29 July 2016

A big thank you from the ANC for your campaign contributions

By Mike Smith
30th of July 2016

Just in case you were wondering what happens to all your hard earned tax money...Wasted on the ANC's campaign.

This picture was taken and sent in by a regular reader near Hazyview last weekend.


Divine backing of the ANC: The Gods must be crazy


By Mike Smith
29th of July 2016

Just the other day The ANC’s Gwede Mantashe said the ANC is God’s chosen party and that the ANC was personally anointed by God to rule South Africa.

I don’t know so much about that, but I do know that God sometimes moves in mysterious ways. It could be that God is setting them up for a big fall, but they have that base covered, because when God fails them, then they have the dead ancestors behind them. Zuma said: Vote ANC or the ancestors will punish you

“The ancestors are turning their backs against you if you leave the ANC and you will have bad luck,” he said at an election rally in Letlhabile near Brits.

“They [opposition parties] know they will not win – why should you waste your vote on them?” he asked.

So if Zuma is so sure that the ANC will win then why does he still bother to tell them to vote for the ANC? Who needs a stupid vote if God already anointed you to rule and the ancestors are backing you?

However there could be a conflict of interests, because the clergy, God’s representatives here on earth or the whores of Satan, are not backing the corrupt terrorist ANC anymore…that they helped to bring to power during Apartheid with their Satanic “Liberation Theology”. Catholic bishops want voters to send politicians a warning message and tell them that they are tired of corruption

The mayor of Cape Town, who was once a PAC terrorist herself, said that Zuma was possessed by Satan. De Lille says: Zuma is possessed by the Devil

Judging from how much money the ANC is spending on their election campaign…I would say they are also backed by Mammon and if you watch the cringe worthy Al Jazeera interview with International Relations and Co-operation Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, I would say that Bacchus/Dionysus is also in the bed with the ANC somewhere.
ANC election campaign hits R1Billion

However if you look at how the ANC is losing ground in the major Metros ...then I would say that the god Cronus is calling time on their asses and Hades is waiting down there with a moerse big fork.

All I know is that God cannot possibly back the ANC, because in Job 15:31 God tells us why we should never vote for the ANC…."Let him not trust in emptiness, deceiving himself; For emptiness will be his reward.”

And I am sure that in 1 Samuel 12:21 God had the useless ANC in mind when he said: “You must not turn aside, for then you would go after futile things which cannot profit or deliver, because they are futile.”

What has the ANC ever delivered? I rest my case.


28 July 2016

Merkel still insists on integrating Muslims into European society

By Mike Smith
28th of July 2016

“We can do this”…Merkel about Muslim invasion of Europe one year ago.

“We can do this” …Merkel today after the Muslim terrorist attacks in Germany.

Merkel, Despite Attacks and Critics, Renews Vow to Integrate Migrants

You have to wonder if this woman has rocks for brains or whether she is in on the act. I will go with the second option, because in my opinion she is a Communist sleeper.

Muslims will NEVER integrate in Europe. They view Christians and Europeans with disgust because Europeans eat pork, drink alcohol and allow their women to dress how they like.

A year ago I spelled out my ten concerns about the Muslim invasion of Europe in which I said that these people cannot just enter Germany uncontrolled.

Now...Joachim Herrmann, the Bavarian interior minister, insisted that the policy of allowing migrants to enter the country unscreened must be stopped, in a direct challenge to the existing policy of Ms. Merkel’s government.

“There can no longer be uncontrolled entry into the country,” said Mr. Herrmann

No shit Sherlock...bit late now don't you think? You already allowed 2 million of them in, what difference is another 2 million going to make?

Rather go knock on the door of the Pope in the Vatican and ask him to declare a Holy Crusade. That is the only way you are going to stop this invasion and turn it back.



Rape culture? What rape culture?

By Mike Smith
28th of July 2016

I always wondered how they got that smell up there.

Kwa-Zulu Natal man gets 12 year sentence for raping wife with fish can

What amazes me is how our judges can still remain objective when they have to hear such cases on a daily basis. I am sure every judge and prosecutor in this country can write a book on all the strange stuff they have come across dealing with these savages.

But that is not all. Take note of how the media buries a child rape case in the same story further down when they refer to: “In a separate incident, a 26-year-old man was sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape and kidnapping of an 11-year-old girl. He dragged her into the nearby bushes and raped her.“

See? Just by the way…another child was raped. Nothing new. Move on.

And then this one 53yo man raped an 11-year-old girl, and gave her R10 to keep quiet about it

Then two months ago Judge Mabel Jansen was suspended for saying that there is a rape culture amongst blacks. Damn right there is. Underground rape culture does exists Khayelitsha woman says

Behind the bad weather. Major conspiracy uncovered

By Mike Smith
27th of July 2016

Currently the country is being swept away by bad weather and storms…

Snow, floods and now a Tornado

…But fear not. The conspiracy has been uncovered. We know who the culprits are:













25 July 2016

Judge Chris Jafta says Afrikaner culture belongs to the dustbin of history


By Mike Smith
25th of July 2016

What never ceases to amaze/amuse me is how the Afrikaner, after his virtual political Hara-Kiri in ’94 is fighting a daily trench battle against the leftist spawn of Satan who is not content with the political kick-to-the-curb of the disarmed, disenfranchised and ten-to-one outnumbered white minority, but want him totally eighty-sixed off the menu of cultures in South Africa.

Case in point is the group of unionists and activists collectively known as Soliforum (Solidarity and Afriforum) that seems to be struggling from one long court battle against the Marxist ANC to the next in defense of what should be constitutional imperatives.

Afriforum wins court battle over University of the Free State language policy

Maybe I missed something about the dead terrorist Mandela’s triple-negative promise of a New (Improved) South Africa when he said that “Never, never and never again shall it be that this beautiful land will again experience the oppression of one by another.”

…Or maybe I just understood "oppression" wrong, because 22 years later, the already marginalized Afrikaner is experiencing the boot of oppression stomping down on his face on a daily basis. Why should Afrikaners still have to go to court to defend their constitutional right to be educated in their mother tongue at their own universities?

Take for instance the recent case that Soliforum lost about the cultural genocide of changing Afrikaner street and place names in Pretoria and Constitutional Court Judge, Christopher Jafta, said afterwards in an article on Politicsweb that Afrikaner Culture belongs in the dustbin of history

It is a long article of saying everything from mostly nothing to sweet blue buggerall. You can read it if you can stomach his subjective drivel, but the gist is like this.

“You Afrikaners are all racist and oppressive scum who brought nothing good to South Africa and should therefore sit down, shut the fuck up and take your beating you deserve. Your culture is evil and inherently racist and should therefore be wiped off the face of the earth.”

There. Took me four lines to say what the learned judge took four months to write.

Of course, apart from being an Affirmative Action nobody who in his own words were promoted too rapidly from a rural Transkei court interpreter to ConCourt judge, Judge Chris Jafta is also an idiot with a long history of embarrassing and controversial decisions often not supported by his colleagues and described by senior advocates as "awful" and "inexplicable".

He is also a backpedalling coward who cannot face up to his decisions that led to charges of gross misconduct when judge Hlope asked him to rule in favour of president Zuma and the Constitutional Court laid a public complaint against Hlophe which Jafta and his equally stupid sidekick Nkabinde supported. This was just the start of what became known as the “Hlope circus”.

Six years later Jafta and Nkabinde went up against themselves in court saying their own complaint was not legally valid. They were nailed by legal commentators for bringing the Constitutional Court into disrepute.

The High Court dismissed the judges' application in 2014, but Dumb and Dummerer appealed. The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed that appeal in 2016, criticizing Jafta and Nkabinde's damaging court application and implying that the case raised questions about their "integrity".

On 6 April 2016, Jafta and Nkabinde filed an appeal to the Constitutional Court – their own court – asking it to overturn the Supreme Court of Appeal's judgment saying that the SCA made "hurtful" imputations about them.

All this despite the fact that the Constitutional Court already held in 2012 that it cannot hear appeals in the Hlophe matter and that any SCA judgment was final.

See, the point? They don’t even know how the legal system and the courts work, but they want to be constitutional judges. Clearly the Roman Dutch law system is too advanced and wasted on them. They would be better off as elders ruling in a tribal judgment somewhere in a Bundu court held in a grass hut in rural Transkei.

Now according to the cultural relativists and the racial egalitarians, both law systems are equal, western lawyers and tribal elders are equal and western doctors and Sangomas are equal.

This brings us to another one of those great contradictions of the learned left who believe that “Equality before the law” means something different than that all people, rich and poor, clever or stupid are subject to the same laws of justice and “Due process”.

In fact, Article 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that "All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law."

Of course in the case of South Africa we know this is bullshit considering Zuma’s rape case, the 783 cases of corruption against him, the Nkandla ruling and of course Hlaudi Motsoeneng’s uttering’s that Zuma is somehow special.

I think it is safe to say that the justice system of the New (improved) South Africa is a farce. Nevertheless, the belligerent multiculturalists like the learned Judge Jafta believes that people are indeed all equal as far physical and mental abilities are concerned.

Now I don’t know if this equality thing is true in the insect world; I know for a fact it is not true amongst cats and dogs and it is certainly not true amongst my own people, the whites of South Africa. Why should equality then be found across races?

In a true test of the Infinite Monkey theorem these libtards believe that given the same environment, the same resources and enough time, anyone can be a Shakespeare, a Mozart or Da Vinci…and of course, that all cultures are the same…except that the White Western Culture is always worse and the Afrikaner culture only worthy of the dustbin of history.

So ultimately the judge, with his strong feelings about Afrikaans culture, in some perverse way, agrees with me that relativism is bullshit and all cultures are not the same and do not have equal worth.

Somewhere along the line one needs a standard to which one measures, otherwise five equals six, and in my culture that standard is the right to life and the protection of individual rights.

Now when I compare the white Afrikaner culture to Judge Jafta’s Xhosa culture where a woman’s worth is measured in cows (Lobola), where young girls are abducted and ritually raped by much older men to make them their wives (Ukutwala) and where young boys are genitally mutilated with rusty blades (Ulwaluko) to the point where their willies drop off from gangrene, then I must confess that the Afrikaner culture, with all its faults, measured to the standard of life and individual freedom is far superior to that of the culture of the educated Noble Savage, Judge Jafta.

But this brings us to another irony and that is that the same culture that gave Noble Savage Christopher Jafta his first name and his primitive ilk the opportunity to educate themselves by building schools and universities for them and by simply showing them writing, arithmetic and the concept of the wheel to catapult them from the Stone Age into modern society, is now the culture that he criticizes, hates and wants to relegate to the dustbin of history.

However, Jafta’s culture is the “Leitkultur” in South Africa (at least at the moment)…but it is a topsy-turvy artificial creation that is giving him a false sense of security like the levees of New Orleans gave the citizens of Louisiana a false sense of security during Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and just like it happened with the mighty Mississippi, the river of history also has a way of finding its natural course and sweeping artificial constructions away.

The wheel turns slowly, but it turns and Judge Jafta should be careful that his culture does not suffer in the near future what he wished on the Afrikaner culture yesterday.

24 July 2016

What really happened to those political snakes of the National Party?

By Mike Smith
25th of July 2016

Not a day goes by without some black politician or liberal white idiot in the media uttering blatant lies and hate-speech against Afrikaners and their history. This past weekend it was our illustrious über-racist president Jacob Zuma (again) in the Eastern Cape when he said that that blacks should not vote for the DA, because The DA is the spawn of the National Party and likened them to snakes:

Said Zuma. “When a snake, a poisonous one, gives birth, it gives birth to another snake. How can you vote for people who don't know you and who you don't know?”

Look I am no friend of the DA, but of course Zuma forgot to mention the snakes in his midst, because when the New NP disbanded in 2005 the ANC absorbed them all, not the DA.

ANC Caucus
With effect from the 5th August 2005, every single one of the NNP members of parliament became members of the ANC, in accordance with the system of crossing the floor in South Africa, which allowed politicians, elected on one party ticket, to defect to other parties or becoming independents. And they are still there albeit under the radar: Martinus van Schalkwyk, Pik Botha, André Gaum, Renier Schoeman, etc.

Don't just look at the black ministers that the ANC use as a front. Behind them you have all those deputy ministers and deputy directors general...All former NP snakes working for the ANC today.

Nevertheless the philandering sexist, rapist and polygamist Zuma even praised the young women wearing “doeks” (head scarves) in the audience and said he loved seeing them all dressed up.

Amazingly none of the hypocritical LWB’s in the Feminazi brigade said a word about that.

A convivial atmosphere prevailed, with supporters clearly lapping up Zuma's every word. He closed with his signature rendition of the "Umshini Wami" (Bring me my machine gun, so I can shoot the cowardly whites) struggle song before a performance by hip-hop artist AKA.

22 July 2016

Eastern Cape Blacks exonerate Apartheid. Saying Apartheid was better



By Mike Smith
22th of July 2016

It is not often that you hear this kind of objectivity from blacks:

"We shot ourselves in the foot by toppling the apartheid government‚" residents of an Eastern Cape village said on Thursday.

We were better off under Apartheid Timeslive, Malibongwe Dayimani, 21 Juli, 2016

Last I heard this kind of objectivity was when the Zulu king said the same.
Zulu King slams South African democracy; says Apartheid was better

But I guess things must be pretty bad if the Blacks in the ANC’s former stronghold of the Eastern Cape are admitting that they were better off under Apartheid.

“Tsholomnqa villagers had been waiting for a tarred road and decent houses for decades"‚ said community leader‚ Wele Ntshongola.”

Decades? Two long decades? You have been voting ANC continuously for two long decades and hoped, believed and trusted this spawn of Satan would deliver? Tell me something, Wele…why do you get upset when whites call you stupid?

I often get some liberal twats on here who say that Apartheid was evil, oppressed the blacks and the Chief Ministers of the Homelands were all corrupt.

I don’t know. Maybe they were corrupt. Show me one Sub-Saharan country where blacks are in charge that is NOT corrupt. However acknowledging that they were all corrupt should then be a clear sign that they were not fit to govern in the first place. So when are liberals going to apologise for betting on the wrong horse?

Continued Wele Ntshongola…"This village was in a good state under the Ciskei homeland led by LL (Lenox) Sebe. We used to have a tarred road... with workers who used to maintain it as well as free seed‚ crops and livestock." He said they celebrated when democracy dawned. "Little did we know that democracy would bring more oppression.”

"I am not saying that I agree with the policies or laws of apartheid‚ but at least we were getting service delivery back then." Ntshongola said.

Tja...you criticized the part without understanding the whole. You chucked the baby out with the bathwater and raised a monster. Now you complain?

Maybe, just maybe it is, Mr Ntshongola, that you never understood those policies of Apartheid properly. Anytime you want me to explain it to you, drop me a line.

See, the Apartheid government didn’t lie to blacks like the liberals and socialist do. We were honest with you and told you the truth.

The liberals and socialists lied to you. Their starting point was and still is that there are no differences between whites and blacks when simple observations tell us differently.

The Apartheid government acknowledged the differences in culture, in language, in beliefs and values of all the tribes of South Africa and acknowledged their rights to rule themselves and preserve their languages and cultures which are to a large extent distinct and sui generis.

The creation of the homelands of Ciskei, Transkei, Bop and Venda, etc, was not much different to what the Americans and Canadians did with the creation of the Indian and Eskimo Reservations. In those countries those policies were considered “Progressive”, why should it be different in SA?

In those countries they forcibly moved the Indians en masse to these reservation far away from their original lands, whereas in South Africa we created the black homelands on the soil the blacks picked out for themselves and settled themselves and we had more success than the USA and Canada as far as the protection of minorities and development of these homelands were concerned.

Instead of a “melting pot model” where all minorities were expected to speak one language (English) and where the American Negro lost his original culture and language in what can only be considered a “Cultural Genocide”, Apartheid South Africa insisted on mother tongue education for all groups in at least the primary school level and preserved the languages and cultures of South African blacks.

Today the Xhosa culture and language is intact, because of Apartheid, not despite of it. The same for the Zulu culture, the Venda, the Sotho, etc.

Surely then our system of Apartheid or “Separate Development” should have been considered even MORE progressive than that of the USA or Canada. If you break it down, Separate Development was based on the science of Anthropology, classical Western Liberalism and the Christian values of “live and let live”, “empathy” and “fairness”.

Apartheid ideologues were not mindless “racists” who opposed the principle of equality and wanted to “oppress” the native. However, bringing about equality brings up the big paradox of the racial egalitarian. Like Professor Stefan Possony (Stanford), the Austrian-born U.S. economist and military strategist who conceived the U.S. Strategic Defense Initiative, popularly known as Star Wars, explained: “If the principle of equality is to be implemented in a realistic and not in a purely legal manner, it calls for “unequal” measures.”

See, it works like this…If two people are to be given equal opportunities and if one person is handicapped while the other person is not, equal opportunity exists only if the handicapped individual is helped more amply and by qualitatively different means. Furthermore, the principle of equality does not apply only to individuals, but also to groups of individuals like ethnic groups.

Thus, if one group is “behind” or handicapped while the other is not, the trailing group must be helped more amply; and if the two groups are different in attitude and aptitude, they require differential types of assistance. Legislation that distinguishes between groups does not, because of those distinctions, violate the equality principle, but may implement it: e.g. a progressive tax is unequal treatment for a strictly egalitarian objective.

In the 1960’s South Africa stood accused before the International Court of Justice for “oppressing” and “exploiting” the natives, the judges, although they might not have agreed with Apartheid, after hearing South Africa’s case, disregarded the accusations which, for that matter, were dropped by the applicants themselves. The applicants then changed their strategy and tried to build a case on current world trends and world opinions instead of facts...and failed miserably. The court threw their case out.

Based on the 3000 pages of irrefutable evidence, in 1966, the Apartheid government was found NOT GUILTY by the ICJ of oppressing and exploiting any blacks in or of South Africa.

You want to see "Exploitation", Mr. Ntshongola??

Do you know where the International Court of Justice is? It is in The Hague in the Netherlands. I have been there. Do you know what else you will find in The Hague? There is a surviving document , a letter from Peter Schaghen, the original of which is held by the Rijksarchief in The Hague, showing how the Dutch bought Manhattan from the Lenape (Delaware) Indians for 60 Guilders back in 1624, drove them off their lands, and killed them off either by gun or smallpox. In 1630 they also bought Staten Island for another 60 Guilders. There is your exploitation.

How the Dutch bought Manhattan and Staten Island

Yes…these same hypocritical Dutch who criticized us South Africans for “exploiting blacks”, who formed the Dutch Anti Apartheid Movement and assisted the ANC, who is today destroying South Africa; destroying the various cultures and languages of South Africa…bought Manhattan for 60 Guilders. Today they are also waking up and seeing that South Africa and Apartheid wasn't so bad after all.

Besides what is exploitation? This concept of “exploitation” which is bandied about frequently by Liberal idiots is derived from dubious Marxian economics.

Apartheid South Africa had real economic policies such as the “Small Business Development Corporation” which helped blacks to become successful business people. And many did. Many became millionaires. The entire black taxi industry was created as such. Was that “exploitation”?

The South African policy of “Separate and equal development” (Apartheid) was not there to legalize exploitation, but to prevent and suppress it. The objective was to foster the economic development of ALL groups living in the Republic, not the development of one group at the expense of the other.

One of the major objectives of Apartheid was not to racially discriminate against anybody, but to eradicate racial discrimination. In a homogenous society where people vote for their own and rule themselves there cannot be any “racism”; There cannot be any “exploitation” of one race by another. This was exactly the reason for the homelands.

Sure Apartheid was not perfect. No political system is. Liberals were often fascinated by minor incidents of petty Apartheid and laid traps to make it look ridiculous, but forgot that any policy has its costs and penalties and yes, there were defects. The South African “Blueprint” for Apartheid was not complete and many procedures and solutions were tested experimentally. Some situations were unique and others very unpredictable; Some officious bureaucrats and “Stasieblompotte” interpreted regulations by the letter instead of by common sense, but that will always be so. We are only human.

Be it as it may, there is every reason to criticize mistakes, because criticism is the first step on the road to improvement, but the criticism is not valid unless it is derived from full comprehension of the overall facts and holistic observation of the entire system. The part cannot be criticized effectively if the whole is not seen, let alone understood.

You see, Mr. Ntshongola...What you blacks did was to reject Apartheid without understanding it. Now you have the ANC and you call them worse than Apartheid as if Apartheid was something bad, yet you long back to the days of Apartheid when you had excellent infrastructure. How should we whites understand this?

You Mr. Ntshongola, claims the villagers are mostly ANC supporters and should be prioritised by the government. Do you still have hopes that they will? You demonstrated at their offices, but they ignored you. They have ignored your knocking at their door for 22 years. When are you going to kick the damn door down?

You now have to buy gravel to fix the roads yourself, just so that the police, ambulances and fire brigades can reach you in times of need, because the useless ANC has done nothing for you in the past 22 years, yet you support them and vote for them election after election? Why? The mind boggles, Mr. Ntshongola. Is it simply because they have a black skin, because surely it cannot be on merit?

So you tell me Mr. Ntshongola, who are the real mindless “racists” here? And then you wonder why we call you backward, ignorant and stupid Kaffirs?

I will tell you why you are “backwards” Mr. Ntshongola.

It is because you are far behind the times. Look north to your Sub Saharan brothers who are daily fleeing their black run governments in their tens of thousands risking life and limb and scrambling off to white run European countries. By the time you lot in SA wake up, Europe will be full of your central African brethren and there won’t be space for you SA Bantus anymore. You are too far south; too far back. It is like a pyramid scheme; you need to get in first. You need to move it, move it. Gajima, gajima!

BTW…Say “hi” to the Dutch from me.

Just be warned that in Switzerland, Germany and Austria they have already started introducing segregation laws and rules. That’s right. They have Apartheid at swimming pools and trains. Apartheid is coming to Europe fast.

Just a few days ago a 17yo Afghanistani migrant who lived with a white German foster family for a few months since he entered less than a year ago, stabbed and hacked people with a knife and axe on a train near Würzburg in Bavaria after shouting “Allahu Akbar!” (Allah is great). Now the Germans are forcing migrants to wear a pass on them at all times and when stopped by the police they should present it immediately. Failure to do so will result in imprisonment and deportation.

Sounds familiar doesn’t it?

When we did exactly the same in the 1950’s they also called us, “Stupid”, Ignorant” and “Backwards”…. “Dumb Dutchmen” and “White kaffirs”, they called us…And now? Should we call them the same?

Now they can see we were not “backwards”. In fact we were 50-60 years ahead of Europe. We were visionaries. What we have forgotten about Apartheid they must still learn, and are learning more and more every day. Tja,...Manchmal ist Schadenfreude wirklich die schönste Freude.

Just like the blacks in the Eastern Cape are only waking up now and seeing that Apartheid was far better, Europeans will also come to realize very soon that Apartheid will be their only solution, because the other, in the words of Prime Minister John Vorster, is just too ghastly to contemplate.





19 July 2016

The lies around the African love story of Sir Seretse Khama and Lady Ruth Williams

Sir Seretse Khama and Lady Ruth Williams


By Mike Smith

19th of July 2016

I stopped going to the cinema about 10-15 years ago. One day I woke up and found that I just couldn’t stomach all this blatant, in your face, politically correct bullshit anymore. At the time the best movies on the circuit were animated ones and that says a lot about the quality of the crap that flowed from Hollywood.

Nevertheless, a while ago a read an article about a new film supposed to be released later this year about the love story of Botswana’s first president Sir Seretsi Khama and his white English wife Ruth Williams.

New film tells explosive tale about late Botswanan President

The film will be called “A United Kingdom” and Seretse Khama will be played by British Actor, David Oyelowo and Ruth Williams will be played by Rosamunde Pike. The director is Amma Asante, the black British screenwriter and director.

I have not seen the movie yet, but judging from the write-up that it got it is going to be a major hit and they are already polishing several Oscars for it.

Problem is that every good story needs a villain and when there is none, well you just invent one.

And so it is in the case of the movie about Sir Seretse Khama and his wife Lady Ruth Williams.

The movie makers had to first find a villain and secondly find a way to take a slap at whites like they always do. They didn’t have to look very far or for very long, because of course right next door to Botswana was the evil empire of the White Apartheid regime…So evil was it that at the time of Botswana’s independence in 1966 more Tswanas were living and working in South Africa (800,000) than living and working in Botswana itself (500,000).

Nevertheless, the movie makes it out as if the white South African regime was about to launch Apartheid at the time, when in fact it was already instituted by the British who also created the three black homelands of Betschuanaland, Lesotho and Swaziland.

…And of course these evil white Afrikaners did not want a black guy married to a white women living just across the border from them. Bad PR for their crap ideology of Apartheid, see? So it caused a diplomatic crisis….whoooo!

Now get this. The NP of South Africa came to power in June 1948 winning the elections with a slight majority after a coalition with the Afrikaner Party. Seretse Khama and Ruth Williams met a year earlier in 1947 and got married in September of 1948.

So they, the evil white Afrikaans bastards of little South Africa who just came to power, pressured the Mighty British Empire to break up the relationship between Seretse and his wife to be.

Sorry, but the word “Bullshit” seems to drift past my brain.

Nevertheless, the story tellers want us to believe that…Not Seretse’s uncle or his own protesting family and tribe of the Bamangwato people who ostracized him; not the British who banned him from his own country for five years (changed to “indefinitely” after the Tories returned to power) and forced him to give up his claim as prince of his tribe. Not the Bishop of London, Dr William Wand, who refused to marry them and instructed the whole Anglican Church to do the same; Not her father George who threw Ruth out of the house for wanting to marry a black dude; Not her boss at Lloyds of London who offered her a transfer to New York or be sacked (which she took)…

…No…White Afrikaans South Africa, and of course evil Apartheid were the pigs in the story and are to blame.

Even the liberal darling, Trevor Huddleston, later the archbishop of the Indian Ocean and a sainted opponent of apartheid, advised Sir Evelyn Baring, the High Commissioner to South Africa as well as Bechuanaland, against recognizing Seretse Khama as chief of the Bamangwato; though he later regretted it…

Funny enough, at the time of independence, one could see how well Britain looked after Botswana and how logically they administered it.

Botswana, that should have been part of the Union of South Africa in 1910 and the Homeland of the Tswana people, had its capital city, Mafikeng, outside of the country in the Cape Province of South Africa up until 1965.

At the time of independence, enrollment of school children in Botswana was only half that of Lesotho and only one fifth that of South Africa. Its pupil teacher ratio in secondary education was 11:1, primarily because of the small number of schoolchildren in this grade.

In 1961, UNESCO reported that there were only 30 teachers employed at secondary education so that the number of children in secondary schools at the time was a mere 330 in the entire country. By 1966 it rose to a wonderful 1,409.

Of course Botswana had no university of its own. The first one, the University of Botswana was established in 1982. So poor Sir Seretse Khama had to go and study at Fort Hare in the evil White South Africa (horror of horrors) and at Oxford in England, where he met his wife.

Of course, at the same time, the evil, bad, Apartheid, South Africa was producing thousands of highly skilled black teachers every year, from ten black universities (five in SA, five in the homelands), many of whom were Tswana speaking.

The money the 37,000 Tswana mine workers in SA sent home was the bread and butter of their country and before the Pula was introduced in 1976, Botswana used the South African Rand as its currency. A Rand was worth more than the US dollar, in fact one Rand was worth US$1.40 from the time of its inception in 1961 until 1982, when mounting political pressure combined with sanctions placed against the country due to apartheid started to erode its value.

Britain developed Botswana so well that at independence in 1966 it had no industries of any importance and about 98% of the people made a living through raising cattle. The amount of people earning regular salaries were less than 13,800 and almost all employed by the government. Botswana's only railway line was the was the South Africa-Rhodesia line which ran from Mafikeng in the Cape to Bulawayo in Rhodesia and was operated by Rhodesia Railways. This line carried all of Botswana's imports and exports. South Africa was the market for 40% of all Botswana’s exports.

At Botswana’s Independence Day celebrations, South Africa’s minister of foreign affairs, (one of those evil stupid ignorant, Apartheid “Dutchmen”) Dr Hilgard Müller, a Rhodes Scholar who earned a doctorate in law from Oxford, was an honorary guest of President Khama and the furniture in the office of Botswana’s president was a gift from the evil whites of Apartheid South Africa.

Incidentally in the other British protectorate of Lesotho, the Speaker of the House of Assembly also sits on an elaborately carved stinkwood chair – also a gift from the evil, bad, white scum regime of the former Apartheid South Africa.

Nevertheless, Sir Seretse Khama and his governing Democratic Party was so in love with the liberation movements that in early 1966 he published a document which not only attacked the opposition Botswana National Front as a “Communist front organization”, but rejected out of hand any O.A.U. proposal which smacked of “liberation movements” or which could bring Botswana into any kind of confrontation with White South Africa.

Whereas Britain, in the last five years of administration, gave anti-South African terrorist elements like the ANC and SWAPO free rein in Botswana, the new President, Sir Seretse Khama was cracking down on them, banning several members of the ANC leadership and eight members of the SWAPO leadership. The leader of SWAPO, Sam Nujoma, was declared a prohibited immigrant and had to move his base to Tanzania.

Of course there will always be those who say that the Apartheid government coerced their neighbours, threatened them and destabalised them, but this is very far from the truth.

In 1964, Sir Seretse Khama told reporters in New York,

“I think South Africa knows very well they stand for one thing – Apartheid – while we stand for the exact opposite, therefore we can never agree on ideology. But they have not tried to intervene in our affairs or to influence us in any way, and we have no reason to expect that they will try to do so in the future”.

So the mind boggles…if Apartheid South Africa tried so hard to break up the relationship between Seretse Khama and Ruth Williams, then why was he so friendly towards South Africa?

Of course we cannot allow facts, truth and uncomfortable questions to come in the way of a good story now, can we?

Nevertheless, after Seretse’s death, Ruth stayed on in Botswana and did charity work for the Red Cross. Her eldest son Ian Khama became the current president of Botswana in 2008, 28 years after his father’s death.

Ironically, there was a ripple of surprise in 1990 when her other son, “Tony”, one of the twins Tsekedi and Anthony, announced that he wanted to marry a South African white girl, an Afrikaner girl nogal, from the rural Afrikaner stronghold of Rustenberg across the border.

Funny how history has a tendency to repeat itself.

Lady Khama warned that there might be some trouble with conservative tribal elders. Funny enough, there were no objections from any of the white Afrikaners.

Of course Tsekedi, the other twin, is married to an Israeli, Thea…but that is a story for another day.

Main source: "The Third Africa", Dr Eschel Rhoodie.

16 July 2016

The succesful false flag staged failed coup in Turkey

By Mike Smith
17th of July 2016

I watched the so called “Putsch” in Turkey with a smile and amusement, because to anybody with a bit of brains it was clearly a false flag operation.

First of all it did not have the support of the entire army, only a few top officers who even held the army chief hostage. These soldiers who carried this out are either extremely badly trained, total morons or performing a poorly acted out and unconvincingly “show coup”.

Turkish soldiers normally get quite good training and they are definitely not idiots so that does not leave much else of what it could have been. After being arrested and being led away, they were even smiling for crying out loud.

Erdogan has been trying to change the constitution, set down by its first president Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, for quite a while now so that he could get the position of Executive President and consolidate more power into himself. He has been cracking down on dissidents and critics for a long time including trying to coerce the German government into imprisoning comedian Jan Böhmermann for calling him a goat shagger in a hilarious satirical poem.

It has been reported that since 2014 1,845 journalists, writers and critics have faced charges of insulting the president, an offence which in Turkey carries a potential jail sentence.

On top of it, since the Arab Spring he has been shitting himself, because protests against his increasingly dictatorial behaviour and one sided authoritarian decisions such as banning alcohol, media censorship and setting his goons on critics have increased exponentially, culminating in the Taksim Square/ Gezi Park protests in 2013.

In 2014 when the ISIS insurgents seized Kobani in Syria and displaced 300,000 Kurds who fled across the border to Turkey, the Turkish soldiers allowed them through, but prevented Kurdish volunteers and People Protection Units from going the other way to defend Kurds against ISIS. This sparked massive Kurdish protests in Turkey.

So when I saw this “coup” taking place in Turkey I just smiled as the word “Bullshit” drifted past my brain. I thought to myself…Erdogan must be loving this. This will give him the excuse to become full dictator and wipe out all opposition. It is a false flag as clear as Hitler burning the Reichstag and 911 giving the Americans the excuse to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. Always ask yourself who benefits the most.

Pleasant was my surprise when I noticed I am not the only crazy conspiracy theorist who thought so. Turkey coup: Conspiracy theorists claim attempt was faked by Erdogan

See, people underestimate Erdogan. The boy has big plans. In 1991, I was in Adana, Eastern Turkey (just to buy some leather jackets). I know the area quite well. Plenty Americans live there with their families and of course drive around in their American Pontiacs and Mustangs because nearby is the American Air Force base of Incirlik from where they have been flying sorties against ISIS in Syria. What people forget is that the Americans have 50 Nuclear weapons stationed there.

When the coup happened, the first thing Erdogan did was to shut the Airbase down and effectively held 50 US nuclear weapons hostage


Gülen and former Pope John Paul II
He also threatened America with war, because they are housing the moderate Turkish Muslim cleric Fethullah Gülen, whom Erdogan scapegoated as the mastermind behind the coup, and who is the man who is promoting a brand of the Islamic religion which promotes belief in science, interfaith dialogue and multi-party democracy which the Americans want to export throughout the entire Islamic world since their bombing campaigns in Iraq and Syria has failed miserably.

Gülen opened up a major can of worms in 2013 when he exposed widespread corruption by several bureaucrats, ministers, mayors, and family members of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) of Turkey resulting in widespread protests and calls for the resignation
of the government led by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

On 14 December 2014 Turkish police arrested more than two dozen senior journalists and media executives connected with the Gülen movement on various charges. On 20 January 2015, Turkish police launched raids in Ankara and three other cities, detaining some 20 people suspected of illegally eavesdropping on President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and other senior officials.

The suspects were linked to Turkey's telecommunications authority and to its scientific and technological research center TUBITAK. Local media said the move was aimed at the "parallel structure" — the term Erdogan uses to refer to Gülen's supporters in the judiciary, police and other institutions.

So Erdogan hates him...problem is, most Muslims reject Gülen too, because he promotes a pussyfied version of Islam that preaches tolerance and dialogue to Christians and Jews and the common good of Muslims the world over instead of what they want to hear i.e. Salafistic Jihad and the genocide of everyone that is not a Muslim.

Incidentally Fethullah Gulen also thinks this is a false flag operation

Nevertheless, as usual, one can always rely on the ANC clowns, who know absolutely fuckall about current world events, to provide us with our daily dose of laughter.

SA condemns coup attempt in Turkey

“The South African government has expressed concern over the attempted coup in Turkey‚ saying it strongly condemns any attempt to seize power through unconstitutional means. It also condemned the resolution of political disagreements through the use of force.”

Pretty rich coming from a Marxist terrorist organization that killed people with bombs, necklaces, tortures , throwing them off moving trains, making them eat and drink detergents, etc. to come to power in South Africa.

The former Department of Foreign Affairs now called DIRCO or Department of International Relations and Cooperation actually issued a statement.

“South Africa supports democracy and the rule of law and we are of the firm view that the will of the people must be respected. The South African Government appeals to the people and all political leaders in the country to refrain from any violent activities that may further undermine peace‚ security and stability in the country. We urge all involved to adhere to non-violence‚ and to debate issues in a peaceful and inclusive manner.”

It is not clear how the ANC intends to “support” Turkey…

Are they perhaps going to send in the useless SANDF like they did with Opperaiton Balls-up in September 1998 in Lesotho and got their arses kicked when they wanted to prop up their big mate and undemocratic dictator King Letsie III?

OK, strictly speaking it was acting President Mangsuthu Buthelezi who gave the order to invade and the OC was Colonel Robbie Hartslief, a white veteran of the Angolan invasions in 1987/88 known collectively as the “Batlle of Cuito Cuanavale”, but still…Tiny Lesotho led them into an ambush and kicked the shit out of them to the point where they had to call in 450 reinforcements and a further 120 from Botswana to come and bail them out.