

“OK, so you believe in Apartheid, but when you go to heaven, would there also be Apartheid in heaven? Does God have a heaven for blacks and another for whites, or how does it work? Or do you believe that only whites go to heaven? Do blacks also have souls or only whites? What about all those converted blacks out there who converted to Christianity?”

Another question would be, “OK, so you say you are so conservative…The laws have now changed. It is now possible for whites to marry or have sex with blacks…What are you going to do when your son or daughter comes home with a black man or a coloured woman?”

So with these questions in the minds of white South Africans of the time let us consider the de Klerk family.

The De Klerk Family

 When one thinks that F.W. de Klerk was Ultra Conservative then it is still nothing compared to Marike (Willemse) de Klerk his first wife. She was an extremely benevolent person who helped the poor Afrikaners a lot, but she was even more conservative than F.W. De Klerk.

Her father, Wilhelm Willemse, was an academic and writer. He was Professor of Social Pathology and Psychology at Pretoria University.

Nevertheless, the couple never had any children of their own. They adopted three children together; Jan, Willem, and Susan, whom they obviously brought up with their religious convictions and conservative values.

Little Willem de Klerk, turned out to be the black sheep of the family.

He was about 18/19 at the time that P.W. Botha abolished the Immorality Act in 1985 that prohibited sex between whites and coloureds. He was also one of the first to take advantage of this new found freedom.

F.W. de Klerk’s youngest son had a weakness for all those attractive coloured girls down in the Cape.


While he was a student at the Cape Technikon he met a young coloured lady that took his fancy called Erica Adams. Erica was the daughter of a Coloured politician namely Deon Adams of the Labour Party. They were madly and passionately in love and wanted to get married, they got engaged, but his mother Marike flipped out. No ways that she wanted coloured grandchildren, especially not from her darling youngest boy Willempie.

She told him that he was putting his entire father’s work in jeopardy. That he was going to destroy South Africa if he continued the relationship with this coloured girl. After two years of severe pressure from his mother Willem ended the relationship with Erica.

Willem then went on to marry a White Afrikaner girl called Hermien Mostert. She was an ex teacher and at the time she held a senior post at Woolworths. At their wedding Dominee Pieter Bingle did the table prayer. ds. Kobus van der Westhuyzen moderator of the NGK in the Western Cape married them.

Nevertheless the marriage lasted four and a half years. The couple got divorced around the same time that F.W. de Klerk got divorced from Marike…more on that later.

While young Willem was married to Hermien, the owner of a very popular restaurant in Kloof Street, Cape Town, said Willem de Klerk and a woman with dark hair had visited the restaurant a month before and were openly affectionate with one another.

Who was this mysterious dark haired woman? Her name was, Nicole Norodien. Another Cape Coloured exotic beauty for young Willem De Klerk. Willem then married her in Paarl in February 2003.

He started to divorce her in 2009 (the case is still ongoing) after she had an affair with a Johannesburg Businessman, Ernest Lefebvre. Willem de Klerk sued Lefebre for R200,000 but lost.

During the divorce case she claimed that De Klerk was "unpredictable and aggressive" towards her, and that he is "emotionally and verbally abusive". Norodien described him as "regularly intoxicated", adding that he drank "excessive" amounts of alcohol. She claimed he had been having an affair and said he had had several previous adulterous relationships.

Nevertheless he had two children with Norodien.

Norodien also wanted the court to order De Klerk to pay her maintenance of R15 000 a month, as well as comprehensive medical aid cover, a car worth R300 000, a house of up to R2-million or R20 000 a month for accommodation and "household necessaries" worth R200 000.

Was Norodien right? Was Willem de Klerk now having another affair with another coloured woman? Yes.


Willem De Klerk now 44 years old has just (May 2011) settled out of court with another coloured woman named Desiré Joseph , a 27 year old midwife at the Tygerberg Hospital. She comes from the Boland town of Wellington where her parents own a furniture shop.

They met in a pub in the town of Paarl. She claimed that he was the father of her child Ana-Wilmien, but he denied it and wanted paternity tests done. Paternity test proved that he was indeed the father of the child.

Why did she leave him? She said she caught him with another coloured woman in the same pub when she was seven months pregnant.

The end result today is that former President F.W. de Klerk now has three coloured grand children. His worst fears came to life. What we spoke about around braais happened to him. His son came home with a coloured woman…several in fact…and several grandchildren.

How could he still morally justify Apartheid when his son was producing coloured grand children on a regular basis?

All F.W. de Klerk’s superior education as a lawyer, his conservative convictions, his Ultra Conservative religious beliefs that he raised his children on all came to naught when his youngest boy came home with a coloured girl and evinced a weakness for Cape Coloured beauties.

As a once Ultra Conservative politician it must have chewed F.W. de Klerk up inside. Although Willem was an adopted child, he was still raised in the De Klerk household. He attended church and Sunday school, graduated with a “Boere Matriek” called “Katkisasie”, accepted into the Gereformeerde Kerk, the Boer church, yet still he discarded all of those conservative upbringings and still went for race mixing.


Under Apartheid laws F.W. de Klerk’s son would have been in prison.
F.W. de Klerk had to make peace with this and that his grand children would be coloureds. One can almost have sympathy with him today. His Ideology changed from Ultra Conservative to Liberal. A rare occurrence, for normally it is the other way around.

The “E” for Ego

 We have already seen that F.W. de Klerk thought of himself in a narcissist way as singled out by God to save South Africa.

Nevertheless. During the early years of F.W. de Klerk’s presidency he traveled to London where in 1989 his friend Dawie De Villiers, former Springbok Rugby player, turned liberal politician and at the time ambassador to London, introduced him to a Greek couple Tony and Elita Georgiadis.

Tony Georgiadis and his brother are the owners of a shipping company operating out of London called Alandis.

During the sanction years against South Africa, Tony Georgiadis went out of his way to deliver oil to South Africa. He bankrolled the National Party and defied international sanctions to deliver oil to our country.

However, Tony Georgiades name appeared again when Independent Democrats leader Patricia de Lille released her "arms deal dossier" in 1999, identifying him as a lobbyist for German arms ¬companies.

In 2008 the M&G revealed that Georgiadis received at least $22-million from ship-builder Thyssen for lobbying fees and paid more than three amounts of R500 000 to the ANC and two charities linked to Nelson Mandela and his wife, Graça.

Tony Georgiades and his former father in law George Lanaras, the father of Elita are business partners and were the targets of German investigations into the arms deal.

Elita married Tony Georgiadis in 1971, but divorced him in 1998 to marry former South African president FW de Klerk. Georgiadis had in the meantime begun transferring his circle of contacts to the new Mandela government.

Marike and F.W. de Klerk became good friends with the Giorgiadis couple. They became frequent visitors to Greece where they were the guests of the Giorgiadises on Tony’s luxury motor yacht.


Elita was a spoiled woman. She grew up rich and had a privileged life and was bored of all the luxury. She started to have an affair with the very religious and conservative F.W. de Klerk. Apparently God turned a blind eye at the time, because De Klerk was still the chosen one…

By 1994, Georgiadis suspected his wife of having feelings for De Klerk and confronted the outgoing president about it. De Klerk agreed to sever contact with Elita, but he did not. Maybe if he prayed and asked the Lord to show him the way, he would have had another Damascus moment.

Nevertheless during the entire time of the Codesa negotiations, also known as the “Roelf and Cyril show”, De Klerk was disinterested. All he had on his mind when our country was handed over to Marxist terrorists gangsters was his Greek mistress.

De Klerk was totally obsessed with Elita. He followed her around like a lost puppy. He was so besotted that he was not thinking rationally. His entire country was slipping into the hands of criminal Marxist scum, his people about to be slaughtered, yet De Klerk could not care less. De Klerk was betraying his friend Tony, he was betraying his wife Marike, he was betraying God and it was only natural that he would eventually betray his people too.


To understand what type of person De Klerk is, one has to remember that he left his wife Marike on Valentine’s Day 1998 to live with his mistress. Six days after the death of Marike he married Elita.

In her emotional biography, Marike: A Journey Through Summer and Winter, ghost-written by Maretha Maartens, the former first lady described the closing chapter of the couple's marriage.

Of the day the former president left, she wrote:

"He walked to the front door with his suitcases and we stretched out our arms to one another, hugged one another and shook like reeds in the north wind.

"He cried, so did I. I told him: 'If you change your mind, I'll forgive everything - up to 70 times seven.'

"... He whispered: 'I'm certain about my decision. Stop hoping.'"

Where was Dominee Pieter Bingle to intervene and chastise his friend F.W. de Klerk? Instead of preaching to him about skanks such as Jezebel or Delilah he searched for a fig leaf to cover F.W. de Klerk’s sins. He told the people not to judge De Klerk and that those without sin should throw the first stone.

The “M” for Money

 Was F.W. paid to hand over South Africa? How did he gain financially?

Well, he obtained half of the Nobel Prize which is about $1,4 million dollars. It means F.W: got about $700,000 officially for handing the country over. He wrote a biography and got royalties from other books about him. He travels the world and delivers speeches as the chairman of the F.W. de Klerk Foundation and the chairman of the Global Leadership Foundation and obviously makes a bit of money like that.

This is all legal. The question we need to ask is was he paid a specific sum? How much was he paid and most importantly who paid the piper and called the tune?

In a report in the Citizen , Steven Motale reported that former president P.W. Botha in an interview with a Dutch Newspaper a few days before his death alleged that De Klerk received “Millions of dollars” to hand over the country to the ANC.

P.W. Botha made the same allegations to author Jan Lamprecht
when Lamprecht visited him at his home “Die Anker” in George. The amount was not even that big. $3 million or something to that effect.

Apparently P.W. Botha said he knew about the offer, because the same offer was made to him. He did not accept. He also did not say how big the offer was or who the donor/s were.

The leader of the HNP Willie Marais wrote a letter to De Klerk asking for his explanation and why the money was not declared. De Klerk threatened with lawyers in the light of libelous accusations, yet he never went through with it. The National prosecuting Authority and the Scorpions simply ignored these allegations and it was never investigated.

What we do know is that in 2008 De Klerk owned a prestigious wine farm in the Cape called “Wildepaardejacht” which was his residence for ten years. It had 14 hectares of vineyards and 7 hectares of olives and fruit orchards. It went on the market for R35 million.

After this De Klerk bought himself a R20 million mansion in Fresnaye in Cape Town where he is still living today with his Greek wife.

Have no doubts. F.W. de Klerk is not a poor man today.

Whether he took the money that was offered to him and P.W. Botha, is hard to say. Whether the NPA will ever investigate it fully is another question. What concerns me more is who could have been the possible sponsors?

A glimpse of this comes from two books. The first one I already touched on, namely, “Tomorrow is another Country” by Allister Sparks, formerly a journalist from the Anti Apartheid newspaper the Rand Daily Mail and the man who exposed the Muldergate, Eschel Rhoodie so called “Information Scandal”.

Sparks tells us that the secret negotiations between prominent Afrikaners including F.W. de Klerk’s brother Wimpie was sponsored by Consolidated Gold Fields, a British Mining Company established in 1887, 12 years before the British went after the gold in the two former Boer Republics of the ZAR and the Orange Free State.

On page 82, Spark says that there were twelve of these secret meetings, between November 1987 and May 1990. Eleven of them took place at Mells Park House, in the village of Mells, near Bath, Somersetshire, a luxury estate belonging to Consolidated Gold Fields.


Sparks mentions that the man behind it all was the director of public affairs at Consolidated Goldfields, Michael Young.

He was the mediator or facilitator in these secret meetings. It was his job to find the role-players for the secret meetings. It was his job to get Professor Willie Esterhuyse and Thabo Mbeki amongst others drunk on Glenfiddich, telling jokes and yarn swapping so they could see that in their drunken state they were all the same. All the the air fares, food and liquor were sponsored by Michael Young and Consolidated Gold Fields. A small price to pay for all the gold in South Africa.

You can read about The Briton who facilitated the secret meetings over here. Today it is hardly a secret anymore; In 2009 they produced a movie for BBC Chanel 4 called “Endgame” telling us everything about the secret meetings facilitated by Michael Young. At the time the meetings were ultra secret, illegal and participants talking to a terrorist organization such as the ANC would not only lose their jobs, they would be imprisoned. The ANC was on the CIA’s list of the ten worst terrorist organizations in the world…not that it actually mattered, because the CIA was funding them.



The French have a saying, that if you want to hide something, all you have to do is put it in the centre of the picture and nobody will notice it.

This model or method of getting role players secretly together to betray their countries worked so well in the case of South Africa that Michael Young wants to export it to capture other nations.


Who needs war nowadays? As Prof. Willie Esterhuyse told his students afterwards, these things nowadays get decided over a bottle of single malt whisky. The end result is the so-called “Peace” we have in South Africa at the moment.

The other players in this game are exposed in the book, „Really Inside Boss“ by P.C. Swanepoel, a retired senior National Intelligence Services agent (Director of Research) who discovered the role of the CIA in funding the ANC and other terrorist organizations in South Africa through various front companies and conduits in the UK and South Africa as well as through student organizations in South Africa.

When Swanepoel went to his boss, “Lang Hendrik” van den Bergh to tell him what he had discovered, General van den Bergh, also known as “The Tall Man” turned a blind eye. He refused to even read the reports.

William Rourke “Big Bill” Jordan, who ran a company called IMCO in the centre of Sandton City Centre, Johannesburg, was the head of the CIA’s Special Operations in South Africa at the time.

Big Bill was a personal friend of General Van den Bergh. He uses to spend his Sundays on General Van den Bergh’s farm driving his tractor around to get some fresh air. (pg99).

Today one shudders to believe the naiveté of our former National Intelligence masters. In those days we believed that the West was our friends. We were always Pro-Western and even fought on the side of the West in two World Wars. It was incomprehensible that these people would one day betray us.

It is wrong of us to say today that “The Americans betrayed us” or “The English were at it again like in the Boer war.”

The average American or Englishman today has no idea of what their hidden governments; the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs were up to. They are as much victims of the same organizations as we are in South Africa.

It appears as if these people, The Anglo American Establishment of the CFR and the RIIA through their agents, the CIA and MI6, in co-operation with big business, were the ones who made the offers to P.W. Botha and F.W. De Klerk. If F.W. de Klerk indeed took any of the money it would be interesting to find out if it was declared and whether he paid taxes on it.

The “C” for Coercion

 So we have covered the M, the I and the E of M.I.C.E.

However, what did the C in M.I.C.E stand for again? It stood for “Coercion”…meaning what did they blackmail him on?

The State Security Council

During the time of P.W. Botha, he formed what was called the State Security Council. It was a group of about 100 civil servants from various departments. Its function was to advise the government on formulating and executing national security policy. Botha himself chaired the SSC. F.W. De Klerk was a member of the SSC from 1985-1989.

These were the people who decided how the enemies of Apartheid should be “removed”. They were the ones who gave the orders to hit squads such as the Civil Cooperation Bureau (military) and Vlakplaas’ unit C10, later called C1 (Police) and later denied having any knowledge of atrocities and human rights abuses.

Today the head of Vlakplaas Eugene de Kock is serving a 212 year prison sentence for doing the jobs nobody else wanted to do and which he was instructed to do by the SSC.

Minutes of the meetings of the State Security Council shows that F.W. de Klerk was present when the decision was taken to “Remove” Mathew Goniwe.

Goniwe and the so called “Cradock four” were abducted, beaten and murdered by three Black Security Branch policemen a Sergeant Faku, Sergeant Mgoduka, and one Sakati . They burnt the bodies in the car that Goniwe was traveling in.

The three policemen themselves who participated in the killing of the activists were later killed in a car bomb blast at Motherwell in 1989.

The usage of semantics such as “Remove” would later emerge to be simply meaning offering the person a job in the Transkei or something to that effect…it never meant “Kill”. These were the word games De Klerk was playing when he personally ordered the killing of five sleeping teenage boys in 1993 when the Codesa negotiations were coming to a close.

Funny enough, when political opponents of the NP turned up dead one after the other, after the SSC ordered them to be “Removed”, no enquiry was ever made. No investigations, no arrests…nothing.

De Klerk had many skeletons in his closet, not just his love affair with his Greek mistress at the time (that nobody knew of).

A few years later his former wife Marike wrote two books. Her second book, “A place where the sun still shines” was an attempt to help women who are going through the same as she went through with F. W. de Klerk.

She wrote an entire chapter on F.W. de Klerk. She was bitter and suffering from depression.

The editor of Marike de Klerk’s two books, Maretha Maartens of publishers Carpe Diem, sent a copy of the chapter to F.W. de Klerk. The chapter was called, Grotgesprek (Cave Conversation).

F.W. De Klerk was livid. Maartens confirmed to Afrikaans newspaper Rapport that the chapter was deleted at FW’s request adding that a compromise was reached whereby some portions were published while others, the more bitter elements, were withdrawn.

Both F.W. de Klerk and Rapport has a copy of the original chapter. It is being kept from the public. What was it that Marike de Klerk wanted to reveal in her book? An anonymous source provided Rapport with the chapter, where Marike warns Elita that she too will die alone.

Marike was brutally murdered under mysterious circumstances at her Bloubergstrand sea view apartment at the Dolphin Beach complex on the fourth of December 2001.

I have heard from a person who was close to her that Marike was working on a third book in which she would “Reveal all” about F.W. de Klerk’s treachery.

Marike was growing more and more desponded with the crime situation in South Africa and she knew that F.W. de Klerk had a big part in betraying South Africa and its entire people. She was married to him for 39 years after all. She would know exactly how much money he received and by whom it was paid.

To use F.W.’s semantics…for this she was “Removed”.

Summary

 In my analysis it is clear that the entire scope of MICE was used to get De Klerk to capitulate and commit the ultimate treason. His sins were covered up into the finest detail. For instance he incessantly chews gum to hide that he is a chain smoker of Stuyvesants.

The public was duped. The F.W. de Klerk that we saw on television was a tall clean shaven intelligent man always with a smile on his face. The people were taken in by him. He was the new broom, and boy was he sweeping clean…getting rid of all those cob-webs of the old Apartheid era. The real F.W. de Klerk was a different man. Inherently a traitor of note.

Today F.W. de Klerk is fully aware of the fact that white South Africans and other minorities consider him as a traitor. In August 2010 F.W. de Klerk was interviewed by Murray La Vita of Beeld and F.W. said that the name “Traitor” doesn’t bother him.

The man simply has no conscience. No remorse about what he has done to his people. At least Judas hanged himself after betraying Jesus, but F.W. de Klerk is still with us. He doesn’t see himself as a traitor. He sees himself as something like Jesus reincarnated…An example to the world…The savior of South Africa…

The world acknowledged it after all when he received second prize at the Nobel prize ceremony, next to God Mandela.

De Klerk is unrepentant. He still firmly believes that he did the right thing in the interest of all South Africans. If one considers the corruption and misrule of the ANC, the high crime rate the discrimination against whites and other minorities in South Africa, then it becomes hard to understand De Klerk’s reasoning. The question begs, “Is the man blind?”

During the Anglo Boer War, the Boers used to execute his type by firing squad.

18 May 2011

Voting in South Africa: The ”Democratic“ farce in a Socialist One-Party state



By Mike Smith
18th of May 2011

D-Day for the ANC has arrived. They will probably win as usual, but only because of sheer numbers, not because they are so good. They are pathetic in fact. Worst government this country ever had.

The whole week I have had questions like, “Mike, what are you voting?” or “Mike what should we vote?”

Well that is up to the individual and a private matter. I just want people to be informed before they cast their vote.

Personally, I would not vote at all. I see the ANC as an illegitimate government. They are a Marxist terrorist organization who came to power through a terror and intimidation campaign and secret dealings with the National Party that they were not mandated to do.

The 1994 election in any case was rigged with many cases of ballot stuffing and the IEC who was suppose to be neutral was chockfull of ANC members

What is the purpose of voting anyway? If the ANC ever loses they will not give up power willingly. They will resume the armed struggle, complete with bombing and necklacing. It is what Marxist terrorists do.

I believe that the ANC should be recognized for what they are, namely Marxist terrorists scum and they should be dealt with appropriately.

Traditionally I would endorse the Cape Party, but only because they stand for the independence of the Cape Province. I still have a problem with their “Non-racial” policy.

And that is probably my issue with all the political parties in South Africa. They are all “non-racial”, which is total bollocks.

South Africa has huge racial issues. At the core of all our problems is RACE. It has always been at the heart of politics in South Africa.


We cannot ignore the elephant in the room and pretend it doesn’t exist. It is not magically going to dissolve and disappear simply because political parties adopt a blindfolded ostrich strategy of “If I cannot see it then it doesn’t exist”.

Unless we are honest enough to face the issue of Race, we will never advance. We need to face the core issues of this country, which are racial issues and solve that first, before we will be able to make headway at all. We need to find a solution that we can all live with and be happy with. Everything else is just dishonest window dressing.

If I were a black man, I would probably vote for the DA. Their policies are exactly the same as the ANC’s, they will just be less corrupt than the ANC. The DA fully supports the ANC’s communist Freedom Charter that was drawn up by the Communist Lionel Bernstein. They also support racist policies of Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment that discriminates against whites The DA also supports name changes of streets and towns to that of struggle heroes, thereby undermining our white history in South Africa and our culture…and then there is also the issue of the DA wanting to be “BLACK”, complete with a black struggle song, “Vulindlela” that means “open the way”…and the comical Toi-toi-ing of their White Madam leader, Helen Zille.

The DA’s support base is 80% white…and of those most are Afrikaners, but the DA will not choose an Afrikaans or English song for their campaign. If it wasn’t for the white Afrikaners, the DA would not be where they are today.

In all fairness, the DA has run the Cape better and less corrupt than the ANC, but rest assured, they still believe in the same kind of Racial Socialism as the ANC, i.e. Taking money from the whites and giving it to the blacks.

As a nationalist I am fully opposed to Socialism of any kind. I do not believe in punishing the hardworking, successful and productive members of society to reward the lazy, useless and unproductive of society. It simply doesn’t make sense.

Therefore, as a white person, I cannot support the DA.

Then there is the Freedom Front (Plus-minus). That is what they are. Almost Conservative and plus-minus liberal. One never knows what their policies are. The one moment they still supported an Afrikaner Homeland and the next it is out the window. Then they say they support the Afrikaners, but still claims to be…you guessed it…”Non-racial”.

Being non racial and at the same time supporting the Afrikaners is a contradiction in terms.

The FF+/- also supports Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment, they only believe that it should be implemented fairly as stipulated in Dirk Hermann’s little booklet. One cannot discriminate against whites and especially Afrikaners in a “Fair” way…it is like a partial circumcision. It is either or. It is a binary on/off. You either do it or you leave it the hell alone.

You cannot claim to support Afrikaners and at the same time support policies that are detrimental to the Afrikaners. And since the leader of the Freedom Front +/-  decided to go and pitch his tent in the ANC camp, they can forget about my vote. Pieter Mulder is a deputy minister and Jacob Zuma is his boss. His farther must be turning in his grave.

Cope? No hope!

The IFP are nothing but a bunch of has-been, wannabee ANC’s. Same policies, same shit different party. Buthelezi could have had freedom for the Zulu’s, but he rejected it. He should join the ANC.

So nothing else remains. It doesn’t matter what you vote, Socialism is what you will get. It is just the degree of corruption that will vary. The Parties in South Africa are all Socialist; all are multi-racial, anti-white and anti-Afrikaner.

South Africa is not a democracy. It is effectively a one Party Socialist State.

In my opinion, the best vote is to cast a special vote like I have…vote with your feet. GTFO of South Africa. Paying taxes and voting in South Africa is like administering chemo therapy to a cancer patient, you are just prolonging the inevitable…To save the patient, you have to cut out the cancer.

But South Africans are slow learners. It took them fourty years of Apartheid to figure out it does not work. So far it has taken 17 years of ANC misrule to figure out the Black Socialist, Rainbow Nation bollocks is a pipe-dream and that Blacks cannot govern.

It will take a while longer before they realize that the only solution is to cut out the cancer. Hopefully by that time the patient won’t be dead already.

17 May 2011

To all those in the Cape who are voting tomorrow…My thoughts are with you.

By mike Smith 17th of May 2011


Waterblommetjies
Sonja Herholdt
Inleiding
Waterblommetjies in die Boland.
Waterblommetjies van die Kaap.
Maak die bredie net soos, in die wynland.
En sê jy is baie lief vir my, voor jy gaan slaap.
Daardie wind waai weer, by my voordeur in.
Hy maak my hart weer, lekker sing.
Dit is gaaf, om die kaap weer dag te sê.
En ek vat jou saam, na die koringland.
Wie ry saam, as my hart so brand.
Dit is lekker om die Boland lief te hê.
Van Hunks het al sy pyp gestop.Tafelberg se hoed is op.
En die bergies begin al huis se kant toe staan.
Groenpunttoring knip sy oog.
Die Suidoos maak so ’n wye boog.
En die waalpad help jou, as jy huis toe gaan.
Oh, die luggie hier is vry waar my hart heeltyd wil bly.
En ek wil my langs Oumies Victoria neer gaan vly.
Laat ons deur die tuine loop.
By die parade, iets gaan koop.
As die wind so koud waai.
Laat ek eers gou jou jas vasknoop.
Want daar is.
Waterblommetjies in die Boland.
Waterblommetjies van die Kaap.
Maak die bredie net soos, in die wynland.
En sê jy is baie lief vir my, voor jy gaan slaap.
O, Kaap, o Kaap, o, mooiste Kaap.Jy maak my hart weer baie seer.Jou Ghantang, kom mos altyd weer en weer.
Die Mayflower het uitgevaar.

En gaan snoek haal daar by Houtbaai, waar Karbonkelberg die stormsee gewaar.

Drie skepsels, het by Dassiepunt, na die ster gekyk,
en teen die wind in voet geslaan, en die stralekrans aangegee.
Hulle het teruggekeer na Tafelbaai.
En op Duiwelspiek vir die engel gewaai.
En die engel het trane uit sy oë gevee.
Want daar is.
Waterblommetjies in die Boland.
Waterblommetjies van die Kaap.
Maak die bredie net soos, in die wynland.
En sê jy is baie lief vir my, voor jy gaan slaap.
Lirieke - Anton Goosen

Sowetan's pathetic attempt at Psy-ops



By Mike Smith
17th of May 2011
Here is a prime example of how the media in South Africa exercises Psy-ops.
About a year ago, on the 22nd of July 2010 the Black Newspaper the Sowwetan ran a story of a Black (Congolese couple) now living in the UK who suddenly had a white baby born in the family. The baby is not albino.
All sorts of bullshit pseudo-biology about generations of past white and black heritage intermixing and that the black father is the real father…yadda, yadda bullshit was explained
The original Sowetan article from 2010 can be found here here

The most amazing thing is that one year later, on the eve of the local elections in South Africa, Sowetan goes and digs up the story again and publishes it as if it happened yesterday. The latest version Of the Sowetan Psy-ops attempt.

 
Now the question emerges…Why would the Sowetan go and dig up this story on the eve of the local elections at a time when the ANC is about to get a bitter wakeup call from discontented black voters?

Did someone in the ANC pay someone at the Sowetan to fuel racial problems between blacks and whites in South Africa? Who are these wankers behind the scenes who think we won’t notice?

This  must have been the poorest and lamest attempt at Psy-ops I have ever seen in my life. What an amateur textbook example of how to lose all credibility. It is actually going to backfire on the ANC.

What is it that they wanted to say? That white men screw black women? That white men rape black women and black men are the victims of sneaky white men? This case for a start has no relevance on South Africa. It is a Congolese couple in the UK.

No…come on…this is pathetic. I knew the media in South Africa was pro-ANC biased and pathetic, but this one takes the cake. How can anybody take the sowetan seriously after this comic attempt at psy-ops. It must be  an apprentice new employee…I have no other explanation

If you are voting tomorrow make sure you have the correct South African Bar Coded ID

By Make Smith
17th of May 2011

Well at least this one won't have a problem to find a job or get into university.


Yeah, just be Happy mon.


And you thought he went to Neverland...Nah...alive and well in Cape Town South Africa, ek sê...


South Africa's answer to the Cuba Libra.


South Africa's answer to 50 Cent?


What were your parents thinking Boet...?


And don't forget those Ever Efficient Affirmative Action ANC civil servants at The Department of Home Affairs.


(Let op na strepie op I) Note the stripe on the I.